Tea Party & Anti Masturbation?

reply to post by SeventhSeal


So you are afraid she will somehow stop you from masturbating?

Originally posted by OldDragger
Because she's in the Tea Party, you LOVE her!

I love that she beat Mike Castle and ticked off Republican HQ.
As to if she or Coons wins the slot in November ... I don't care.

reply to post by SeventhSeal


Great – just what the world needs is Victorian ethics making a comeback. Haven't we learned that morality is subjective? Anyone who uses a single book to define how they should and shouldn't behave might as well stamp "sucker" on their forehead. Dammit I'm sick of living on a planet full of retards. Where's the exit?

reply to post by adifferentbreed

Um, a woman...promoting wholesomeness

I did not know that the new definition of "wholesomeness" is "indoctrination."

reply to post by adifferentbreed

If you don't masturbate then she can control you better, because you are at her mercy you would go insane.
Then she can flip her eyes and do tricks, control you rase you testestoron levels trapped in you that are going sky high. Everything is about control. I would say I don;t control you, you don't control me.I pounder, become this little robot trapped in a human body. We are suppose to have limits, going against your will is like going against gravity, we do it. But masturbation, please. What am I for around, not to flip your eyes and say wow, that is for sure.

I bother no one, so it does not affect her way of life. I see how people go impose their will on others, then you say no, then they come again, then you say no again, then they insist, then you just run off.

I thought she would explain how to anti-masturbate in the video... maybe I missed something important.

One further thought, if the biggest skeleton in her closet is she spoke out against masterbation as a youth, I'd say she's far more qualified for office than most........bring me evidence of drug use, dui's, unpaid taxes, bribery, illegitamate kids, you know, something of the norm today.......if this is all ya got, I say elect her now.

reply to post by adifferentbreed


Isn't that the point? Who would you rather have in office? Someone who understands the possibilities and consequences of poor decisions or one who has blind faith in some magical ideal that goes against all recorded natural history?

reply to post by evil incarnate


If you are asking if I'd rather have her or the usual criminal in office, I'd have to say her. also, the criminals you are talking about don't realize the consequences of their actions, as there are none for the most part. I just don't get it, again, if this is the biggest skeleton in her closet, I'd say she's far better than other choices.

Originally posted by Jenna
Talk about going to an all time low to discredit someone. I thought I'd seen it all, but apparently I was wrong.

Yea, this is getting a little ridiculous, but they should keep it up, it is just making the Tea partiers more resolute,

OP keep it up with those low blows, it's working.

Originally posted by ljtg123
reply to post by SeventhSeal

 

So you are afraid she will somehow stop you from masturbating?

I wanted to add after the GOP said they wouldn't supporter her after her win last night, with in 24 hrs. she had 500,000 dollars worth of donations,

People are sick of the good ole boys.

Originally posted by adifferentbreed
One further thought, if the biggest skeleton in her closet is she spoke out against masterbation as a youth, I'd say she's far more qualified for office than most........bring me evidence of drug use, dui's, unpaid taxes, bribery, illegitamate kids, you know, something of the norm today.......if this is all ya got, I say elect her now.

So you'd rather a prude who will tell you how to live, versus a - who'd accept you as you are?

Yeah that makes sense.

reply to post by adifferentbreed


So fairy magic and pixie dust for you then? To each his own I suppose but I hope you have that same mindset when a squeaky clean Christian Scientist is appointed surgeon general. Good luck with keeping children from touching themselves. Maybe she can make lead into gold next.

reply to post by TheMalefactor


It does make sense.

Ones a criminal and the other is not, true?

This was her view almost 20 years ago.

Also who is to say she is still anti masturbation? Has she spoken out on it recently, or was that the one and only time?

This is such a petty thing to even bring up that if I was able to I would vote for her instead of the other guy soley because he was such a pathetic idiot to drag up such a non issue to begin with.

I don't mind smear campaigns, but this is a sign of a desperate attempt from a desperate man. The sad thing is that it seems that it will gather a few votes. I wish people would get their heads out their butts and stop voting for or against someone because of their religous beliefs.

reply to post by OldDragger


Something wrong with a view you don't have? Commie's, God forbid someone don't think about their body like you
CAN YOU SAY HYPROCRITS!!!!!!!! maybe if you got laid sometime you wouldn't be so uptight about others sexual beliefs!

reply to post by Becoming


You are right, this is a truly petty and trivial thing to be all hung up on; especially if it is all you have on someone. I am just hanging around to see how many birthers come in to call this petty.

So being against masterbation makes one a prude? Man, look at her age, your thoughts on things haven't changed over time? Can you guys be more insulting, I mean some of you on here support how great islam is, yet lose it when a Christian runs for office, hypocrasy? And I'm neither a Christian, nor a muslim, so that part really doesn't bother me. As a final thought, the pot head part doesn't bother me, and obviously it didn't affect Obama getting elected, however, it is a crime......maybe the reason we are in the position we are now is we keep electing criminals to office.

Originally posted by TheMalefactor

Originally posted by adifferentbreed
One further thought, if the biggest skeleton in her closet is she spoke out against masterbation as a youth, I'd say she's far more qualified for office than most........bring me evidence of drug use, dui's, unpaid taxes, bribery, illegitamate kids, you know, something of the norm today.......if this is all ya got, I say elect her now.

So you'd rather a prude who will tell you how to live, versus a pot-head who'd accept you as you are?

Yeah that makes sense.

George would have said you do what you want I'll do what the F#%&@ I want ! Where the hell is the making you live like she wants you to live? A view is an opinion not do what I tell you? maybe to hard to see reality or contemplate reason! Think later after the buzz is gone

reply to post by slinger


Commies? WTF?
She's perfectly entitled to her views.
And I have every right to judge those views when she wants to be part of the lawmaking establishment.
In my view, fundamentalist see everything as good vs evil, or God vs. Satan.
This is nonsense in my opinion, and does not make for good governing. When a person enters the public arena, all of us have a right to judge what they say and do,
get in now?

Originally posted by Becoming
reply to post by TheMalefactor

 

I wish people would get their heads out their butts and stop voting for or against someone because of their religous beliefs.

The last time we had a religious idealist in office that worked out beautifully in Iraq. [/sarcasm]