Tea Party & Anti Masturbation?, page 12

posted on Sep, 17 2010 @ 11:21 PM

link

The only way she will lose in november is for her opponent to run on a pro masturabtion platform. Thats the ticket!

posted on Sep, 18 2010 @ 08:58 AM

link

Why is this such a massive deal? A person's political beliefs change over the course of their life time. How many of you didnt vote Republican after Bush?

It's a simple enough concept. That was 20 years ago, I'm sure you guys can relate to that.

Flatfish

posted on Sep, 18 2010 @ 09:16 AM

link

reply to post by SeventhSeal

Let's see here, it's OK to "race bait," it's OK to "hate bait," it's just not OK to "masturbate."

Yeah it's hilarious. For someone who is so outspoken against masturbation, she sure seems to enjoy jacking off the american voter into believing that she actually stands for morality. This woman, like the rest of the tea party, is the biggest joke since "Knock- Knock, Who's There?"

Azekual

posted on Sep, 18 2010 @ 10:22 AM

link

Originally posted by Flatfish
reply to post by SeventhSeal

Let's see here, it's OK to "race bait," it's OK to "hate bait," it's just not OK to "masturbate."

Yeah it's hilarious. For someone who is so outspoken against masturbation, she sure seems to enjoy jacking off the american voter into believing that she actually stands for morality. This woman, like the rest of the tea party, is the biggest joke since "Knock- Knock, Who's There?"

Excuse me, I haven't been paying much attention to detailed politics
how does tea party suck

Flatfish

posted on Sep, 18 2010 @ 10:29 AM

link

reply to post by Azekual

I don't think I said that they suck. What I said is that they are a joke.

I think Bill Maher said it right when he said that for the republicans, the tea party is like the girlfriend they have been having sex with in private but refuse to date in public.

Lovemaster9000

posted on Sep, 18 2010 @ 11:45 AM

link

reply to post by SeventhSeal

What's the world coming to when a guy can't have a healthy prostate.

Logarock

posted on Sep, 18 2010 @ 03:52 PM

link

Originally posted by Flatfish
reply to post by Azekual

I don't think I said that they suck. What I said is that they are a joke.

I think Bill Maher said it right when he said that for the republicans, the tea party is like the girlfriend they have been having sex with in private but refuse to date in public.

Yes and the libs no that she is such a slut that she will lead many of their own astray.

staver

posted on Sep, 18 2010 @ 05:00 PM

link

Originally posted by FlyersFan

Originally posted by Jenna
Talk about going to an all time low to discredit someone. I thought I'd seen it all, but apparently I was wrong.

You should have been here for the past few weeks. O'Donnell said the Republican party had turned canibalistic and she's right. Castle played dirty. O'Donnell kept it clean. Castle was the darling of the party. O'Donnell was the choice of the people. He was NASTY .... downright awful ... and he's acting childish now that she won.

O'Donnell did not keep it clean. She insinuated he was a closet homosexual and told him to "put his man pants on". She's a loon, and I'm an evangelical christian. She thinks you can "cure" gays and her opinions pretty much haven't changed over the years. I don't like her because she's a hypocrite, a liar, all of which can be proven and is being proven by her past staff and aquaintances. What most of you can't seem to get is that
these people yell and scream about big government, but they want to legislate morality. I'm pro-life, but they, including her, want to make it illegal to get an abortion even in cases of rape and incest. In other words, they want government out of healthcare but up their their collective ears in womens reproductive rights. Really, really, really hypocritical.

Oh, and she also claims that science is bad because, and I quote, "scientists have created mice with fully functioning human brains".

edit on 18-9-2010 by staver because: forgot about this before.

DGFenrir

posted on Sep, 18 2010 @ 05:09 PM

link

staver

posted on Sep, 18 2010 @ 05:32 PM

link

Originally posted by DaMod
reply to post by OldDragger

I agree actually. However using the "speaking in tongues" line really only applies to a very very very small group of people. Just FYI.

It is an insult to you intelligence to say something like that.

Yes, but Sarah Palin is Assembly of God, and they DO speak in tongues, I was one of them for 16 years.
(Not that I'm not a christian now, just non-denominational) What I'm wondering is if asked about it if Palin would
admit it, or would she deny the Holy Spririt, as it were.

staver

posted on Sep, 18 2010 @ 05:39 PM

link

I will give you that, sort of. As soon as I heard the name of yet another Republican rich person with years in politics being favored by the Tea Party, I thought to myself 'I wonder if she is also going to turn out to be a theocrat with a history of saying crazy things.'
You are right, I did make a judgment call before I knew anything about her. I did not decide what she was but I was more than prepared to hear another "Christian" say something wacky. Maybe it is wrong to assume these kinds of things. I could be way off, eventually.

What is that Carl Paladino? You are pro-life and want to put the poor in prison camps?

Let's hope next time I will be wrong.

edit on 9/16/10 by evil incarnate because: (no reason given)

She's not rich, just wants to be. She hasn't had a job in years, got her home forclosed, her bf bought it. She also lied about her college education and hasn't paid taxes for a handfull of years. She lives off of her campaign contribuitions. But she a Christian, so that's okay.

staver

posted on Sep, 18 2010 @ 05:41 PM
link

Originally posted by _SilentAssassin_
Typical MSNBC vicious trash.

edit on 16-9-2010 by _SilentAssassin_ because: (no reason given)

No, that would be Faux News you're thinking of, I've yet to catch MSNBC in a lie. Faux News on the other hand doesn't even try to hide it.

jonathanjohns96

posted on Sep, 19 2010 @ 11:20 AM
link

About two months ago I was talking to my friend about how puritanical Americans are about sex. (Both of us are Americans.) I mentioned to him about how some Americans are always trying to get teenagers to avoid sex. I told him "It's hopeless! Because they got hormones!" He told me an interesting story.

He said that he knew a woman who was in a girl's reform school when she was in her mid teens. She told him that when they were served hot dogs in the cafeteria they were always cut up into pieces no longer than one inch in length. Naive as I am, I asked "Why?" He replied "Because the girls were taking them back to their rooms." It probably took me another 20 seconds to figure out what he was really talking about.

So the anti-masturbation crowd is already active in the United States. And it does prove how wacky these puritanical Christians really are. They would gladly enforce all of their rules on everyone, not just prisoners, if they could get away with it.

JohnInFL

posted on Sep, 19 2010 @ 02:13 PM
link

reply to post by SeventhSeal

In what capacity do YOU believe she will attempt or is contemplating legislation based on her moral belief regarding masturbation?

JohnInFL

posted on Sep, 19 2010 @ 02:18 PM
link

reply to post by Flatfish

Knock Knock.
who's there?

Come on, state your case, are you really 13?

jonathanjohns96

posted on Sep, 19 2010 @ 04:21 PM
link

Regarding Christine O'Donnel, the subject of masturbation is just a warning sign. It's just the tip of the iceberg. If she has such wacky ideas about masturbation as a result of being a fundamentalist/puritanical Christian, she no doubt has many other ideas of the same caliber. As a result, as a fundamentalist/puritanical Christian she brings a certain agenda to any political office she will occupy. And if she believed it 20 years ago, she probably still believes it. She simply learned to not talk about it publicly due to possible negative repercussions at the voting booth.

George Bush Jr got into office as a quasi fundamentalist/puritanical Christian. Before he got into office, people said "Don't worry. He isn't going to change anything." Then once in office he steadfastly set about scaling back the abortion rights for women. He also made it legal for the federal government to donate money to Christian organizations, something that was preciously banned as a result of the separation of religion and government.

So these fundamentalist/puritanical Christian wackos do change the laws in favor of their religion when they get into office. It's a known fact. That is why any American who is interested in preserving their civil rights needs to be concerned about someone like Christine O'Donnell.

Bunken Drum

posted on Sep, 25 2010 @ 10:04 AM
link

Originally posted by JohnInFL
reply to post by Flatfish

Knock Knock.
who's there?
Juan.
Juan who?
Juan Kerr!

fooks

posted on Sep, 25 2010 @ 10:14 AM
link

Originally posted by Logarock
The only way she will lose in november is for her opponent to run on a pro masturabtion platform. Thats the ticket!

yes she would loose!
may be the obamacare has a thing for that?

it would create jobs for sure!
plenty people will line up for the obamacare whack job.

Sunlionspirit

posted on Oct, 21 2010 @ 01:25 PM
link

reply to post by Freenrgy2

not true !!! it's just the way they want to convert everybody to their stupid religious beliefs telling us G-d is a punishing one, a Stalin or a Hitler one ....
God is love, the teapot potties are stupid manipulators !!!
The State is not the religion !!
Always they say and they want to diminish the State influence on a daily basis, the power of the State must diminish !!! but on the other hand they want to improve the way that State is controlling your masturbation/religious behaviour !!!!
crazy SHIZOS !!!!

Flatfish

posted on Oct, 22 2010 @ 09:23 AM
link

Stephen Colbert had something to say about this issue that was quite enlightening, check it out here; www.colbertnation.com...

I don't think anyone could have expressed it better.