Ancient Mars

reply to post by ArMaP


If you didn't understand that, how in the world can you understand what you see on Mars pics?

reply to post by BIONICLE ALEX


Understanding what's in a photo is much easier than understanding what was on the mind of someone I don't know when that person wrote something I don't understand.

reply to post by ArMaP


That's my point, and again I rest my case.

I know what I know cause I know. Sometimes people doesn't know what they have on their hands in till they loose it. We don't have enough time on this planet and most of you are not looking where you suppose to be looking at.

Can you figure that out?

I love all the real science here on ATS on one hand all the science is somehow hidden from all, on the other hand all is known.When you put the two together you have ATS LOL.
Children if you want to learn about Mars go there.

Inform your selves and see the walls become sand beneath your feet.

reply to post by BIONICLE ALEX

So, dear Alex, what you've posted is supposed to be incontrovertible evidence of advanced lifeforms on Mars?? Sheeesh! If that's all the evidence you can produce, then you're way out of your depth!

Originally posted by OrionHunterX
reply to post by BIONICLE ALEX

 

So, dear Alex, what you've posted is supposed to be incontrovertible evidence of advanced lifeforms on Mars?? Sheeesh! If that's all the evidence you can produce, then you're way out of your depth!

Oh dear lord!! their is a reason why they call them sheep's.

Originally posted by BIONICLE ALEX

Originally posted by OrionHunterX
reply to post by BIONICLE ALEX

 

So, dear Alex, what you've posted is supposed to be incontrovertible evidence of advanced lifeforms on Mars?? Sheeesh! If that's all the evidence you can produce, then you're way out of your depth!

Oh dear lord!! their is a reason why they call them sheep's.

edit on 12-9-2010 by BIONICLE ALEX because: (no reason given)

Either this is incredible failure of logic or simple trolling take you're pick. So are you saying we are sheep because you do not want to answer the questions or cant. Or

reply to post by Unknown Soldier


Do you think I'm going to answer that to you?

Unknown Soldier
Man In Black CIA Disinfo

How many of you are out there right now?

Originally posted by BIONICLE ALEX
reply to post by Unknown Soldier

 

Do you think I'm going to answer that to you?

Unknown Soldier
Man In Black CIA Disinfo

How many of you are out there right now?

If i was a CIA NSA MIB whatever you call it, why would i put it under my name? I mean really why would i feed the lunatic fringe in all the paranoia? Yes a message board is stopping disclosure..

Really?


No it is for the sake of sarcasm and to test if one really knows what exactly a CIA agent is or what have you. Do you really think disinfo people would use a web site to sway opinion? A man with a real head on his shoulders would know an apple from an orange at the end f the day. You are missing the point. And who is to say you are or are not disnfo yourself?

reply to post by Unknown Soldier



ArMap wrote this:

Understanding what's in a photo is much easier than understanding what was on the mind of someone I don't know when that person wrote something I don't understand.

............................................................
And if you are what your AVATAR say it is, then I now understand were you coming from.

Originally posted by BIONICLE ALEX
reply to post by Unknown Soldier

 

ArMap wrote this:

Understanding what's in a photo is much easier than understanding what was on the mind of someone I don't know when that person wrote something I don't understand.

Right! Understanding what's in those photos is way easier than trying to figure out what's on your mind (whom I don't know from Adam), when you wrote something I didn't quite understand!

And by the way, what's with your signature, "WE CHANGE OURSELVES"?

Are you a Martian shape-shifter? Lol!

Originally posted by BIONICLE ALEX
Sometimes people doesn't know what they have on their hands in till they loose it. We don't have enough time on this planet and most of you are not looking where you suppose to be looking at.

Can you figure that out?

I agree that we sometimes do not know what we have, but I still don't understand what you mean with your last posts.

I was never good at word games, specially in a language that is not my own. It's too easy to create misunderstandings when people are not clear about what they want to say, and although I understand that sometimes people do not want to (or cannot) say all they should, I hate misunderstanding, they are the source of many problems and, at best, a way of losing time.

Originally posted by BIONICLE ALEX
reply to post by ArMaP

 

If you didn't understand that, how in the world can you understand what you see on Mars pics?

Well, not wanted to be a bit rude here BIONICLE ALEX, but I also did take a look at those pictures and added remarks you did post there and I also do not really understand what you mean there.

Originally posted by BIONICLE ALEX
reply to post by dimburg

 

Do you think the Star Child is real?

I think the Starchild's skull is human until proven otherwise

As you can see from the second link, these are still preliminary DNA results. I'd rather wait for the completed tests and see if other independent geneticists agree on the methods and final findings, before making conclusions on the subject.

Originally posted by Unknown Soldier
If i was a CIA NSA MIB whatever you call it, why would i put it under my name? I mean really why would i feed the lunatic fringe in all the paranoia?

Hiding in plain sight...



There are several here, I have a list But most of em are on our side

Going back to the opening post, I was looking at the Sols before and after Sol 1070, the one when this photo was taken.



In this photo the rover was "looking" back from where it came, so those objects (or whatever they are) should be visible in the previous Sols, while the rover was moving to its place in Sol 1070, but I cannot find anything that looks like those.

The closest I could find was this, but I know it's not good enough to explain those objects, not even to me.

reply to post by ArMaP


so you are saying that you cannot find these objects on other images?

That is VERY interesting. The not quite so tongue in cheek claims of them being a "caravan" might be seen in a whole new light.

Something is not right about that photo.

Beware of false prophets.

reply to post by BIONICLE ALEX




Having been at this for quite a few years, I have seen and discussed that very photo. Actually, I believe ArMaP and I have discussed it in the past, as well (I cannot imagine we haven't).

ArMaP is as solid as it gets. Would you care to elucidate on your "false prophets" posting?