2 UFO photos daytime

Originally posted by m0r1arty
Although I can't read him due to the lovely ignore button under his avatar TeslandTyne showing up means that you are heading into a world of absolute nonsense by way of thread conclusion if science is your basis of belief/knowing the best we can.

Just a tip!

-m0r

Possible Tesla ships.
There are more ships in the sky 27/7 than there lens flares.
The bright luminescence about the tilted T might be two ships.
Also behind the circle in the cloud above the lens flare around the light pole.
Ship vibrations should cause cloud circles.
There is no rotation for a spiral.

Listing of photos and major details:

ring in distant cloud
img839.imageshack.us/i/hpim0923.jpg/
img843.imageshack.us/i/hpim0923.jpg/
img830.imageshack.us/i/hpim0923.jpg/
img830.imageshack.us/i/hpim0923q.jpg/
img839.imageshack.us/i/hpim0923i.jpg/
img844.imageshack.us/i/hpim0923.jpg/
img295.imageshack.us/i/hpim0923.jpg/
img843.imageshack.us/i/hpim0923o.jpg/
img840.imageshack.us/i/hpim0924.jpg/
img833.imageshack.us/i/hpim0924o.jpg/
img844.imageshack.us/i/hpim0925.jpg/
img830.imageshack.us/i/hpim0925.jpg/
img69.imageshack.us/i/hpim0925p.jpg/
img844.imageshack.us/i/hpim0925w.jpg/
img830.imageshack.us/i/hpim0925w.jpg/
img818.imageshack.us/i/hpim0925.jpg/

two purple ovals and rays
img841.imageshack.us/i/hpim0927.jpg/
img835.imageshack.us/i/hpim0927.jpg/
img835.imageshack.us/i/hpim0927h.jpg/
img842.imageshack.us/i/hpim0927.jpg/


still ring in distant cloud
img835.imageshack.us/i/hpim0928.jpg/
img836.imageshack.us/i/hpim0928.jpg/
img835.imageshack.us/i/hpim0928e.jpg/
img375.imageshack.us/i/hpim0928.jpg/
img844.imageshack.us/i/hpim0928.jpg/


last of 49? (26 listed?)
img831.imageshack.us/i/hpim0929v.jpg/

Do we have a UFO ship inside a cloud.
Interesting.
ED: Lens flare no. Ship vibration yes.


[edit on 8/29/2010 by TeslaandLyne]

reply to post by rusethorcain


Thanks Yes it must be quite big.

I dont think it has anything to do with the norway spiral I have another intresting photo I took the other DAY next to the sun with a glider flying next to the object a white dumbell object durring the day interesting.

The other picture is some flying object, most probably not an alien.
The other picture is a very common particle of moist on the lens.

Bravo, PolluxCatapult. Some times you need to get straight to the point...

Originally posted by PolluxCatapult
In the OP you state that when you took the picture there was nothing in the sky (at least nothing you were aware of)

Indeed he did:

ufosbri - I was takeing photos randomly of the sky and the objects in the photos appeared I did not see them at the time.

.. but in later posts you state the direction of travel, you mention this contrail behind it, and you generally talk about it as if you were looking at when you took the picture.

Indeed he did:

ufosbri - The object is moveing east.... the other object is moveing west.

So...did you know it was there or not? If not, how do you know what direction it was traveling?

Exceptionally good questions. These are STILL images. They show no movement blur. He said he didn't see the objects. SO HOW ON EARTH could he know what direction they were allegedly traveling, or even if they were moving at all?? I'll tell you...

The guy just makes this stuff up as he goes along, and hopes nobody notices.

I'm not the first one to bring this up, but it doesn't really seem to be an issue with many people and it's bugging the mess out of me.

Sometimes I think ATS allows a little too much latitude - I mean, we all make mistakes, and accidentally muck stuff up. But in cases where someone obviously sets out to mislead...

...there have been many pictures linked that show the same effects in your photos, just because you reply with "Nope, not the same thing" doesn't debunk anything, it just shows that your unwilling to accept (or even consider, for that matter) any hypotheses that don't coincide with your own.

Yep, as any person familiar with lenses will know, to duplicate an optical anomaly like a lens flare precisely, you need an identical camera with an identical lens (which is simply not possible - every lens differs), and it must use identical settings, in identical conditions. To any normal person that means all you really need to do is show something similar, and use your brain. But to ufosbri, it is a way for him to try to squirm away from the simple fact that his image shows a lens flare.

If it *wasn't* an optical effect, then you have to ask - exactly what sort of observer misses something like that???

Finally, and maybe I'm breaking a respect or kindness rule or something, but your a jerk. Maybe not in life, cause I don't personally know you, but in this thread your the biggest D-Bag I've ever read posts from.

Quoted for posterity...!

Saying "did someone give you a star for effort? haha" and telling people to shut up...I don't know, I don't understand how anybody could want to be on your side of the debate, based on your prickish attitude.

Well, *I* didn't want to make a big thing out of that, because he was referring to me and I don't like to whine... But yes, it's pretty childish - again, it is interesting how those sort of comments come thick and fast when the person concerned seems to be unable to debate the actual facts, or understand basic photographic concepts.

Sorry for the long winded post, but those are my thoughts on this...

I found it quite entertaining, but I'm biased, of course...

ufosbri, have you gone and taken several shots into the sun with that camera, to show us some IDENTICAL examples for us to peruse. They have to be identical, remember. And original uncropped images please.

Let the facts do the talking, I say.

reply to post by ufosbri


Ufosbri.....

Come on mate.....

There was nothing in ths sky.

You are.....

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/6bdd4dfcd2bd.gif[/atsimg]

Regards
Maybe...maybe not

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by ufosbri

 

Ufosbri.....

Come on mate.....

There was nothing in ths sky.

You are.....

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/6bdd4dfcd2bd.gif[/atsimg]

Regards
Maybe...maybe not

....wait a flamin' minute....

...(gets out Image Truth Detector®, made from cardboard and string)...

THAT'S CGI!!! MMN, you traitor!!

I've even found the original image of that horse (with full EXIF, I'll have you know), and he was ASLEEP, not dead!!!!

I'm dobbin.


(Geddit??)

My dear friend,

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
Ufosbri.....

Come on mate.....

There was nothing in ths sky.

You are.....

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/6bdd4dfcd2bd.gif[/atsimg]

Regards
Maybe...maybe not

Lmao, to funny....



Be safe be well,

Spiro

reply to post by CHRLZ


CHRLZ.....

I'm dobbin.

(Geddit??)

Yup.....I goddit!

You always were one of the fizziest drinks in the fridge!

Cheers mate
Maybe...maybe not

reply to post by CHRLZ


I have posted 49 photos on page 2 or three I gess you missed that of the same place.

Why do the same people keep commenting when they have no Answers.

Move on


the objects moving west because the contrail is at the back which is east getit dude

[edit on 24/09/2008 by ufosbri]

reply to post by CHRLZ


So i take it you dont want to look at the other photos mate I give more evidence and you dont want to know, mmm thought so.

nothing to say.

[edit on 24/09/2008 by ufosbri]

Originally posted by ufosbri
I have posted 49 photos on page 2 or three I gess you missed that of the same place.

You posted them on page 5, actually...

And please try to keep up. Here's what I said (you know, the bit you didn't want to quote):

.. have you gone and taken several shots into the sun with that camera, to show us some IDENTICAL examples for us to peruse. They have to be identical, remember. And original uncropped images please.

In other words, the images would need to have the sun in exactly the same location in the frame. And oh yes, I'd be happy to browse through 49 incredibly boring images to try to find one that might be like that..

Why do the same people keep commenting when they have no Answers.

Why do some people keep posting camera artefacts, dust motes and lens flares, claiming they are UFO's, and wasting the forum's time? I invite readers to examine ufosbri's posting history. Any questions?

Move on

He got this bit right. Nothing to see here. There are several genuinely unexplained issues currently being discussed elsewhere - this one is a distraction and complete waste of time.

the objects moving west because the contrail is at the back which is east getit dude

Classic. Problem is, you said you didn't see anything, remember? Therefore, how on earth can you say that was a 'trail'? How do you know it isn't part of the 'thing' itself? How do you know it was behind, not in front? I mean, really...

Here's some tips for your next thread:
-drop the attitude
-don't change the story
-learn to recognise optical effects on your camera
-if you are in doubt about what you are seeing, ASK, don't assume
-think logically and consider all possibilities.. properly.

If you don't do those things, you might get a reputation. Wouldn't want that, now would we.......

reply to post by CHRLZ


CHRLZ.....

Did you see his new thread?

Here's some tips for your next thread:
-drop the attitude

That didn't happen!

Cheers mate
Maybe...maybe not

i]reply to post by CHRLZ


I think your just a disinfo agent nothing to say only here to disrupt threads mislead or follow the rest of the sceptics.
Your going in my disinfo agents list.

You have shown no evidence for sun flare.
I have posted 49 other photos but you say I dont have time to look at your photos or there not exact.
You keep looking for people to back you up.
does it really p you off when I say its a UFO haha

Originally posted by ufosbri
i]reply to post by CHRLZ

 

I think your just a disinfo agent nothing to say only here to disrupt threads mislead or follow the rest of the sceptics.
Your going in my disinfo agents list.
You have shown no evidence for sun flare.
I have posted 49 other photos but you say I dont have time to look at your photos or there not exact.
You keep looking for people to back you up.
does it really p you off when I say its a UFO haha

Ufosbri.....

May I be so presumptuous as to ask 2 questions of you?

If you feel I may, here are my questions:

1. Don't you feel that we are extraordinarily furtunate to have a member with the experience, knowledge & wisdom of CHRLZ, who can help us Deny Ignorance in this manner?

2. Which other members are on your "disinfo agent" list?

Thank you for considering my questions.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

Originally posted by ufosbri
Your going in my disinfo agents list.

Oh no.. please NOOO!!! Tell me it isn't true!!!

I'm devastated. (sob)





Judging by the stars, i don't need to look for people to back me up, but who's counting..

My dear friend,

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not

If you feel I may, here are my questions:

1. Don't you feel that we are extraordinarily furtunate to have a member with the experience, knowledge & wisdom of CHRLZ, who can help us Deny Ignorance in this manner?

2. Which other members are on your "disinfo agent" list?

3. Would you mind explaining/proving, just like a few members have asked now, on why/how you believe this is a UFO?

Thank you for considering my questions.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

Be safe be well,

Spiro

Emphasis added!

21 photos of a cloud with a magnifying lens in it.
?
Yeah are they looking at Brian with some sort of high voltage wave
viewing device.
I heard of these wonders from a Mr. Lyne but never did I or perhaps
the crew and uber agents would suspect we could detect their
presence in a cloud.
That cloud has to be ignored with a capital I.
No one will pay attention to those pic, they are safe because there
is no de bunk yet.
Agents are working on it for sure.

As for the original sideways T that is all lit up.
Thats two ships in the distance.
A perfect way to line up as top bottom and sideways forces are
the only directions stated by Tesla for his ship.

As the original two ships forming the tilted T might still be behind the cloud
they might be generation that circle in the cloud.

Originally posted by ufosbri

4 Other ATS members think mabe Sun Glare but with NO Evidence to back there claim no pictures or video that looks anything like it.

What evidence could any one here possibly provide other than photos of similar artefacts (which they have) unless they also happened to be outside your house at the time in question and also took photos of the same sky?

Originally posted by ufosbri
5 What does it look like Its a circle inside a circle Donut shape bright luminus color with a hint of blue around the edge.

The sun shining through the clouds lower down in the picture has the same hint of blue which suggests the colour isn't intrinsic to the 'object' but a result of a combination of the lighting conditions and your camera.

You are from 4Chan and I claim my five pounds