It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
reply to post by Xcathdra
I was stating that protocols are not abided...one of the earmarks of social experimentation is to not have consent in the most extreme cases.
Not everyone obeys...especially Black Ops.
Message sent.
Originally posted by trutherman
Originally posted by SarK0Y
reply to post by trutherman
did you scan your brain in hospital?? if you got some devices into your skull, it must be gleamed on scan.
They did an image scan of my brain, all I saw was a text report saying my brain was normal. The scan left me dizzy though. Im thinking they tranduce soundwaves through electrical lines into anything that causes sound occilations. Or it is a satallite or I genuinely have schizophrenia. But the accounts of gangstalking and street theater are true, I genuinely witnessed that.
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by RestingInPieces
Can you give everyone details on why the source is accurate and trustworthy?
The source lied about the court case, microchips are not mentioned anywhere in the court case.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
I dont think civilian Hospitals are going to up and go Frankenstein on people..
Originally posted by Xcathdra
If we go with the Conspiracy side I guess we could look at DARPA programs, or montauk New York site, which was dealing with mind control techniques (supposedly with Alien assistance).
This has been linked into the Dulce New Mexico secret base as well, and also the Philadelphia experiment.
There is also the issue with some people who live near the Great Lakes who constantly hear a low humming sound. Speculation here is its a communication device for our Navy Subs (ELF - Extremely Low Frequencies).
Certainly enough ciscumstantial evidence to look into the stuff so we dont send the wrong people to psyche wards.
Originally posted by SarK0Y
[oh, come on, Alien assistance what do these morons make else with Alien assistance??? ELF? say, please, certain range of frequencies.
Originally posted by wcitizen
Wow, there's no law preventing the implantation of chips in people without their consent. Now, I know they wouldn't respect the law, but it just shows me how bad things have become that there doesn't even exist a law to protect people's rights in the most vital respect.
Originally posted by spaznational
Originally posted by wcitizen
Wow, there's no law preventing the implantation of chips in people without their consent. Now, I know they wouldn't respect the law, but it just shows me how bad things have become that there doesn't even exist a law to protect people's rights in the most vital respect.
Wow, let me use this teachable moment for a little denial of ignorance. I assume you've taken multiple law courses like me, including health care law, right? Oh, lol, well certainly you're aware that medical procedures--including prosthetic devices and implants--without express or implied consent are considered BATTERY by the law.
"Late last year, James Walbert went to court, to stop his former business associate from blasting him with mind-altering electromagnetic radiation. "
"On December 30th, the court decided in Walbert’s favor, and issued a first-of-its-kind order of protection, banning Redford from using “electronic means” to further harass Walbert. No, seriously."
Hi and welcome to our group. The name of our organization is Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance. We are covert victims of such crimes as: organized stalking and harassment, Voice to Skull transmissions, mind reading and thought surveillance technology, (and we can produce the documents to show that this technology exists and is in use today - and has been for some time), remote body manipulation, remote pain induction and much more!
Originally posted by Xcathdra
ELF - Extremely Low Frequencies - Wiki
3-30Htz is the range for the ELF.
Dulce Base, NM - Supposed Genetics Lab / Alien Base / Cooperation Montauk Base, NY - Psychological Wafare testing / experimentation
Originally posted by luxordelphi
I never signed a consent form but I guess that is moot since I won this small semi-nano battle.
About examiner.com
Examiner.com is the inside source for everything local. We are powered by Examiners, the largest pool of knowledgeable and passionate contributors in the world. Examiners provide unique and original content to enhance life in your local city wherever that may be.
Write for examiner.com.
Examiners come from all walks of life and contribute original content to entertain, inform, and inspire their readers. They are credible, passionate and influential because of their knowledge of a particular topic. Want to join their ranks? Become an Examiner
After 20 articles, I only made $10, which they're not going to give me.
Examiner.com is only taking advantage of people in a down economy to get free work done for them. I noticed later that many of the examiners only have about ten articles each themselves. Should've taken the hint.
Can you prove that implants aren't being done to unsuspecting people?
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
reply to post by sticky
Can you prove that implants aren't being done to unsuspecting people?
Perhaps you are not aware how a burden of proof works... When someone makes a claim THEY are responsible for providing proof. When we have a radical claim like the one made by this thread there is even greater burden of proof than for some mundane claim. For instance if I said:
I had a sandwich for lunch
and
I was abducted by government agents and micro-chipped
Which would you be more likely to believe? Hopefully the first one. As such the Examiner article doesn't offer anything in the way of proof and as Dereks has pointed out the court case wasn't even regarding micro-chips at all. It does, however, mention "electronic harassment".
Court Recognizes Electronic Harassment
If someone makes a claim someone else can be skeptical of it without accepting a burden of proof to "disprove" the claim.
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
Perhaps you are not aware how a burden of proof works... When someone makes a claim THEY are responsible for providing proof.