It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jeddun
reply to post by Asktheanimals
Jesus dude...micro nuke? really? i was there THAT day and saw the whole thing go down.......there was no micro nuke. Bit of stretch there guy. Micro nuke would insinuate radioactive fallout and MUCH higher heat within the blast area, meanwhile i was literally on COURT street when it happened....i SAW the jet i SAW it ram into the bldg i SAW the hysteria and i SAW the people jumping from the burning skyscraper...as well as a blinding flash etc etc etc....furthermore to even suggest that 'thermite', people have since come to LOVE this word as i NEVER heard of it prior to this charade, was 'sprayed' on the structure when 'fire proofing' was done is absurd.
Christ can't anyone live with the fact that there are people, no organized GROUPS of people, who hate the west????! and leave this conspiracy theory where it belongs...laying right beside that beat to death and beyond horse?
Originally posted by projectnsearch
The micro nukes would have been 10 stories under the foundations
This was the plan for those buildings all along because of their super rigid structures couldn't be safely taken down by high explosives in the building footprint.
Nothing else turns steel to DUST!
when there is TONS of evidence for the micro nuke.
very center of the molten core
They were pulling molten steel out of the hole for months.
And finally, they didn't call it "Ground Zero" for nothing! Look it up in the dictionary and it will say "The area immediately above or below a NUCLEAR explosion.
because our government had to FILE that plan with the Russians as that was protocol for either super power to use their demolition nukes!
Originally posted by impressme
they can’t stand holes poke in their fairytales
Originally posted by impressme
Most people do not believe in those ridiculous conspiracies, nice try in lumping ALL people who are inquiring about the truth.
Originally posted by hooper
Do these people have any clue what constitutes and "experiment" as opposed to what we see here which would be more accuratley described as "backyard performance art"?
Do you think they have any clue as to how or what science actually involves?
Originally posted by hooper
Wow, just watched some of these videos. It is amazing what some people will pass off as an "experiment"! Putting a random I-beam in a bonfire with a little wallboard and somehow we are supposed to be stupid enough to believe that is related to the conditions on 9/11! They are kidding, right?
Do these people have any clue what constitutes and "experiment" as opposed to what we see here which would be more accuratley described as "backyard performance art"? Do you think they have any clue as to how or what science actually involves? 10 min videos of bonfires does not constitute an "experiment" unless the subject is bonfires!