Top secret anti-gravity craft hit World Trade Center (hoax topic)

reply to post by Asktheanimals


There are no possibilities to entertain. This thread is embarrassing to the collective intelligence of ATS.

IRM

Originally posted by InfaRedMan
reply to post by Asktheanimals

 

There are no possibilities to entertain. This thread is embarrassing to the collective intelligence of ATS.

IRM

I don't know - aren't airplanes kind of anti-gravity machines? Just sayin'.

reply to post by davidmann


Care to explain what Tim McVeigh had to do with 9/11 ?

Or , do you just expect all of us less enlightened folks to figure it out through your cryptic posts ?


[edit on 13-8-2010 by okbmd]

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

same thing?

The number of people who apparently want to believe this conspiracy fakery is indeed both astounding and utterly disheartening for those concerned with truth.

These people are spreading lies.

Let me repeat that for clarity: They are spreading lies. Apparently in same attention-seeking fashion as those who create fake UFO photos and footage.

Please visit this link: September 11 Television Archive for the actual live footage from the major networks. You'll notice the actual live coverage is different from what is claimed in these videos. And those with camera angles wide enough, clearly show a passenger jet with wings.


Perhaps we should see this and related threads moved to the hoax forum, which is still a locale too good for their ilk.

It is understandable that many of you find this to be utter nonsense, but can we discredit the theory? It does explain some small anomalies within MSM footage, but in the end does not give us the definite answer we all seek.

ATS is the place to discuss such topics/evidence without be scoffed at. Yet, ATS members are calling other members kooks/nuts.

Also, why is it that a few of you believe that the MSM video archives are 100% accurate? Couldn't the MSM fake the videos? If you are having a discussion with people who are skeptical of the MSM, why would you use them as a source to debunk a theory?

We need evidence to say whether or not this is a feesable theory...... I'm also waiting for evidence that 19 Middle-Eastern men hijacked the planes. Bet many of you naysayers believe that one!

Edit: changed text to make sense



[edit on 13-8-2010 by sheepslayer247]

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
It does explain some small anomalies within MSM footage,

It does explain the fools and con-men who attempt detailed analysis of low-quality highly-compressed streaming Internet videos.

ATS is the place to discuss such topics/evidence without be scoffed at.

I will scoff and ridicule anyone who attempts this level of analysis on anything but the original high-quality video.

Couldn't the MSM fake the videos?

Certainly. But the large number of people required to be "in" on such a massively scaled real-time "special effect" becomes staggering the more you consider it and the number of cameras direct at the towers. Not to mention the large number of people who have seen both planes from a wide range of angles.

In my opinion, it's folly of the most ridiculous kind to entertain these conspiracy fakery con-men.

reply to post by SUICIDEHK45


This is the first time I have seen this, thanks for posting. The truth is slowly coming out, and the Elite have no place to hide anymore. The greatest attack on American soil was perpetrated by people who are running our Nation today from behind the scenes.

THere is a video on youtube with a family in a high rise filming the whole thing after the first plane hit, they mention the second plane looked like a military plane.

reply to post by mister.old.school


What would these fools have to gain from the manipulation of crappy videos? Is there a ton of fame and money in fake 9/11 videos?

If the original video is in the hands of people we don't trust, and the video looks to be manipulated from the start, how can we trust the original as well?

The MSM and the government can easily fake videos and keep it under tight wraps do to compartmentalization. It has been, and still is, used in every part of government and corporate practices today.

I think we have to open to other theories until the absolute truth is revealed. If you believe the bill of goods we have been sold by the government, MSM and the 9/11 commision, then I would not trust your judgement as well. The official story of 9/11 is a much a fantasy as any other theory.



[edit on 13-8-2010 by sheepslayer247]

Misleading information is just as bad as ignorance.

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
What would these fools have to gain from the manipulation of crappy videos? Is there a ton of fame and money in fake 9/11 videos?

Those of a sound mind often have difficulty fathoming the motivations of those who are not. What motivates one to create a false UFO sighting with photos and videos?

I'm certain that there are those who create fabrications as an effort to reinforce their misguided system of belief. They want very much to believe in fantastical explanations for the minutiae of these events. And when they cannot find evidence to support their beliefs, they create it.

If the original video is in the hands of people we don't trust, and the video looks to be manipulated from the start, how can we trust the original as well?

Have you seen the original? What part looks to be manipulated?

Have you lost trust in the creator of these videos now that you know he misrepresented what was "live" shots? If those creating these videos lie about something so important, what else have they lied about?

The MSM and the government can easily fake videos and keep it under tight wraps do to compartmentalization.

Can you speculate on how "easy" it would be to inject those videos into every camera of every production team of every news network carrying live coverage? Including doing what it takes to fool those reporting on live radio?

Do you expect us to believe that every professional cameraman of the networks was either "in" on it, or didn't notice that their cameras weren't reporting on what was actually happening and never said anything?

I think we have to open to other theories until the absolute truth is revealed.

That is where you are wrong, and your statement is indicative of the "disease" that has infected this and many other conspiracy theories. We should not, must not, remain open to the ridiculous. Proper investigative technique requires us to discard the absurd so as not to drop eyes off the ball.

WOW!!!!!!


i shouldnt need a second line for this!


/gullible

[edit on 13-8-2010 by n00bUK]

Sometimes I think the debunkers of 9/11 make these kinda posts just to make truthers look foolish... I mean come on, you believe it was anti-gravity machines that hit the towers....

I'm all for the 9/11 conspiracy but this is ridiculous. But then again, I'm not gonna PRETEND to know, for all we know, it could've been... so whatever...

It just sounds kinda outlandish to me that they'd build a technology like anti-gravity vehicals JUST so they could fly them into a tower and blow 'em up...

God, that's all so sad. Really.

Instead of focusing on the real issues with the 9/11 attacks useless crap like this is spread by some disinfo agents - or are they just silly?

This "startling" new discovery for me is 10 steps backwards where we only can go baby steps anyway.

I am 100% convinced that the official 9/11 story is not only fishy... it stinks like a ton of rotten eels.

But stuff like this one destroys any REAL effort to find out what really happened that day. Stuff like this will make people who MIGHT have been open minded enough to MAYBE look into that topic again to simply RUN away with crazy laughter.

Please stop spreading such disinfo # or I might get really angry.

Support the truth, not the bull. Period.

Originally posted by vanhippi
Sometimes I think the debunkers of 9/11 make these kinda posts just to make truthers look foolish... I mean come on, you believe it was anti-gravity machines that hit the towers....

I'm all for the 9/11 conspiracy but this is ridiculous. But then again, I'm not gonna PRETEND to know, for all we know, it could've been... so whatever...

It just sounds kinda outlandish to me that they'd build a technology like anti-gravity vehicals JUST so they could fly them into a tower and blow 'em up...

Just to have fun with this - if America did have anti-gravity technology doesn't that alone kind of turn all politics on its head? Why would you fake a terrorist activity as a pre-text to invade an oil rich country? I mean, unless the ant-gravity machines were diesel powered once that technology exsits then Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, etc just go back to what they were in the beginning of the 19th century, remote desert nations. Just havin' some fun with it.

Really?...let me say again...REALLY? Thank for discrediting the 9/11 movement even more

I got gradually angrier as the video played.

And thus all attempts to analyse the events are discredited by the growing number of these fools. I await eagerly the "The towers were never actually there" theory series of videos. Holographic projections beamed from the moon directly into our minds it was. It is so saddening and frustrating.

It is easy to discredit. It is saddening to see so many people actually treating this as even remotely worthy of viewing.

Originally posted by SUICIDEHK45
Here is a link to a video where there is an alleged top secret remote controlled anti-gravity craft that was used by TPTB to conduct the 9/11 attacks. The person in this video seems to be a very strong believer that the government was involved in the attacks on the WTC.

Top secret anti-gravity craft hit World Trade Center

When I saw the clip of the "alleged anti-gravity craft" it did seem to look much different than any clip of the attacks that are shown in the MSM. What are your thoughts on this video?

I did a search for this and was unable to find anything on ATS about it. Has it already made the rounds here?

These guys disagree...

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/d5b920bcb071.jpg[/atsimg]

[edit on 13-8-2010 by RMFX1]

reply to post by mister.old.school


You make some very good points, and I would say that it is probably not within my area of knowledge to properly do the issue justice. I was simply trying to convey the point that it seems possible that the official story of 9/11 could have been manipulated. As far as the logistics of how it was done....I don't know. And I will not try to pretend that I do.

I will disagree that we must toss out any theory that seems silly. To me, and many others in the world, the finding of the 9/11 commision, and the investigators of events like the OKC bombing, are ridiculous in and of itself. How could McVeigh blow the entire front side of a building clean off with a truck full of nitromethane and fertilizer? I don't buy it and the science does not point to the truck being the only cause of the explosion. Should we throw out their findings since I find their results impossible? No, there is a bit of truth to their theory, and their may be a bit of truth in the crazy theories as well.

If we dismiss any theory that we personally feel may be outrageous, then we limit our range of thought into the entire investigation.

It always seems impossible until its done.

Nelson Mandela

Impossible is a word to be found only in the dictionary of fools.

Napoleon Bonaparte