It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hinky
I've read the thread, laughed at some of the responses from the Holocaust deniers. You guys really are cheap entertainment.
This was touched on, but I really hoped it was carried further.
Hair, clothing, personal property collected in bulk has been mentioned.
Anyone here have a clue why Swiss coins contain mercury? Yeah, this is a fact, even the Swiss now admit it. Germany doesn't strike me as a huge gold producer. Now, I wonder....
Originally posted by hinky
reply to post by NichirasuKenshin
You should probably check your collection of Vrenelis dated 1935-L which were minted in 1945-47.
Originally posted by Yissachar1
reply to post by NichirasuKenshin
How old are you?
X
Originally posted by zcflint05
reply to post by stars15k
Unfortunatley, to the type of disgusting slime that post these threads, yes, all of the above would be okay. And probably more. And the reason why it's okay is because it's Jews. That is the only reason. These type of people spend all day dreaming of ways to deny the Holocaust because they have a boner for Nazi Germany, or Islam, or something.
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
reply to post by elfulanozutan0
He has some valid points, but my opinion, when I watched them years ago, was that he leaned far to hard to the other side. The truth, as usual, is somewhere in the middle.
[edit on 8/7/2010 by ~Lucidity]
Originally posted by Kram09
reply to post by filosophia
I knew you were going to mention that!
That's hardly evidence of windows actually throughout the chamber is it? That's what I meant by windows.
Of course there was a window on the door, so they could check to make sure all the prisoners were dead and also so some doctors and the like could observe the gassings and see how effective it was, how long it took them to die etc.
Originally posted by filosophia
reply to post by NichirasuKenshin
news flash: I think for myself, and don't listen to the "godfather of revision" who by the way I've never heard before. I already gave you my reasons as to why the letter is most definitely a forgery and so if you are going to ignore that then I am through talking to you.