It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Nite_wing
This judge basically stated that if there is a federal law dealing with an issue, then the states cannot take it on themselves to enforce that law.
If I was a drug lawyer, the first thing I would do for my client is to file a motion to dismiss my client's state drug charge since the federal statutes classify the controlled substances and the states have no right to pre-empt federal enforcement.
I think this would be an interesting issue.
Originally posted by NthOther
If I was a Mexican working for a Walmart in Mexico, trying to support a family, and had the chance to utilize my skills in another economy where I could earn an enormous amount more money, I would jump that fence (no matter how tall it is or what its made of). You wouldn't?
Originally posted by Gigatronix
While a "small" percentage of them may do the things you mentioned, 100% of illegal aliens are criminals. If they were not here, that "small" % would be 0%. So any percent is too much.
Originally posted by cdesigns
I understand that some of the illegal people here, steal, kill and do other bad things, but that's a very low % compared to all the mexican people that are in the US
[edit on 28-7-2010 by cdesigns]
And seriously, friend, I would advise laying off the superiority complex you appear to be on. It doesn't help you at all, unless you are purposely trying to get flamed.
Just sayin....
Originally posted by mryanbrown
Originally posted by Gigatronix
reply to post by mryanbrown
So you would support a law that deported illegals and took all neccessary steps to prevent more from coming, as long as it didn't effect the rights of citizens?
Pretty much. As long as people learn what "crime" is. And that crossing the border is not a "crime". And that someone must be committing an actual "crime" to interfere with them period.
And if they aren't engaged in an actual CRIME then you have no lawful reason to even attempt to determine legal status.
Lawful is not legal. Illegal does not mean crime. But crimes are illegal and unlawful. Once you can get the basics of that, you'll know what I mean.
A crime involves an injured party.
And the asinine excuses of "They steal services my taxes paid for" does not create an injured party.
Not racist at all, nope. My wife is philipino, my previous serious relationship was with a black girl, and my sister is half mexican. I grew up with mexicans, I know what their good qualities are and their bad qualities. We established after I made that post that coming into the country illegally is not a criminal offense. However that doesn't change the fact that every person that does it, does it knowing that its considered wrong in our country and against our laws. They may not be bona fide "criminals" but the gap between the two is very narrow.
Originally posted by cdesigns
not 100% illegal aliens are criminals, you must be the most racist person on this forum.
That is probably true, but, sorry, he still is breaking the law and doing something he knows is wrong.
And there a lot of people like him here in the US.
Well the illegals may not be criminals but your friend certainly is.
I know a person who currently rents his house bedrooms to illegal people, and helps them with jobs on his company, he had only good things to say about them, so please dont call 100% of the illegal aliens criminals.
You made gross generalizations about one race while making positive generalizations about your own. Doesn't fly. Laziness is not exclusive to any particular race, just like racism....
And regarding about "My" Superiority complex...
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by endisnighe
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
So what do you call, in just Arizona alone, 300,000-360,000 people coming over the border per year?
Where 17% of those caught have been convicted of violent crime in the US.
Oh, it is just what then?
I call that people moving to where they can provide for their family...and with any group of people...you have your good ones and your bad ones.
I don't call it an Invasion...I don't use scary words in an attempt to alter viewpoints based on fear.
And what an invasion force it is...farmers and construction workers...who actually farm and do construction work. Those are some fierce soldiers.
Originally posted by oniongrass
Originally posted by Logarock ... The Mexicans are the first majior wave of immigrants to this nation that find the trees ripe with fruit already. In many parts of this country we dont have to care what they think and certianly if they are not citizens. ...
The first sentence is a very good point. Earlier immigrants didn't have all these social programs, bilingualism, etc. They had to hurry up and work, and hurry to learn English. What we gave them was the opportunity to do it, that's all. And we had plenty of jobs, not a shortage of them.
The second statement I hope is true. Maybe outside the District of the judge who made this ruling. Anyway, God speed.
Originally posted by Crimson_King
reply to post by Intelearthling
Good job for the judge in diluting the racist law which would have enabled racist officials to harass and hound people on base of how they look. Kudos to the judge for keeping up with the constitution. If all the illegals should be kept out then this land will only belong to native Indians. The judge ruling was in par with the constitution of not harassing citizens of the country based on their looks.
Originally posted by FIFIGI
Corporations are allowed to immigrate legally in search for resources, cheap labor and weak legislation, but people are stuck in farms for ever.
Shame on USA and their illusionary idea of freedom. Freedom for chosen ones