It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by airspoon
reply to post by ImaginaryReality1984
Putting her in PC, I can some-what understand. But if they were truly worried about protecting human life, then they would do the same for that one white person in a cell block with all black people or the next child molestor, of the average Joe type. They don't start these people off with giving them the luxury single cell and locking the prison down everytime they feel like taking a walk or having a visit.
Originally posted by airspoon
Furthermore, how do you explain the visits that she is getting around the clock, basically whenever she feels like it? How do you exlpain the fact that she isn't getting stripped searched in front of everyone, as they do everyone else, even those in PC.
Originally posted by airspoon
I don't think that anyone should get special treatment in jail, regardless of whether you are a bigger target or not. Apparently, they don't give this same special treatment to others with the same target stapled on their chests.
--airspoon
As for the one white person among a black population well the argument would be that it's not a certainty whereas there is a certainty she'll be assaulted.
Originally posted by airspoon
reply to post by ImaginaryReality1984
As for the one white person among a black population well the argument would be that it's not a certainty whereas there is a certainty she'll be assaulted.
On the contrary. American prison systems (at least in the west) are devided among racial lines and not because of system rules, rather due to inmate rules. In fact, I would venture to say that a white person in a cell with all black people, is much more likely to be assaulted than a celebrity in GP. Really though it's kind of irrelevant as it is clear that this woman, along with the guy who is the focus of the thread, recieved preferential treatmant due to their "status".
--airspoon
Originally posted by airspoon
I'm sorry, but the average Joe would not get the same treatment, irregardless of whether they bribed their victims. No, average Joe would get sent to prison, then sewed. I dare the average Joe to try and pay off their victims, they will only get sent to prison anyway, with charges added.
Originally posted by TrueBrit
reply to post by IandEye
Wait a moment if you please. Saying anger about this subject amounts to closet desire to BE the subject of our ire, is like saying that being happy adolf hitler is dead makes you a nazi!
You are talking nonsense. Much of the real anger directed at this sort of degenerate comes from knowing people who have been abused, and being livid that the abuser has recieved little punishment if any, as occurs in many circumstances. Its the same anger which is directed at peadophile preists, foster carers who damage thier wards, and fathers who corrupt thier own young like in the Fritzl case.
If you really believe that negative emotional response to a frankly sickening crime, and the criminal who commits it, is an indication of some repressed peadophilia, I think you might be in need of a serious look at your own psyche, since your reasoning is utterly flawed and without any merit what so ever.
Originally posted by IandEye
where were these young girls' parents?