It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gmoneycricket
Cap a Leak and Trade for a New Leak
Sounds like that Cap and Trade Bill
Now I understand.
Rep. Ed Markey, who has been a vocal critic of BP's response to the gusher, said Sunday that the company could have another motivation for wanting to keep the well capped. "If the well remains fully shut in until the relief well is completed, we may never have a fully accurate determination of the flow rate from this well. If so, BP -- which has consistently underestimated the flow rate -- might evade billions of dollars of fines," Markey said in a letter to Allen released Sunday.
Originally posted by soleprobe
Originally posted by Come Clean
Yet, you guys still support deep water drilling. Yet you guys still don't support agressive measures (taxes) to get us off fossil fuels.
Taxes? you mean carbon taxes... Cap n' Trade? And shut down drilling? Wow ... that should help America right now. More taxes and less jobs... Of course it's good for global warming... a nice colder planet... just what the Americans need when they're sleeping out in the streets.... Why don't you run for office? That's if you're an American.
Originally posted by Blazer
Allen, in a letter to BP Chief Managing Director Bob Dudley, directs BP to provide a written procedure for restarting flow from the well if oil seepage near the wellhead is confirmed.
Originally posted by jlafleur02
I would think that BP is trying to force the goverments hand in this.
...
Suttles' comments carved out an important piece of turf for BP: If Allen sticks with the containment plan and oil again pours forth into the Gulf, even briefly, it will be the government's doing, not BP's.
Originally posted by PurpleDog UK
Does anyone have a 'fix' on the number of barrels lost / leaked into the GoM?
I was told that BP are liable for each barrel leaked and therefore based on 85 days at 80,000 barrels per day and a fine of $4300 per barrel that should be ....
$29,240,000,000 as a fine currently....... am I right here ??
If they cannot quanitify what's being lost via the seabed then their fine will not get bigger ??
Regards
PurpleDOG UK
Originally posted by Mercenary2007
reply to post by Come Clean
i'm sorry but us Americans aren't the only ones that still use oil. little hypocritical on your part to lay the blame solely on the American people don't you think.
yes we Americans wanted BP to cap the well but you know what we wanted them to do it PROPERLY!!!!!!!!!! NOT in a way that protects their bottom line and hides the truth about just how much oil has been leaked into the GULF BY A COMPANY THAT IS MOSTLY BRITISH OWNED!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by PurpleDog UK
I think that's why your President O has stopped using 'British' in BP...
Regards
PurpleDOG UK