It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I don't believe that I condone murder exactly
I definitely see a difference between the two situations. However, they aren't exactly germane to this discussion. I, originally, advocated the US government making hard choices and ignoring their own personal beliefs if it were for the greater good of the people. In both of those hypothetical cases I was aware of the rape. I'd feel obligated to report it. Unfortunately, as far as the US is concerned, there are more than two people affected. It's not just the raper and the raped, there are a large number of comparatively innocent people involved. Sometimes reporting the truth is irresponsible and turning a blind eye is the right thing to do. A more apt analogy would be saying that the rapist had a button that would detonate nukes all over the world if he were reported. Is it still the right thing to do to report him, or is letting the truth out irresponsible?
Originally posted by LittleSecret
It was American interests to support Saddam right? Give Saddam WMD/Chem/bio weapons to use against Iran right? But here is a question, if you have no clue why your government does anything, how can you take situations such as the Iraq war/Iran/Iraq war lightly and not ask any questions?
Seventeen British companies who supplied Iraq with nuclear, biological, chemical, rocket and conventional weapons technology are to be investigated and could face prosecution following a Sunday Herald investigation. One of the companies is International Military Services, a part of the Ministry of Defence, which sold rocket technology to Iraq.
The companies were named by Iraq in a 12,000 page dossier submitted to the UN in December. The Security Council agreed to US requests to censor 8000 pages — including sections naming western businesses which aided Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programme.
The US did support Saddam but was not the only one supplying him. Did you ever wonder where exactly all that Soviet/Russian equipment came from that they used in their defense against the US and Allies?
If the rapist had a button which would detonate nukes all around the world, the rapist should be stopped.
No one would care if the US send a special ops to Germany to kill Hitler, even if it was illegal. Heck the Shias/Kurds in Iraq even asked the US to help kill Saddam during the uprise.
But it was American interests right?
It was American interests to support Saddam right? Give Saddam WMD/Chem/bio weapons to use against Iran right?
But here is a question, if you have no clue why your government does anything, how can you take situations such as the Iraq war/Iran/Iraq war lightly and not ask any questions?
Can you argue that your government can/could do horrifying things like Hitler and use national Interests to avoid accountability?
Germans turned a blind eye in regards to Jews being prosecuted, right? Do you believe they thought it was in regards to German interests?
Exactly my point. Stop him using whatever means necessary to protect Americas interests.
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to post by Mayson
Exactly my point. Stop him using whatever means necessary to protect Americas interests.
Let me get your argument straight:
So you are saying it is OK to allow someone (with a nuke suicide vest) to rape your daughter, as long as he doesn't press the button which would kill everyone else?
Is that your argument?