It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: Ove38
I did a whole series on this book.
The events are not arbitrary. They are God's reaction to the world's treatment of the church.
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: Ove38
I think I have a more complete interpretation, but it would take a whole series of threads to expound it.
q.v.
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: oeilitt
My own explanation, as provided in the full thread series (q.v.) is simpler and more straightforward- and yet also, I suggest, more complete.
Revelation
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: oeilitt
Each post has a summary at the end, but I can share with you the draft foreword of the eventual book;
+++
But which church? On the one hand, the immediate answer would have to be “the church of the Roman empire”. Like every other prophet in the Bible, John is addressing the people of his own time, in the first instance. When he speaks to them in the first chapter, he says “I share with you the tribulation and the patient endurance.” Their bad experience began with Nero’s vindictive treatment of the Christians in Rome (A.D.64), and came to a climax in the grand campaign (A.D. 302-311) set in motion by Diocletian. John will be referring to Nero’s persecution, or to something a little later like the troubles of Domitian’s reign.
................
................
I believe the answer to the conundrum is that John is addressing both churches at the same time. There are two troubled Christian communities, two oppressive regimes, two periods of tribulation, and two triumphant victories of God over a persecuting world. One set for the church of the Roman empire, and the other set for the future church. I shall keep referring to these two functions, so I had better label them as the First Message and the Second Message.
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: oeilitt
My own explanation, as provided in the full thread series (q.v.) is simpler and more straightforward- and yet also, I suggest, more complete.
Revelation