It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

VIDEO: FBI Shows Up At Protesters House And Asks Strange Questions! Must Watch!

page: 16
120
<< 13  14  15    17  18  19 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 07:21 AM
link   
reply to post by jfj123
 




I'm just going to address the last part since the rest is so silly, I can't bring myself to respond


Most Feds can't.




The actors did not commit a federal crime. Actors pretend to be FBI all the time. Ever hear of The X-files ?


You might think is ok to impersonate a Fed, but I assure you that if you do, you are committing a Federal Crime which could lead to your imprisonment in a Federal Prison. It's not a Joke.



The 2 primary characters were FBI agents. Are they in jail now ? Nope.


That's what I believe as Well...

The 2 primary people in the video were legitimate Fed, no crime of impersonation was committed. which is why they will not be going to jail.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 07:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by OurskiesRpoisoned
reply to post by jfj123
 


Wow, 25 posts in this thread alone!

Are you a cop?


Just curious but why would you ask that?

Do I look like a cop?



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 07:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by K J Gunderson
reply to post by jfj123
 


Would you mind terribly if I ask why you seem to be going out of your way to ignore the evidence proving the female as a US Marshal?


It looks like she may be a campus cop but I haven't seen where she is actually a US Marshal. Maybe I missed it. If I did, could you repost it ? thanks.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 07:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by jfj123

Originally posted by OurskiesRpoisoned
reply to post by jfj123
 


Wow, 25 posts in this thread alone!

Are you a cop?


Just curious but why would you ask that?

Do I look like a cop?


Well, if you were a cop, it would explain your complete and utter lack of credibility.

[edit on 13-6-2010 by OurskiesRpoisoned]



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 07:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by jfj123

Originally posted by K J Gunderson
reply to post by jfj123
 


Would you mind terribly if I ask why you seem to be going out of your way to ignore the evidence proving the female as a US Marshal?


It looks like she may be a campus cop but I haven't seen where she is actually a US Marshal. Maybe I missed it. If I did, could you repost it ? thanks.


Don't forget that I showed you she is a member of the Central Texas Crime Prevention Association.



The Central Texas Crime Prevention Association (CTCPA) consists of law enforcement officers, city officials, crime prevention specialists, concerned business representatives and citizens that are dedicated to reducing the opportunity for crime.

ctxcpa.com...

Reducing the opportunity for crime??

No wonder they were there asking about crimes that had not yet been committed.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 07:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by Izarith
reply to post by jfj123
 



1. Do you actually think the FBI has the time and/or resources to view every youtube video?



Yes....

Google is being sued by the whole of the EU over privacy infringement as we speak.

Because the EU and FBI are the same thing? And did they happen upon a video they didn't like or did they actually search all of google?


Cisco systems is providing China with state of the art tech to oppress the freedom of it's people in one of the most unprecedented manners ever witnessed by human eyes.

It's not that hard buddy?

Actually it is that hard. It's easy to block a file but not the contents of files. As example, it's easy to block a file named Ironman but not every frame of the movie Ironman. Big difference.


America forced telephone and cellular companies to tape Americans illegaly and unconstitutionally.

I'm aware. They use search algorithms to process audio, file names, text, etc.. but it's much harder to process a frame of every movie clip on the internet.


These Feds spend millions on busting Strip Bars because the girls make a few extra bucks for collage by getting their boobs felt up.

Yep they have nothing else better to do then bust strip clubs that are staying within the bounds of the law



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 07:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by Izarith
reply to post by jfj123
 


I'm just going to address the last part since the rest is so silly, I can't bring myself to respond



Most Feds can't.

Oh I love this part. This is where, because I disagree with you, you must imply I am a Fed. Yep much easier to do instead of agree to disagree. I could just as easily say that you might be an undercover Fed trying to cozy up to people to get info. This is one of the lamest things anyone can do here on ATS-Accuse someone of being a Fed or imaginary disinfo agent to discredit them and try and bolster your argument.



The actors did not commit a federal crime. Actors pretend to be FBI all the time. Ever hear of The X-files ?



You might think is ok to impersonate a Fed, but I assure you that if you do, you are committing a Federal Crime which could lead to your imprisonment in a Federal Prison. It's not a Joke.

So all actors who are pretending to be FBI agents will be/are/have committed a federal crime? And they are all now imprisoned? Wow the jails must be full of actors right now. You're talking literally thousands and thousands of actors who are jailed. uh no....not the case.



The 2 primary characters were FBI agents. Are they in jail now ? Nope.


That's what I believe as Well...

The 2 primary people in the video were legitimate Fed, no crime of impersonation was committed. which is why they will not be going to jail.
But the 2 actors in the X-files are in jail? When did that happen?



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 08:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by OurskiesRpoisoned
Originally posted by jfj123
Originally posted by OurskiesRpoisoned
reply to post by jfj123
 


Just curious but why would you ask that?

Do I look like a cop?



Well, if you were a cop, it would explain your complete and utter lack of credibility.

[edit on 13-6-2010 by OurskiesRpoisoned]


Oh you mean how I am a skeptical person and refuse to take all things as complete truth without even looking into it a bit first?



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 08:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by OurskiesRpoisoned

Don't forget that I showed you she is a member of the Central Texas Crime Prevention Association.




The Central Texas Crime Prevention Association (CTCPA) consists of law enforcement officers, city officials, crime prevention specialists, concerned business representatives and citizens that are dedicated to reducing the opportunity for crime.

ctxcpa.com...
committed.

So you don't need to be an actual officer to belong to this?

According to what you posted, you can also be:
A concerned business representative.
A citizen.
A city official (ie clerk at the county office).
A crime prevention specialist (they have online schools for this).



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 08:04 AM
link   
reply to post by hawkiye
 


Try to look at it from the FBI's point of view.

Everytime a terrorist attack takes place, innocent people are hurt. Don't matter if it's a Govt target or not, people die or are maimed for life. Whats the best way to stop a terror atack? Find the culprits before they act...!!

Protests are a regular hang-out for scouts working for terror organisations, looking for anyone who might suit their needs. Protests are a very emotionally driven event and it's considered an easy place to find an unstable wanna-be martyr.

I think it's a matter of following every lead in the hope of having something come togeather, that can stop a potential attack and sometimes innocent people get caught up in the quest to find the real thing.

Don't blame em, they're just doing their job and trying to protect you.

What if these guys just sat on their hands and this protest was the staging ground for a terror attack that actually went ahead and killed 5,000 innocent people? Wouldn't you then be blaming these feds for not doing anything to stop it?

Sheesh, the poor feds just cant win, they are the bad guys if they try to root out evil by questioning everyone there and they're the bad guys if they do nothing and a real attack takes place.

Why don't you ppls stop complaining about your imaginary NWO, Marshal Law, Big Brother, Zionist takeover, Anti-Christ, Banana Republic and focus on the real issues that need attention.

The Federal Police are not a threat to the people or freedom of your country. The People of your country are a threat to your country and your freedom. Your own paranoia is whats going to push some unstable people into acting against their own intrests and force the government to defend the rest of the normal people from you.

If Martial Law were ever to set in, it will be the fault of the fringe society freaks who go over the edge with their paranoia and do something stupid.

[edit on 6/13/2010 by Ironclad]



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 08:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ironclad
If Martial Law were ever to set in, it will be the fault of the fringe society freaks who go over the edge with their paranoia and do something stupid.


Unfortunately, those fringe society freaks end up in the government, or police force, or lifetime military.

Meantime, the rest of us work, creating something useful for other people, earning a living at the same time.

And we pay taxes. And it concerns me that the government is looking for "potential" crimes when they have warehouses FULL of unsolved crimes.

And we have people who have committed REAL crimes, running around, many of them being paid informants for the FBI, CIA, NSA, etc.

I say, quit spending our hard earned money on propaganda in these forums and thought police in the real world. Maybe a quick review of the movie "Minority Report" is in order?



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 08:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by jfj123




So you don't need to be an actual officer to belong to this?

According to what you posted, you can also be:
A concerned business representative.
A citizen.
A city official (ie clerk at the county office).
A crime prevention specialist (they have online schools for this).


You do realize impersonating a Federal Officer is a HUGE CRIME???

Even if she's just a university cop, this would be a Federal Offense for her to do this.

Are you suggesting this? If you are a cop, you should do your job and go arrest her.



[edit on 13-6-2010 by OurskiesRpoisoned]



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 08:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by jfj123

Originally posted by K J Gunderson
reply to post by jfj123
 


Would you mind terribly if I ask why you seem to be going out of your way to ignore the evidence proving the female as a US Marshal?


It looks like she may be a campus cop but I haven't seen where she is actually a US Marshal. Maybe I missed it. If I did, could you repost it ? thanks.


Well this was only posted 3,4, or 5 times


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/00d4b2984c83.jpg[/atsimg]



Do not think I am starting an argument here. I am still a bit open about this but I did not see this explained away and it did seem like you were really trying hard to pretend you did not see it. If I missed something, please show me.

[edit on 13-6-2010 by K J Gunderson]



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 08:43 AM
link   
reply to post by jfj123
 




Because the EU and FBI are the same thing? And did they happen upon a video they didn't like or did they actually search all of google?


Google is a corporation. One that obviously has sold it's services to some one who required information over in the EU.

What do you honestly think google is being sued by the EU for privacy infringement because google did it just because? No they did it as a service to who ever paid google to do it. That's what corporations do.

You think the FBI can't contract google to do it's searching for them? You think they are not doing that as we type?



Actually it is that hard. It's easy to block a file but not the contents of files. As example, it's easy to block a file named Ironman but not every frame of the movie Ironman. Big difference.


This is as silly as believing that it actually takes 30 seconds for the feds to trace a taped call lol.

What you say is the typical fed tactic of underrating the technical abilities of Federal law enforcement by saying we can't do that.

When clearly YouTube can take a file called "GEDBVSDFBSGrrbscdcbreb@#$@" and use voice algo thats on most common day public cell phones to know that the file is actualy a Lady GAGA song.

And this is just YouTube trying to stop copy right infringement.

Just imagin what YouTube/Google can pick up on any file no matter what the file name.



I'm aware. They use search algorithms to process audio, file names, text, etc.. but it's much harder to process a frame of every movie clip on the internet.


Sure it is...


Much harder does not mean they can't do it.

But in any event, most files have plenty of audio just like the video in the OP.



Yep they have nothing else better to do then bust strip clubs that are staying within the bounds of the law



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 08:44 AM
link   
What I found odd about this video was how CALM this woman was. And how she thought carefully to go grab her video camera to film the agents.

If agents showed up to my door, I'd be shaking, and my voice would reflect that. And the last thing I'd be thinking about is getting my camera out.

Not sure what to think.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 08:53 AM
link   
reply to post by jfj123
 




Oh I love this part. This is where, because I disagree with you, you must imply I am a Fed. Yep much easier to do instead of agree to disagree. I could just as easily say that you might be an undercover Fed trying to cozy up to people to get info. This is one of the lamest things anyone can do here on ATS-Accuse someone of being a Fed or imaginary disinfo agent to discredit them and try and bolster your argument.


Well it's just that you obviously took what I said personally, instead of worrying about your tax dollars being waisted as would be the normal reaction of a none Fed.

You could be a Fed.

Or at least some one employed in some type of Internet damage control for when things like in the OP happen...I don't know.



So all actors who are pretending to be FBI agents will be/are/have committed a federal crime? And they are all now imprisoned? Wow the jails must be full of actors right now. You're talking literally thousands and thousands of actors who are jailed. uh no....not the case.


If only they would pass a law that would prohibit feds from impersonating ATS poster in the Internet.

then the jails would be full of actors.




But the 2 actors in the X-files are in jail? When did that happen?


It's getting old dude.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 09:15 AM
link   
reply to post by Izarith
 


They gave permission for her to record the interview. They did not give her permission to post it on youtube. This woman is SO much toast... and quit making excuses for the inexcusable.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 09:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by OurskiesRpoisoned
Originally posted by jfj123

So you don't need to be an actual officer to belong to this?

According to what you posted, you can also be:
A concerned business representative.
A citizen.
A city official (ie clerk at the county office).
A crime prevention specialist (they have online schools for this).



You do realize impersonating a Federal Officer is a HUGE CRIME???

Even if she's just a university cop, this would be a Federal Offense for her to do this.

Are you suggesting this? If you are a cop, you should do your job and go arrest her.


1. I'm suggesting the possibility she may be an actor in a propaganda film.
2. I'm not any type of law enforcement official. I own a construction company in Michigan. I can provide the name which you can look up on he Michigan.gov website if you like.
3. I don't know that I can perform a citizens arrest even if it were a crime.
4. I live in Michigan and this happened in Austin, Texas...to far to go to perform a citizens arrest



[edit on 13-6-2010 by jfj123]

[edit on 13-6-2010 by jfj123]



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 09:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by K J Gunderson

reply to post by jfj123
 


Would you mind terribly if I ask why you seem to be going out of your way to ignore the evidence proving the female as a US Marshal?


It looks like she may be a campus cop but I haven't seen where she is actually a US Marshal. Maybe I missed it. If I did, could you repost it ? thanks.

Well this was only posted 3,4, or 5 times


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/00d4b2984c83.jpg[/atsimg]




Do not think I am starting an argument here. I am still a bit open about this but I did not see this explained away and it did seem like you were really trying hard to pretend you did not see it. If I missed something, please show me.

[edit on 13-6-2010 by K J Gunderson]


Yes I saw it. As a matter of fact, I posted that information back on page 5. I'm saying that there are a lot of things that don't add up in this video.
On a side note, I can get a badge that says I'm king of the Universe


[edit on 13-6-2010 by jfj123]



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 09:30 AM
link   
reply to post by jfj123
 


U2 a copy of your contractors license then.



new topics

top topics



 
120
<< 13  14  15    17  18  19 >>

log in

join