It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by secretstoshadow111
I like your interpretation of how you think you can know what i was thinking.
again not promoting anything, I did get an email with no sender with this file attached. I still have an open case with gmail however i guess it takes a couple of days to get a response. I would be willing to send anybody who asks the email that i revived. I would agree though that is easily manufactured evidence. I don't know if the doc has any time stamp on it or some kind of way to show the originator. That might help if you really want to pick at this.
Time stamp on the doc is last modified 3-2-2008 at 10:58 AM Look for your self
Which contains this pearl of wisdom:
Originally posted by Chadwickus
Here's a couple of previous threads regarding this paper:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
I've come to find in the UFO field, if you have to ask "is this true?' then chances are it probably isn't.
The purpose of this post was to find an answer not to argue minor points with people.
Originally posted by secretstoshadow111
time stamp on the doc is last modified 3-2-2008 at 10:58 AM Look for your self ............................................ Let alone 77 or 78 pages that make up the file.
thats interesting simply becvause my copy [ dated 06th DECEMBER 2000 ] is 112 pages wo is re editing it and why ???
I see you have added me as a foe. Nevertheless, I have made my point & I will now have to stand by that in the cold harsh light of the scrutiny of ATS.
Here's a couple of previous threads regarding this paper: www.abovetopsecret.com... www.abovetopsecret.com...
I have seen many people be torn to shreds here on ATS
www.abovetopsecret.com...
The information you received in such a "strange" manner is readily & easily available on line.
I think you might have made this story up, in order to produce a sense of mystery & intrigue around your thread.
I venture to suggest you have commented enough to know that manufacturing a sense of mystery & intrigue around your thread could help to get attention, give the thread momentum & gain you more stars & flags.
I expect that from every body here.
I don't like being attacked
though like i was perpetrating something.
I made no statements saying that i was trying to prove something.
Just gave it to you guys, to get a little info back.
Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not reply to post by secretstoshadow111The information you received in such a "strange" manner is readily & easily available on line. I think you might have made this story up, in order to produce a sense of mystery & intrigue around your thread. I venture to suggest you have commented enough to know that manufacturing a sense of mystery & intrigue around your thread could help to get attention, give the thread momentum & gain you more stars & flags. You have enough experience with ATS to know you will have people respond in your thread who “agree” with you & people who respond in your thread who “disagree” with you. You were not ”being attacked”. I politely raised some points with you pertaining to a very key element of your opening post.
Why do you have to come across so rude and as if you know everything?
If you looked at the OPs profile they don't post much.
Maybe they did think it was interesting.
After seeing another link in the thread I realized I have read this document before and it's a lot to take in.
They just wanted to share it.