World Depopulation Plan On Fox News!!!

Why is it like people suchas Rick on the video above do they have to follow an invisible system with invisible made up statistics and believe from brainwashed, fear mongering tactics that THEIR country is in danger of increased population figures. Since when is it HIS country. Nobody owns the country is free for all. Its this stupid invisible system that they wrongly follow and do it in most money profiteering purposes suchas the likes from manmade disease/wars/disaster's so that people like RICK can have control and take all our rights away from US!

reply to post by jfj123


yupper
after the scam of the HINI last winter has been exposed
here are some infos


Corrupt Scientist who lied about vaccines and autism vanishes with millions, by F William Engdahl
www.theflucase.com... ons-by-f-william-engdahl&catid=1%3Alatest-news&Itemid=64&lang=en

www.autismtodayonline.com...
contains vid of bill gates saying vaccins are to REDUCE population

www.whale.to...
Lancaster, PA, Apr. 18 (UPI) -- Part 1 of 2.

"Where are the autistic Amish? Here in Lancaster County, heart of Pennsylvania Dutch country, there should be well over 100 with some form of the disorder.

I have come here to find them, but so far my mission has failed, and the very few I have identified raise some very interesting questions about some widely held views on autism.

The mainstream scientific consensus says autism is a complex genetic disorder, one that has been around for millennia at roughly the same prevalence. That prevalence is now considered to be 1 in every 166 children born in the United States."

www.infowars.com...

now here is a debunking:
Please note what she is saying is that anoung the AMISH that do vaccinate there IS autism so she is debunking the statement the the AMISH don't vaccinate not that vaccines cause autism
autism.about.com...

more proof:

www.vaclib.org...
Children who receive all of the 22 vaccines and 35 vaccinations currently recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) are 14 times more likely to become learning disabled and 8 times more likely to become autistic compared with children who were never vaccinated!!

This statement was contained in a Letter to the Editor published in the Autism Research Review International (ARRI) Vol. 15, No. 2, 2001 titled "Vaccination Standards." Bernard Rimland, PhD is the editor of ARRI and is a member of Voices of Safety International (VOSI) a not-for-profit standards development organization that writes standards that improve the safety and health of people, and the environment, worldwide. www.voicesofsafety.com ....."About VOSI

here is the scam in general
www.youtube.com...


The Amish Don't Get Autism but They Do Get Bio-Terrorism
People outside the alternative health community are often confused by the lack of autism in the Amish people. The Amish do not experience autism, or any of the other learning disabilities that plague our technological society. The Amish live in a society that consists of outdated technologies and ideals, by contemporary standards. Their diet consists of eating organic, fresh, locally-grown produce, and of course, they do not follow the established vaccination routines. To the dismay of the mainstream media and the medical establishment, this has resulted in a healthier people, that are void of all of our chronic diseases. Heart disease, cancer, and diabetes are virtually non-existent in Amish villages. Equally non-existent are modern, chemically-engineered medicines, enhanced (chemically-engineered) foods, G.M.O. foods, and of course, vaccines. How is it that those who are without the "miracles" of modern orthodox medicine are healthier? The truth about health, medicine, and how they both relate to the Amish is becoming an embarrassment to some rather powerful people.



healthwyze.org...

reply to post by HistoryIsOnlyHisStory
What a ridiculous moron this fool is. The ENTIRE population of the globe could stand shoulder to shoulder and fit within Jacksonville County Florida.

If it's "crowded" where you live then..

MOVE.

Originally posted by Mr Poopra
We seem to have quite a few members here living in la-la land. Have you ever been to an inner city? Guess what, i own several apartment complexes in South FL and i have tenants that have 14+ kids with 8 different women and provide nothing for any of them. I know many grandfathers in their mid 30s. One guy's immediate family (brothers, sisters, parents, children, grandchildren) number close to 100 people. Just his immediate family. These are not unique, isolated cases.

2 Immigrants with a birthrate of 4 will produce 100+ descendants in 80 years.

The liberal mind does not want to see the elephant in the room. Your post confirms my calculations. The only thing that can save the USA is Population Control. It is too late for anything else. Without it the USA will become a poverty stricken third world country with 600+ million poeple in a few years. It happened to India and China.

[edit on 12-6-2010 by RRokkyy]

I believe that our current exponential growth rates are unsustainable unless we do one of two things, or perhaps both. 1. Continue to innovate like we always have. 2. Population control. I choose the former. Besides, if you correlate population growth with living standards you would see that population growth goes down with increasing living standards. Hence it is my belief that we must increase living standards as fast as possible so that less people live in poverty, less people are born into poverty, and be more sustainable. How do you increase living standards? What runs transportation, hospitals, schools, lights, factories... your computer? Energy.

Look at countries with no energy per capita.

Their living standards are terrible.

Their population growth rate is HUGE.

Humans are not deer. Countries with the most resources actually have relatively stable populations. Would you rather live in Afghanistan, or Australia?

If you have people jumping over the border into a country that may not have the infrastructure to sustain high living standards with an expanding population, like the US, then they should close up the border.

We have more disease (cancer, diabetes) then we have ever had, and you have to ask what caused it.

No, you're way off base there.




Many risk factors with cancer are well known.

Other times it happens for no reason at all.

We stabilized lung cancer by discouraging smoking through various means and also air pollution control.

You're making it sound as if diseases are worse than they have ever been which seems hard to believe because cancer mortality rates are going down rather than up.

[edit on 12/6/2010 by C0bzz]

reply to post by C0bzz


Cancer cases 'to increase a third by 2020'
www.timesonline.co.uk...

"nearly 300,000 people having the disease diagnosed each year, according to a landmark government report published yesterday.

The five-year Cancer Reform Strategy said the ageing population, obesity epidemic and rise in lifestyle cancers would cause the rise in the number of people having cancer diagnosed each year.

Over half of all cancers could be prevented if people adopted healthy lifestyles such as stopping smoking, avoiding obesity, eating a healthy diet, undertaking a moderate level of physical activity, avoiding an excessive alcohol intake and avoiding excessive exposure to the sun.

The new strategy includes plans to speed up drug approval, more money for radiotherapy services and a possible clampdown on sunbeds and cigarette vending machines."

reply to post by Danbones


Apologies. The amount of cancer in total is going up but cancer DEATHS per unit of population is going down.

From the actual report you linked.

Cancer mortality in people under 75 fell by
over 17% between 1996 and 2005. This
equates to approximately 60,000 lives saved
over this period;

The incidence of cancer continues to rise due
to the ageing population and is predicted to
increase by around a third between 2001
and 2020 (see Figure 6);

The link between obesity and cancer is now
much clearer than it was seven years ago
and the substantial rise in levels of obesity
will further

Cancer Research UK has developed ten goals to measure success over the coming years in beating cancer. Cancer Research UK will work with partners to achieve the following by 2020:

3. People under 75 will be less likely to get cancer – The chances of a person developing cancer up to the age of 75 will fall from more than one in four to one in five;


www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk...

planet. She can only take so much. This is why I solemnly believe that there is an event that basically resets the world every 3600 years just too put us in check. It shows it in time wave zero as well.

If you believe in time wave zero then perhaps you are an undesirable. It is truly retarded. (This is a joke if you cannot tell).

[edit on 12/6/2010 by C0bzz]

[edit on 12/6/2010 by C0bzz]

Gonna share a story, for any who care:

I am a business manager. I have supervised several thousand people in the course of my career, most of them here in West Texas. I know just about everybody in this county.

I cannot tell you how many times i have heard people talk about having kids, or taking someones kids in, or fostering kids...just getting kids in their houses in general. Why? More kids = more government cheddar. Plain and simple.

I have even heard women encouraging their under age daughters to get started having kids, too. Why? To add to the household income.

If i didn't know better, it would seem that politicians are boosting their constituency. This obviously is becoming an industry: create more poor kids with poor parenting, and then let the government support them.

The real kicker to me? Even though these young mothers are on Medicaid while pregnant, there are procedures that are restricted. For example, one mom i knew had 6 kids by the time she was 20. Catholic background, hispanic...her male partners were not going to use condoms. Her family would not let her use the pill. She asked the doctor to tie her tubes. Know what she was told? "Medicaid doesn't cover that procedure until you are 21 years old."

I am sure that each of you can see what is happening here. This is typical of our leaders. Full of self interest, at the cost of the greatest nation to ever exist.

This is not meant to discuss abortion, other than to point out that abortions are often used as a choice by people who are either educated, affluent, or becoming educated. It is not something used by the poorest people, as there is no way to pay for it, and having kids means more money.

Our policies are geared, intentionally or not, towards creating a poor, uneducated nation. Want evidence? Look how much we have increased spending in schools, and how little effect it has had (with performance dropping like a sack of potatoes).

Of course, with schools being supported by property taxes, there isn't much to tax in a place like Detroit. Eventually, the system will fail.

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by HistoryIsOnlyHisStory

 

What a ridiculous moron this fool is. The ENTIRE population of the globe could stand shoulder to shoulder and fit within Jacksonville County Florida.

If it's "crowded" where you live then..

MOVE.

If he is a fool, enlighten us all with your genius mind. Personal attacks need to be reduced. No need to call names here and act like a what you said.

reply to post by GypsK


I agree with you, if someone who is in their 80's who has lost their partner, and their children have sent them off to some nursing home and never visits them, I can imagine how lonley it can be. (Trust me I worked at one as a CNA for a few months. This poor old man was miserable. He sat everyday by the phone waiting for his children, who are in their 60's with their own grandchildren, to call. They never did. He had Alzhimers but it wasnt too bad. Although he would fade in and out of conversation jumping from topic to topic. He had pictures of him and his wife all over his little room and cried alot. ) I think in a situation like that if someone is done with life, the government should set up some kind of law to help them go peacefully. They do it to animals...

Abortions- as contriversal as it is, I am pro choice. It is a womans choice to choose what she wants. Therefor they should just leave this area alone and let the laws be. It kills me how some republicans are against abortions but then they want to gripe over the welfare system. They cant have their cake and eat it too.

Limited number of children- I totally AGREE!! 3 children should be the magic number. And If the children are in their late teens early 20's in college and moved out then If the couple want a 4th one as their last baby. I think that should be allowed as well. But let me tell you something about my generation, All of my friends all have 1 kid. The kids age in a range between newborn to 5 years old. All of my friends say that they are completely content with one child. I have one child and I do not plan on having another baby for a long long LONG time. The fact of the matter is children now a days are so expensive to have. 600$ a month in daycare for children under the age of two. a package of 30 diapers is 20$ My baby use to go threw 30 diapers in 4/5 days (using 4-6 diapers a day)160$ a month for diapers, Formula is outrageous 13$ for a 24 oz can that last 3 days! Thats not including the 9$ pair of shoes the baby grows out of in less then 6 weeks, thats not including clothes, toys, blankets, its really just to expensive to have more then one child. I only know of 3 people who have more then one kid, 2 are my cousins, one has 5 kids, the other cousin has 4 kids. (They were 90's teen) I do have a friend of a friend who has 3 kids at the age of 24.. but they live a good life and can afford it. But for my generation, most moms that I know of (about 9)say that even if they WANTED another child they couldnt afford one. So I dont know hopefully this is a new begining for awareness on unplanned pregnancies. All of my friends and I joke that the best birth control is having one child, after that one child you will never forget to take your pill again!! LOL

But you have good valid points and I agree with u!

Originally posted by KILLFOXX
Food? Once again. There is absolutly no reason in this time and age with the technologies we have that ANYBODY on planet earth should have to go without food or water for that matter!! PERIOD!!

This overpopulation BS is nothing more then the men behind the curtains wanting the number of people cut for easier control and managability.

This is correct, one man has taken basic hydroponics on 3 acres
and grows 1 million pounds of fish and veggies in one year.

www.youtube.com...

This could be replicated world wide and no one need starve.

As for the fresh water issue they just need wells and windmills.

Old dempster windmills used to dot the prairie here in the US.

www.agwt.org...

All the problems of the world could be solved by a merged
approach of the Co-op and Technocracy.

All the current forms of government just manipulate the working
class into being slaves for paper and ink that is constantly losing value
because they just print more of it.

Exactly, 94% of this country is rural land. No one lives in it.

Alas, much of that is farmland or wilderness thus if you want to space people out you inevitable reduce both; which has consequences.

The problem is too many people in one area. Huge, congested, miserable cities. If you have too many people in one area of course the water table is going to be stressed.

You have things completely backwards. Cities are actually incredibly good for the environment because without cities we would likely just have severe urban-sprawl which is the real issue as it takes up immense amounts of land that could be used for more productive purposes or stay untouched. If things are spaced out you inevitably drive up transmission costs, transportation costs, and water costs. All of which damage the environment.

Encourage people to move! Stop hoarding all the damn land.

Uhm aren't they polar opposites?

As for energy, take a look at this.
www.ftcampbellfh.com...
This is the new project at the local army base.

Solar is per unit of electricity produced incredibly expensive.

I think EVERY house should be retrofitted with a solar system

Which would be an incredible waste of money and would be counter intuitive.

[edit on 12/6/2010 by C0bzz]

[edit on 12/6/2010 by C0bzz]

[edit on 12/6/2010 by C0bzz]

reply to post by C0bzz

no apology needed
I was adding to what you posted there not refuting
my bad
should have been more concise myself
eugenics is no fun unless they get to suck the money out of a person like a ripe tomato


I'd like to point out as well this is about making money
notice the" stay out of the sun" bit in my article?
when it has been proven huge amounts of Vitamin D from the sun
PREVENT cancer and cure cancer calciom is overpresent mostly:

"UCSD School of Medicine and Moores Cancer Center used a complex computer prediction model to determine that intake of vitamin D3 and calcium would prevent 58,000 new cases of breast cancer and 49,000 new cases of colorectal cancer annually in the US and Canada. The researchers' model also predicted that 75% of deaths from these cancers could be prevented with adequate intake of vitamin D3 and calcium. Join Dr. Cedric Garland, lead researcher on the study, as he discusses the implications of these findings and the proposed actions. (#16940)
www.uctv.tv...

in Canada they totally over look what the HUGE Canadian sheild can produce in the way of life sustaining diversity
for instance I get about three quaters of my veggies lately walking throught the green belt walking the dog.
plus herbal medicines and other helpfull things, and I'm not going at it full bore by any means just practicing ya know




[edit on 12-6-2010 by Danbones]

reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan


To you sir!
I have a story to tell, I am 25 years old, I have a 2 year old child. I make 9.50/hr as a medical records clerk. I struggle EVERYDAY! I can barely afford food. I applied for foodstamps and I got declined because I make to much money!! My rent is 700$ a month my daycare is 500$ a month, my lights are close to 200$ a month my student loans are 100$ a month my babies diapers are 120$ a month my car insurance is 140$ a month and gas alone is close 80$ a month just to get me back and forth to work because Im so broke I cant go anywhere else... and I am a white female, being a female alone makes me a minority and I GOT DECLINED FOR FOODSTAMPS. I've pawned all of my jewlery through out the years for food, My mother has had to help with food, but I make too much money. So can you please explain how having a child gives you government money?? The only thing my baby has is medicaid and THANK GOD for that because I cant afford healthcare for myself! ( My job just canceled their insurance policy a month ago them a-holes) My childs father got laid off almost a year ago and has had a hard time finding work, but I make to much money! secondly children are only used as deductions for tax purposes. Each dependent is worth 3,650$( The government has some kind of formula that states you only sped about 3,650$ a month on your dependents which is utter bullsh*t, I spend 6,000$ alone on daycare a year.) to be deducted from you AGI. So basically they are deducting the 3,650 off of your income to bring down your tax liablity I make about 20,000 a yr. So my personal exemption along with my daughters deduction is going to knock down my taxable income to 14,000. THATS BS! My fiance and I are not married and legally in florida I can not claim him even though I am taking care of him because we are not married! SO AGAIN please tell me how you get government assistance just for having kids, because Id like to know... unless its because Im white

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by HistoryIsOnlyHisStory

 

What a ridiculous moron this fool is. The ENTIRE population of the globe could stand shoulder to shoulder and fit within Jacksonville County Florida.

If it's "crowded" where you live then..

MOVE.

BS I highly doubt your conclusion. I can guarantee you that your conclusion is hogwash. By your "logical" thought you are forgeting over weight people in that equation of yours.

reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan


YES, I know one woman who was that way. She says she loves kids and would have tons of them. I believe if I remember correctly she has 4. She adopted some. She one day finally told me the reason and it was because you get 5000 for each kid that is in the house hold by the IRS or something like that. The last time I saw her I think she divorced her husband because the guy I saw her wasn't her husband.

So this guy didn't really say much about the population control, she was bashing him too much over it. Is he just a shill that is pretending to be for border control, but this is a trick to create mass genocide? This guy should just say he's for Arizona immigration laws. The lady is saying some good stuff, I think she should have made him say something more incriminating. He switched to the immigration issue real fast.

Originally posted by chaosinorder

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by HistoryIsOnlyHisStory

 

What a ridiculous moron this fool is. The ENTIRE population of the globe could stand shoulder to shoulder and fit within Jacksonville County Florida.

If it's "crowded" where you live then..

MOVE.

If he is a fool, enlighten us all with your genius mind. Personal attacks need to be reduced. No need to call names here and act like a what you said.

I Just told you. Take the square miles of Jackson County. Now convert it into square feet.

The ENTIRE world's population can fit within Jackson County, Florida.






Like I also said, if it's crowded where you live... MOVE SOMEWHERE ELSE.

[edit on 12-6-2010 by NOTurTypical]

Originally posted by dragnet53

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by HistoryIsOnlyHisStory

 

What a ridiculous moron this fool is. The ENTIRE population of the globe could stand shoulder to shoulder and fit within Jacksonville County Florida.

If it's "crowded" where you live then..

MOVE.

BS I highly doubt your conclusion. I can guarantee you that your conclusion is hogwash. By your "logical" thought you are forgeting over weight people in that equation of yours.

Do the math, there is more than enough room left over for overweight people.

But for the sake of argument I agree with you, then lets be extremelly conservative.

The ENTIRE population of the world can fit into the STATE of Florida.


Aggggain, if it's crowded where you happen to live,..

MOVE somewhere else.

Don't for a second buy into this BS from the NWO that there needs to be population control, it's ludicrous.

Originally posted by StarrGazer25
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan

 

To you sir!
I have a story to tell, I am 25 years old, I have a 2 year old child. I make 9.50/hr as a medical records clerk. I struggle EVERYDAY! I can barely afford food. I applied for foodstamps and I got declined because I make to much money!! My rent is 700$ a month my daycare is 500$ a month, my lights are close to 200$ a month my student loans are 100$ a month my babies diapers are 120$ a month my car insurance is 140$ a month and gas alone is close 80$ a month just to get me back and forth to work because Im so broke I cant go anywhere else... and I am a white female, being a female alone makes me a minority and I GOT DECLINED FOR FOODSTAMPS. I've pawned all of my jewlery through out the years for food, My mother has had to help with food, but I make too much money. So can you please explain how having a child gives you government money?? The only thing my baby has is medicaid and THANK GOD for that because I cant afford healthcare for myself! ( My job just canceled their insurance policy a month ago them a-holes) My childs father got laid off almost a year ago and has had a hard time finding work, but I make to much money! secondly children are only used as deductions for tax purposes. Each dependent is worth 3,650$( The government has some kind of formula that states you only sped about 3,650$ a month on your dependents which is utter bullsh*t, I spend 6,000$ alone on daycare a year.) to be deducted from you AGI. So basically they are deducting the 3,650 off of your income to bring down your tax liablity I make about 20,000 a yr. So my personal exemption along with my daughters deduction is going to knock down my taxable income to 14,000. THATS BS! My fiance and I are not married and legally in florida I can not claim him even though I am taking care of him because we are not married! SO AGAIN please tell me how you get government assistance just for having kids, because Id like to know... unless its because Im white

You have just 1 child? Of course you make too much money. Have 3-4 more, and then just quit your job. You will get free housing, free medical for all the kids (and maybe you, if you can make a case about you being important to their well being), you will get foodstamps.....

Having 1 child does nothing for you. You, my dear, are a responsible person and i have the utmost respect for people like yourself. My mom was a single woman that worked her butt off to take care of me without using the hand of a stranger for assistance.

I know your life is hard, and i cannot do anything to help you. But i can make sure you know that i admire you. Take care of your child. Life will eventually improve, and if you do that child right, they will take care of you when you are old.

God bless