It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A lot of Arizonans are upset about illegal immigration, and to learn why, you can't do better than the letter from Arizona State Sen. Sylvia Allen. Widely circulated on the Internet, it provides a pungent statement of the frustrations behind the new law stiffening enforcement—while confirming that it's the wrong remedy.
People on the border, she writes, "have pleaded for help to stop the daily invasion of humans who cross their property." The migrants damage fences, scatter trash, and sometimes perish en route. "One rancher testified that 300 to 1,200 people a DAY come across his ranch," reports Allen.
The illegal entries, she believes, undermine our status as "a nation of laws." With a state budget deficit, "we do not have the money to care for any who are not here legally," she says.
Hers are not the only complaints being heard. Among others: Illegals don't pay taxes. They steal Social Security numbers to get jobs. They drive down wages by working off the books.
All no doubt true. But the legislation assumes that tougher enforcement at the border and within the state will magically banish these problems. In fact, those options have already been tried, and all they have done is make things worse.
The supporters of the law, meanwhile, overlook the obvious. There is a simple way to stop the lawless stream, protect Americans living on the border, improve adherence to law, and reduce the costs of accommodating people who have no right to be here.
The solution? Stop focusing on trying to keep illegal immigrants out and start focusing on letting legal immigrants in.
Originally posted by ChrisF231
We already allow too much legal immigration. There is no need for it anymore, let the Americans have America. This is OUR homeland.
Reduce legal immigration to 100,000 per year, minimum of an associates degree required to even be considered. Only allow those immigrants who can benefit the nation rather then drain the nation.
Originally posted by vor78
I would vote to deport her. If she had done the right thing in the first place and were attempting to gain legal citizenship beforehand, I'd be much more sympathetic, but there's no mention of that.
Originally posted by kozmo
Um, I'm sorry that I even have to point his out, but the United States HAS LEGAL IMMIGRATION.
No, the answer is to RESTRICT legal immigration and DECREASE the number of guest-woker visas until such time that our economy recovers and our borders are FULLY secured.
Originally posted by octotom
I think a case that you bring up is an exception, a special case. For someone like her, an avenue for citizenship should be provided.
That said, I think that illegal immigration needs to be dealt with. We can't just allow people to come in whenever they feel like it.
Originally posted by yoesse
reply to post by traditionaldrummer
Nip it in the bud. Nip it. Nip it now.
Originally posted by Eagleheart56
So the answer is to award illegal behavior
Originally posted by lpowell0627
That being said, I would again emphasize that breaking our current laws and coming to this country illegally does not become a justified offense. Why? Because there is no such thing. Laws are laws and just as we citizens must follow them, whether we agree or disagree with them, so must everyone else.
Originally posted by ChrisF231
We already allow too much legal immigration. There is no need for it anymore, let the Americans have America. This is OUR homeland.