It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LieBuster
reply to post by mhc_70
This blockade is nothing more than a defensive measure preventing weapons from entering Gaza, Nothing more nothing less, regardless of how you spin it.
They are blocking cement needed to rebuild and they are blocking paper needed for education and thats just scraching the surface.
Seems to me that it is you that is guilty of spinning it and why defend the legal system when Iserail has broken more UN resolutions than any other nation on earth even with america using it veto so many times.
Europes love afair with america is fast ending and it's well past time the zionist grip was broken not that i'm saying we don't have the same problom to some extent ourselves.
Aid agencies operating in Gaza say they have largely been able to continue to transport basic supplies such as flour and cooking oil into the territory. But the UN's Food and Agriculture Organisation says 61% of Gazans are "food insecure". According to the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, Unrwa, 80% of Gazan households rely on some kind of food aid. Unrwa provides food aid for 750,000 people, half the population. Its food distribution has been suspended several times since June 2007 as a result of border closures or fuel shortages. Israel usually says crossings are closed for security reasons, pointing to occasions when Palestinian militants have attacked the crossings or fired barrages of rockets into Israel. Unrwa rations provide about two-thirds of dietary needs, and so need to be supplemented by dairy products, meat, fish and fresh fruit and vegetables. Some of these items are grown locally, some allowed in from Israel, and some smuggled in through tunnels under the Egypt-Gaza border. But with the Palestinian Bureau of Statistics estimating unemployment at 38.6% in early 2010, some Gazans cannot afford the basics, even if they are physically available. Unrwa says the number of Gazan that it helps who are unable to buy basic items such as soap, stationary and safe drinking water has tripled since 2007.
Casus belli is a Latin expression meaning the justification for acts of war. Casus means "incident", "rupture" or indeed "case", while belli means "of war". It is usually distinguished from casus foederis, with casus belli being used to refer to offenses or threats directly against a nation, and casus foederis to refer to offenses or threats to another, allied, nation with which the justifying nation is engaged in a mutual defense treaty, such as NATO.[1][2]
It is sometimes misspelled and mispronounced as "causus belli" since this resembles the English "cause" (and a different Latin word, causa [cause]).[citation needed] "Casus belli" is sometimes pronounced this way because the term is used with the meaning of "cause for war", instead of "case of war" (notice that "case" comes from Latin "casus"). The OED, however, gives the pronunciation above.
National armies will be mobilised for war against Israel. You may even be asked to have some part in this invasion. The turmoil in the Middle East and the rapid emergence of Israel are signs that this invasion will take place in the foreseeable future. Within just 100 years Israel has gone from insignificance to the vortex of the world. The significant point is that when the invasion starts Jesus will return to earth. In fact, there is strong biblical support for the view that Christians (believers in Christ) will be taken from the earth just prior to this invasion (see The Last Years of this Age).
Israel rejects multinational inquiry into flotilla attack UN-proposed commission into flotilla raid is dismissed as global pressure grows for Israel to ease its blockade of Gaza
Israel's prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, today dismissed a UN proposal for an international commission to investigate last week's assault on a flotilla of aid ships. Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary general, proposed a commission of inquiry headed by the former New Zealand prime minister Geoffrey Palmer, who is an expert in maritime law. The commission would include representatives of Israel, the US and Turkey. All nine activists killed in the operation were Turkish; one held joint US citizenship. Ban discussed the plan with Netanyahu, who later briefed party colleagues on the call, saying: "We need to consider the issue carefully and level-headedly while monitoring Israel's national interests."
Originally posted by bootsnspurs33
i've said it before and i"ll say it again,YEA ISRAEL - the stupid terrorist shouldn't have brought knives to a gunfight!! The blockade is a standard military opperation to stop the flow of arms & terrorist from entering gaza.The Jew haters prove that that's what this is all about by trying to act like this is anything else but a justified military action on Israel's part.
Originally posted by oozyism
I only have to say one thing, the blockade is illegal therefore any ship can enter Gaza if they wish.
Sorry to inform you but no....Israel is well within it's rights to enforce a blockade and search all vehicles and vessels wishing to enter Gaza. Countries get to do that sort of thing, there are numerous examples of it. The documents supporting this have be posted in this thread. You are right that any ship or vehicle or ship or plane can TRY to enter Gaza, but they will be running a blockade and will be treated as such.
What exactly makes it illegal in your eyes???
Originally posted by oozyism
Get real.. There is a reason why rockets are being fired towards Israel..
I had hoped for a better argument. You make my point for me...rockets fired towards Israel from Gaza, yet you wonder why Israel wants to blockade Gaza and search every vehicle for weapons. I don't claim the Israeli's to be angels yet you are willing to give Hamas a free pass to attack whenever and whoever without concern.
And we wonder why both sides can't seem to find peace.
Originally posted by oozyism
Ohhh Jeez, when did the suicide bombing and fireworks start? Think about the intifada?
Ohh ofcurse, you are a Zionist Christian I suspect
What happened to the occupation and Jewish settlement expansion?
Have you ever read history? Do you know why Palestinians became violent after decades of peaceful protest?
Both the Settlement expansions and the Occupation continues, both illegal under international law.
I assure you I am not a "Zionist Christian", but believe what you want. I don't think settlements on the West Bank nor Gaza are productive towards a lasting peace. Israel has done many lunkheaded things....so have the Palestinians. I honestly don't think that either side thinks they started this mess. It's kinda a moot point given how much blood has been spilled. Both sides would rather take revenge upon revenge upon revenge on the other. The "eye for an eye" has quite literally left them both blind to the other.
I also think it's quite disingenuous of you to claim the Palestinians to have tried "decades" of peaceful protest. On could very well claim that the Second Intifada was quite possibly the biggest error that Arafat ever made. That blunder has caused the delay in a Palestinian State edging on 2 long decades of suffering when the prize was well within his grasp. History will look back at that time as a squandered chance. All Arafat had to do was stay engaged and counteroffer, instead he chose this................
Expanding Jewish settlements is not protecting its citizens, continuing the occupation is not protecting its citizens.
Palestinians have peacefully protested these actions for a long time until the 2nd intifada when they just lost it and the extreme faction of the Palestinian people were given the thumbs up to fight and defend the Palestinians.
After all that was the reason for choosing Hamas.
How can we solve the issue?
The issue can be solved when there is balance, when Israel's security is truly at risk, home made fireworks being thrown towards Israel is not a security risk, car crashes kill more people in Israel than those home made fireworks.
That being said, once Israel truly sees security risk arising in regards to its continuous settlement expansions, and continuous occupations, that is when it will come to the table and start negotiating for a peace plan.
stirred an outburst of anger amongst Palestinians, exasperated by the stagnation of the peace process, as well as by the continuing occupation and settlement expansion.
The violent repression of Palestinian demonstrations demanding the immediate ending of the occupation killed more than 200 Palestinians in one month, of which one third was under 17 years old. To respond to this brutality, the Intifada became militarised as from the beginning of November 2000.
Among the many reasons for the start of the second Palestinian intifada in September 2000, the massive expansion of Jewish settlements in the West Bank and Gaza must count as the most important.
When Yasser Arafat and Yitzak Rabin shook hands on the White House lawn in September 1993 there were about 115,000 Jewish settlers in West Bank and Gaza. By the time of the second intifada seven years later there were more than 200,000 of them. Reports suggest another 1,500 families (17,000 people) have been added to this total during 2001, more than the 400 settler families that have moved back to Israel under the impact of the intifada.
Gaza, one of the most densely populated tracts of land in the world, is home to 1,178,000 Palestinians, 33 per cent of whom live in United Nations-funded refugee camps.
Gaza is also home to 6,900 Jewish settlers. Yet the Israeli-controlled areas and settlements take up about 40 per cent of Gaza's land. Israel controls all external borders, crossing points and major roads in Gaza.
I don't condone everything Israel does or has done, yet you seem to think that whatever the Palestinians do or have done is acceptable behavior.
I know, I'm just a Zionist Christian.................
Originally posted by oozyism
I know you are not trying to take sides, but sometimes you have to, I bet you would take sides of the Allies when it comes to Hitler.
Due to the above quotation I'm thinking that you are thinking, the settlement expansion, nor the occupation was and is the problem which forced Palestinians to take arms. Am I making a correct assumption here? If so, you are naive to believe that, read history, Palestinians did try to protest these actions peacefully, but they were shot at and killed when they did, so what other options did they have available?
And Seriously, GAZA:
Gaza, one of the most densely populated tracts of land in the world, is home to 1,178,000 Palestinians, 33 per cent of whom live in United Nations-funded refugee camps.
Gaza is also home to 6,900 Jewish settlers. Yet the Israeli-controlled areas and settlements take up about 40 per cent of Gaza's land. Israel controls all external borders, crossing points and major roads in Gaza.
www.permanentrevolution.net...
No justice no peace, don't forget that.