It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
From spaceandmotion.com:
The rules of wave combination are of great importance to science because the rules and quantum spin determine the structure of the Atomic Table, which dictates the varied forms of matter: metals, crystals, semi-conductors, and the molecules of life. The deep understanding of basic physics that is revealed opens a door to broad fields of applied technology such as integrated circuits, photonics, and commercial energy. It reveals a universe of real quantum wave structures in a space medium that we live in but seldom are aware of. The medium is the heart of wave structure because its properties underlie the wave properties.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
From spaceandmotion.com:
The Error - The Motion of Discrete Particles in Space and Time
For the past 350 years (since Newton) we have tried to describe an interconnected reality (which has been known for thousands of years) with many discrete and separate 'particles'. Thus you have to add forces or fields to the particles to connect them together in space and time. This is merely a mathematical solution and it does not explain how discrete matter particles create continuous fields that act on other particles in the space around them. Further, both quantum physics (particle-wave duality, non-locality, uncertainty) and Einstein's general relativity (matter-energy curves space-time) contradict the concept of discrete and separate 'particles'.
The Solution - The Wave Motion of Space Causes Matter and Time
We simply needed to describe reality from the most simple foundation of the one thing, Space, that all matter exists in (look around you now and think about this - we all experience existing in space).
This leads to only one solution, a Wave Structure of Matter in Space from which we then deduce the fundamentals of physics, philosophy and metaphysics to show that it is correct (and scientific / testable, not just our opinion).
I didn't say anything about myself (other than "I don't understand why you're doing it").
Originally posted by Mary Rose
reply to post by Bobathon
You have an exaggerated opinion of yourself.
Then Einstein's familiar time-dilation formula is found by taking the Lorentz transform of the outwave velocity
First we assume standing matter waves which start with fundamental wavelength R equal to the Compton wavelength of the electron
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by Mary Rose
From spaceandmotion.com:
From the The Dynamic Unity of Reality page, the error, and the solution:
The Error - The Motion of Discrete Particles in Space and Time
For the past 350 years (since Newton) we have tried to describe an interconnected reality (which has been known for thousands of years) with many discrete and separate 'particles'. Thus you have to add forces or fields to the particles to connect them together in space and time. This is merely a mathematical solution and it does not explain how discrete matter particles create continuous fields that act on other particles in the space around them. Further, both quantum physics (particle-wave duality, non-locality, uncertainty) and Einstein's general relativity (matter-energy curves space-time) contradict the concept of discrete and separate 'particles'.
The Solution - The Wave Motion of Space Causes Matter and Time
We simply needed to describe reality from the most simple foundation of the one thing, Space, that all matter exists in (look around you now and think about this - we all experience existing in space).
This leads to only one solution, a Wave Structure of Matter in Space from which we then deduce the fundamentals of physics, philosophy and metaphysics to show that it is correct (and scientific / testable, not just our opinion).
Resorting to fallacies doesn't refute a well constructed and articulated theory of how the universe works - knowledge we can use for better, life-affirming, technology.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
reply to post by Bobathon
You have an exaggerated opinion of yourself.
What thoughts, exactly?
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Some food for thought
I can't believe I watched the whole thing. I didn't know whether to laugh or cry, or just shake my head in amazement at how deep in the woo these guys are. I would tend to associate the vast majority of this material with the output end of a digestive system, rather than the input end, as it's more worthy of flushing than consuming.
Originally posted by Bobathon
What thoughts, exactly?
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Some food for thought
He's in good company in woo land with Greg Braden and Bruce Lipton, a couple of guys who either don't know much about real quantum mechanics and show their ignorance, or if they really do know it, they intentionally misrepresent it.
Haramein has every right to entertain such people, so long as we can be honest about it...
Well that pretty much resolves the discrepancy between mainstream physics and guys like Haramein, Braden and Lipton, doesn't it?
...the universe is not an assembly of physical parts as suggested by Newtonian physics but is derived from a holistic entanglement of immaterial energy waves. Quantum mechanics shockingly reveals that there is no true “physicality” in the universe; atoms are made of focused vortices of energy-miniature tornados that are constantly popping into and out of existence....
A fundamental conclusion of the new physics also acknowledges that the “observer creates the reality. “As observers, we are personally involved with the creation of our own reality! Physicists are being forced to admit that the universe is a “mental” construction.
I've read part of Mandelbrot's fractal book and there's some valid mathematics in it. But people like Dr' Lipton have distorted fractals the same way they've distorted quantum mechanics: He should have stuck to biology, and even in that field I don't believe his claim that each one of my cells are sentient, at least not according to my definition of sentience.
Taylor & al. replied to Jones-Smith and Mathur's article in Nature, displaying an interesting collection of unscientific arguments. They say:"Our use of the term 'fractal' is consistent with that by the research community. In dismissing Pollock's fractals, because of their limited magnification range, Jones-Smith and Mathur would also dismiss half the published investigations of physical fractals."
First unscientific argument, the argument from authority. Indeed I have no problem believing that half of the papers published on "physical fractals" (whatever it means) are crap.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
reply to post by Arbitrageur
Wow. You LOVE to ridicule.
You are something else. Phew!!!!
Originally posted by buddhasystem
I do think that meditation is useful and important . . .
Does it provide information to a scientist he/she does not get in the lab, reading, talking to others, or any other input?
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by buddhasystem
I do think that meditation is useful and important . . .
Does it provide information to a scientist he/she does not get in the lab, reading, talking to others, or any other input?
I never did get an answer to this question, did I?
Originally posted by buddhasystem
You cannot extract data out of your meditation session.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by buddhasystem
You cannot extract data out of your meditation session.
You make it sound as if data is the only type of info there is.
Maybe that's true for you, however.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
You want to learn? Go to school.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by buddhasystem
You want to learn? Go to school.
Going to school gives people other people's perceptions.
Meditation is for listening to the universe.