It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
You posit that the reading even might have been scheduled for an hour, but just before that you claim that the 9.30 press announcement had been scheduled. How can both be true?
Why if it is stage managed would they allow it to look like he was stalling?
What would you think if Bush had immediately left? Would it not seem suspicious, as though he already knew the extent of what was going to happen?
Originally posted by ATH911
Perps behind "stunningly complex" conspiracies don't make mistakes?
No, it's what I would expect any innocent Commander in Chief to do, go see what's going on and if they need to give out any orders ASAP to, ya know, save lives.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
You're saying that they wanted the world to watch as Bush was informed of the strike
which he knew about in advance, and they didn't even bother to make him look statesmanlike, or even shocked. Why would they do that?
TAnd they can't even make the President look convincing? Even though they are putting him on TV on purpose, presumably with the intent of him looking convincing?
I wouldn't have been surprised if he'd left. But it would suggest he knew more about the conspiracy, not less, if he had. He didn't, according to the OS, know about the other flights yet, so why would he be out there making decisions about shooting them down? He would have needed incredible foresight to do that. Indeed, the kind of foresight that comes with inside knowledge...
Originally posted by ATH911
No, I never speculated they wanted the world to watch Bush being informed of the attacks per se, but to be in front of cameras so there would be no question of where he was and what he was doing when the second hit happened.
First, just because I think he was in on it, I never suggested how much he knew of the details. Second, they can't make Bush act perfectly they way they wanted. Bush's acting skills would only be as good as they are. It's not like he had a chance for a retake.
So you agree he didn't look convincing?!
Did Andrew Card say "America's under attack" or "We just got attacked, but it's all over now"?
Originally posted by ATH911
Since there is not a precise time for when Bush left the room, let's say, for the sake of argument, that the reading event was scheduled from 9am to 10am, a full hour.
Bush was told America's under attack at about 9:07 am.
My question for you skeptics is, with this hypothetical scenario, about how long would Bush have had to stayed reading in that room until you think he was purposely stalling (as in he was in on it and that's why he was stalling)?
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
You obviously didn't read my posts properly. I answered it some time ago. I then asked a question which you didn't answer, ironically.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
reply to post by ATH911
Okay.
About 25 minutes.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
What would you think if Bush had immediately left? Would it not seem suspicious, as though he already knew the extent of what was going to happen? For example, if he immediately started discussing shoot down options, wouldn't that be odd, given that he had no way of knowing other planes are in the air? Wouldn't you perhaps suggest that this might be evidence that he understood the extent of the plot a little TOO well?
Originally posted by ATH911
reply to post by TrickoftheShade
Because it was obvious you gave me a BS answer when you said you would think Bush's action would make you suspicious if he stayed reading for "26 min." I'm surprised you didn't add seconds on the end to make it more obvious you gave a BS answer.
How is it a ridiculous hypothetical question? Because you're afraid it will cast suspicion on Bush's non-action?
How would we even know if he immediately started discussing shoot down options?
If he was overheard discussing shoot down options before he got out of the classroom, then yes.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
It's ridiculous because you're asking how suspicious it would be if he did something that he didn't do.
When in fact an immediate leap into action would be far more suspicious.
And even if he did delay for longer that would hardly be cast-iron proof of any kind of involvement in conspiracy.
So it would appear more suspicious if he seemed prepared?
Originally posted by ATH911
Still would like an answer from all the skeptics on this one.
Pretty telling why most all have avoided giving an answer.