Oddly shaped UFO sighting

Originally posted by kinda kurious
Also, just kurious. If you suspect OP is a "Hoaxer" (btw, I do not) what would prevent a person of questionable integrity from simply taking a picture of ANY windshield? I don't get it?




[edit on 24-5-2010 by kinda kurious]

My point exactly and pointed that out about 6 pages ago hence why they're going after the fence now.

I'll repeat - the "shadow" has not been added to the photo. Zoom in close enough and this is obvious (unless the OP has painstakingly inserted dozens of individual pixels of differing shades!).

Forget the "shadow" - maybe it's part of the fence, maybe it's a log, maybe it's a pond... whatever it is, it's not the result of manipulation.

reply to post by One Moment


No, I have not ruled 100% hoaxer. I am trying to get all of the info and rule out fact from fiction. I can admit to being wrong, but the info is scattered where I was here, no I was there.

I was never on board with the windshield crack as to he said he shot it out the side window.

How many hoaxes have we seen on ATS. How many pics like this turn out to be fake, and some joke by the poster.

I would love to be able at the end of all of this say, yeah you know what, all the questions have been answered and the only conclusion is it is unidentified, its flying, and its an object.

Tell then, I will not blindly look at something for 1 min and rule "thats got to be real" whats the point.

reply to post by One Moment


Well duh!

I'm trying to get to the bottom of it that's all. If I wasn't at least partially interested I wouldn't be posting replies.



There is still one fundamental question that I can't find an answer too:

How did we get this photo in the first place? As the OP says he can't transfer direct from phone to computer. How have the two photos we have been transferred over. I need to know this. Until I do I won't be able to shutup

And all this time I'm writing music, working on a game, trying to sort my bedclothes out, whilst GE-ing and playing with photos - so yes I'm sorry if I've missed key points or didn't spot the fence but I'm trying to multi-task

[edit on 24-5-2010 by markymint]

Many things have been covered in this story of a "UFO Sighting'. Nothing has added up in any way to prove or completely dis-prove this photo and claim.

However something of this magnitude has to be held to the highest standards. A photo depicting what the OP is perpetrating is a groundbreaking image that has implications in many different aspects of society. What could Stephen Hawking and other great scientists do with a photo of a wormhole??

Everyone has done great things in picking apart the story, but the only thing that can be done is analyze the hard evidence and the hard evidence in this case is the photos.

Knowing this evidence has to be examined with great scrutiny, no further questioning should be performed or responses given until the OP agrees to make available the RAW unedited photos.

If the $ is a problem please U2U me and I will take care of the charges of mailing - through internet - the RAW unedited images to a forum moderator or a qualified expert to examine such important images of a groundshaking image such as this.

I hope you will take my request seriously and forgive me for leaning toward these being manipulated in some way. I hope you will come forward with the RAW images and prove me and many others wrong.

[edit on 24-5-2010 by esteay812]

Originally posted by markymint
reply to post by One Moment

 

Well duh!

I'm trying to get to the bottom of it that's all. If I wasn't at least partially interested I wouldn't be posting replies.

There is still one fundamental question that I can't find an answer too:

How did we get this photo in the first place? As the OP says he can't transfer direct from phone to computer. How have the two photos we have been transferred over. I need to know this. Until I do I won't be able to shutup

And all this time I'm writing music, working on a game, trying to sort my bedclothes out, whilst GE-ing and playing with photos - so yes I'm sorry if I've missed key points or didn't spot the fence but I'm trying to multi-task

[edit on 24-5-2010 by markymint]

I believe it was from Fox:

Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
reply to post by draknoir2

 

Yeah, some of them are close to our image. I'm willing to buy it's a chip, but it doesn't explain the 'vapor trial' or contrail that seems to follow the object perfectly

Sorry, I meant the very very first one that the OP posted in his thread.

If he wasn't able to send it from phone to PC, how did he upload a pic for us to see?

What I speculated earlier was that he got a digital camera and took a photo of a mobile phone screen.

That is the info I'm looking for

But as the person a couple of posts above said, the raw images are needed. So until then, time to sleep. G'night!


Above, more Canadian plains. Maybe give some folk an idea of depth. Try to picture an object 50 metres away in the air. Now try and picture a smaller object right next to the camera. PS. That is not a fence in the photo, it is two black stick like alien creatures

[edit on 24-5-2010 by markymint]

Originally posted by markymint
Sorry, I meant the very very first one that the OP posted in his thread.

If he wasn't able to send it from phone to PC, how did he upload a pic for us to see?

What I speculated earlier was that he got a digital camera and took a photo of a mobile phone screen.

That is the info I'm looking for

But as the person a couple of posts above said, the raw images are needed. So until then, time to sleep. G'night!

[edit on 24-5-2010 by markymint]

I think he mentioned something about a scanner. Too lazy to scroll through all the pages but he did address this question (without even being asked, I think)


Edit to add: Yeah but then, how did he get it on the scanner? Again...I think that was resolved. Now, I'm starting to feel like the OP and everything is getting hazy and unclear. Time for bed I think!

[edit on 24-5-2010 by One Moment]

You've got to ask - what are the chances of capturing a UFO at the very instant it hits a wormhole?

If this photo is real (I have no idea) it could grace the cover of TIME magazine...

BlueFireWolf can you give me the original picture from the camera? Transfer it without any editing. So I can check if it is edited or not. And what is the name of your camera ?


[edit on 24/5/10 by defiler]

reply to post by kinda kurious


Kinda kurious.....

Me ol' mate! How's it going?

Listen.....that's not me.....that's me cuz'.....I borrowed the software from 'im.

As for whether or not I suspect the op is hoaxing.....

Well..... I guess one has to engage with somewhat of that mindset in order to try to figure out all that might have gone on / might still be going on.

Just suppose someone.....by that 1 in 1 million trillion chance.....did manage to get a photo of something. Then suppose we all just said "yah ya mangy hoaxer". I don't want that to happen.

I'll just be the happiest guy around if I can convince myself something like the op's photo is "real".

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

[edit on 24-5-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]

Originally posted by defiler
BlueFireWolf can you give me the original picture from the camera? Transfer it without any editing. So I can check if it is edited or not. And what is the name of your camera ?

Defiler.....

I'll U2U some info.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

[edit on 24-5-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]

reply to post by One Moment


One Moment.....

I had a good look into that one in a previous thread.

It's interesting, but I think on balance it's a hoax......um.....probably!

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

I dont know why anyone bothers posting ufo pics on here, they allways got shot down as fake within the first 3 or 4 replys, if i had a ufo pic id keep it to my self, at least id know the truth

I think this is a fake. I reckon the bluring around the space ship was added to cover up cut lines between the UFO and the background picture. If this thing was real it would have to be either very close or absolutely huge. I just cant buy it Im afraid, the photo just doesnt look right.

ATS Team.....

Here's an enlargement of the "object" via an advanced S/W application that interpolates enlarged images & approximates hidden detail.

I still can't make any sense out of this object.



Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

[edit on 25-5-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]

Originally posted by jonhplayer
I dont know why anyone bothers posting ufo pics on here, they allways got shot down as fake within the first 3 or 4 replys, if i had a ufo pic id keep it to my self, at least id know the truth

Jonhplayer.....

That's a sweeping generalisation.....

I didn't "shoot it down".

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

Well, that does it. OP, get your stuff together and get the original - completely unedited - copy of the photo uploaded. Anyone asking for a copy of a photo of his windshield is wasting time and diverting energy. It's the original photo we all need, not a picture of his windshield. It's not the time of day he saw it, the direction he was traveling, the time of year, etc... (etc.. etc...), it's the God loving original photo.

That's it, that's your task. If you don't do that, well then this thread is pointless and your amazing sighting is going to be (rightfully) sh!t canned as a hoax. We all get that you're depressed and don't give a # about a lot of things or whatever, but if you truly witnessed and photographed advanced craft moments before it went inter-dimensional, well then do the right thing and get it verified. If real this is bigger than you, bigger than all of us.

All you need to do is upload the original photo. Being depressed is not an excuse, let's verify your amazing encounter or at least let us off the hook (if it's a hoax).

I don't know what the specific object is, but the white lines on it's edges are obviously done with the smoothing tool in PS.
This is a fake.

Originally posted by SparKzzz
I don't know what the specific object is, but the white lines on it's edges are obviously done with the smoothing tool in PS.
This is a fake.

SparKzzz.....

Unfortunately it looks a lot like that.

Also, the EXIF data confirms it's been through PS (see below as per my previous posts).

Also as per my previous posts, the op MUST e-mail the photos directly from his phone.....otherwise, this will all head in a negative direction.

Photo 1 with EXIF data (scroll right):



Photo 2 with EXIF data (scroll right):



Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

[edit on 25-5-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]