It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by colbe
The description in 12:1 is royal and we know via the Old Testament, the mother of the king is
queen.
Originally posted by DISRAELI
Originally posted by colbe
The description in 12:1 is royal and we know via the Old Testament, the mother of the king is
queen.
Incidentally, this is not so, strictly speaking.
The King's wife is the real Queen. And we all know that the church is the bride of Christ. QED again.
The normal title of the king's mother is "Queen Mother". (Rather than "king-mother", which was the idiotic invention of some British newspapers in the time when princess Diana was alive)
I hope you're not relying on the fact that Jehu called Jezebel "the queen your mother". Jezebel is hardly a good precedent. A model for ch17 rather than ch12.
edit on 21-8-2011 by DISRAELI because: (no reason given)
Yes, I know it does, and I was arguing rationally and legitimately from that reference.
Originally posted by colbe
The description in 12:1 is royal and we know via the Old Testament, the mother of the king is
queen.
My quote you pasted refers to the Queen.
To help, some more Scripture, proof, the mother not the wife is Queen.
Originally posted by DISRAELI
reply to post by St Udio
I warned Colbe to be wary about verbal coincidences. In this case the coincidence doesn't even appear in the text- the expression "Our lady" is post-Biblical.
Don't you think that the life of Nostradamus is a little trivial to be the fulfilment of this chapter? Especially with everything that it involves; the salvation of the world, the enmity with Satan, the "flight into the wilderness" to escape from Satan's revenge?
I think I've given enough reasoning to identify her as the more faithful counterpart of the harlot woman in ch17.
Originally posted by DISRAELI
Yes, I know it does, and I was arguing rationally and legitimately from that reference.
Originally posted by colbe
The description in 12:1 is royal and we know via the Old Testament, the mother of the king is
queen.
My quote you pasted refers to the Queen.
I was accepting the first part of your sentence and disputing the second. I was pointing out that it is the wife of the king, not the mother of the king, who is the queen. That is why your argument "This is about the queen, therefore it must be about the mother" is not valid.
To help, some more Scripture, proof, the mother not the wife is Queen.
You say this, but you don't actually offer any scriptural proof that "the mother is queen".
The normal usage of language is that the queen is the king's wife.
If you want to claim that the Old Testament goes against this normal use of language, then you must quote me an actual text that says so.
You then quote some Biblical references to the phrase "Queen Mother". I'm not sure why, because they're just giving Biblical support the to the same point I'm making; viz. that the mother of the King is called Queen Mother, not Queen.
Originally posted by colbe
God did not give you or me the authority to interpret Holy Scripture.
The Church who determined the Canon of Scripture was also given the authority by God to interpret the Bible. The same Church states the "woman" in Revelation 12:1 is Mary, Our Lord's mother.
Originally posted by colbe
"In today’s common understanding of a kingdom, it is the wife of the king who is the queen. But, in the kingdom of Israel, it was the mother of the king who was considered to be the queen."
Originally posted by ntech
My thought on the subject. The end times are a time of harvest. Separating of the good from the bad. I would refer you to the wheat and the tares parable of Matthew 13.
24 Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field:
25 But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way.
26 But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also.
27 So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? from whence then hath it tares?
28 He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?
29 But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.
30 Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.
I would pose the Harlot is the system created by the tares of the field. Those found to be unworthy. And the maiden is those found to be worthy. The wheat of the parable.
And that both women are descended from Israel.
Zechariah 13
8 And it shall come to pass, that in all the land, saith the LORD, two parts therein shall be cut off and die; but the third shall be left therein.
9 And I will bring the third part through the fire, and will refine them as silver is refined, and will try them as gold is tried: they shall call on my name, and I will hear them: I will say, It is my people: and they shall say, The LORD is my God.
Revelation 18
7 How much she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow.
8 Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her.
9 And the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication and lived deliciously with her, shall bewail her, and lament for her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning,
[edit on 31-7-2010 by ntech]
Originally posted by colbe
What a twisting effort you go to, to deny Mary is Queen of Heaven and Earth.
Scripture proves your "the wife is queen" to be wrong DESRA. And your last makes no sense. The mother of the King is called Queen but she is not Queen?
Originally posted by colbe
the message to Pelianito
Originally posted by DISRAELI
Originally posted by colbe
the message to Pelianito
Well, this is not scripture,is it? I could make up messages to support my own case, but I won't.
Incidentally, Hebrew scripture needs to be understood by the sense of the Hebrew, not by the sense of the Latin translation.
Originally posted by colbe
I can share Our Lord's recent words again...
message to Pelianito
Originally posted by DISRAELI
Originally posted by colbe
I can share Our Lord's recent words again...
message to Pelianito
It still isn't scripture, is it?
We are instructed to test prophets according to their teachings;
"If a prophet shall arise among you...and if he says to you "Let us go after other gods and let us serve them"...you shall not listen to the words of that prophet". Deuteronomy ch13 vv1-3.
To me, the "Immaculate Heart" is another god not mentioned in scripture. I will not listen to a prophet who is inviting me to venerate other gods.
edit on 23-8-2011 by DISRAELI because: (no reason given)