WikiLeaks to Release "History Making Stuff" Within Weeks?

reply to post by grantbeed


wikileaks, by their own admission, is a corrupt and non-trustworthy organization.

They edit film to pass their agenda. He's nothing more than a slightly more ....death friendly Michael Moore.

He said so on The Colbert Report:

We will try to get the maximum possible political impact.

....not the truth.


watch video here

[edit on 23-5-2010 by Snarf]

reply to post by gortex


I agree with you, History making would mean for the whole Planet and not just one Country like many would seem to believe.
American History is not something which goes very far beyond the USA Borders, British History would be the same, as would the History of France, Canada, Germany, The Netherlands, Russia would be far down the list because of secrets still to be discovered.

In fact in some places its even hard to find anyone inside the Border of many Countries who knows much about its own History, which is very evident sometimes.

History is for all Mankind, not any single group of people, they say History is written by the victors, that's only accepted History, real History are the words written by the observer who suffers with the down trodden, there are many versions and points of view of History, The Diary of Anne Frank, that is History, the discovery of Penicillin is History, the story told by a Child now living in a War zone who grows up to tell their real horrific story will one day be History.

Things like Oil spills, the supposed War between Islam and Christianity, like WMD's will be marked down under stupidity and Human error.

My guess, and thats all it is, is this will related to the death of a historical figure or otherwise be related in some way to same. I would say Princess Di, JFK or MLK.

A true rewriting of the history books would in fact be historical.

Right now we are sitting, making histories for our stuff.

No ?

Originally posted by Snarf
wikileaks, by their own admission, is a corrupt
and non-trustworthy organization.

where is the proof for that statement??
Where do they say that ????
I think they're quite trustworthy.
Or maybe you don't like them cuz they
don't follow your agenda???

Originally posted by Snarf
They edit film to pass their agenda.

And WHAT Major News Network does not do the
same exact thing??? Except in this case they
did release the entire un-edited version as well.
They did give both sides.

I actually believe that it is most likely proof of suppressed energy technologies that would liberate humanity but have been kept secret due to the oil cartel. It is either that or some medical or health breakthrough, perhaps a cure.

Just my opinion.

That guy gives me a vibe of the young dad from Back to the Future, only when he played the role of the villain in Charlie's Angels...
Sorry, I'm not good with actors' names.

I'm sure he means well, that's just the mental connection I make.

At any rate, I hope that whatever it is that will be making history is good and not some sort of spin.

Might also have to do with something that has been found in the excavations beneath the Sphinx ?

That , indeed , could prove to be 'history making' , if something of major importance were found .

Something along these lines could very well Re-write history as we know it ., thereby 'making' history , in and of itself .

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by grantbeed
I guess we shall find out soon enough if/when it happens.....

I bet it will be proof that the gulf spill
was intentional and who was responsible.

any takers on that bet ????

Funny, I was thinning the same thin. Find out which company(s) had the most to lose from domestic competition and you will find your culprit.

I'd love to hear from the company that was next in line to get a permit before the disaster. I bet they have an idea.

Anybody know how to look up permit applications for off-shore explporation?

Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by downtown436

 

You have any links to deaths from Wikileaks submissions, or are you just actually only stating your opinion?

Lol.

Do you think that the black bag assassination squad video tapes their hits, and posts them on the internet?

Most of the time when a whistle blower gets killed, it is ruled suicide, accident, single car accident, ect.

Debra Palfry is a good example. She was on the Alex Jones show saying that she would never commit suicide, and then shortly after, she hangs herself.(yeah right)

My money is on the IMF and probably linked to 911.
I think any link to the oil spill will be outdated by the time of this release, you wouldnt need to wait.
The news source would need to be removed from the source before they released any information for there own safety so the news would relate to something that would be an old event.
I like the idea of Obamas real birthplace or the real Roswell disclosure.
Or it could all still be hype to increase the sites donations before they shutdown.

Will be Afghanistan . Poor unarmed pheasants being blown to bits for no good reason. The first video showed maybe 15 people being killed , this one will show hundreds .

reply to post by bluemooone2


would this really be history changing though? Unless Wikileaks are just blowing their words out of proportion, I would think it's much bigger than this. (not that the war deaths are not important mind you)

g

[edit on 23-5-2010 by grantbeed]

Well i hope so. Might even make some people like Mark Levin think twice about what were doing over there. I think it would be important .

reply to post by Snarf


The problem is not the corruption, crime and wilful destruction of life and liberty.

It is the knowledge of it!

Wikileaks appear to be the last bastion of free news that one can obtain without interogation.

In a true democratic World, all newspapers would be reporting such material, and the authorities would be acting accordingly.

The next time you refer to Wikileaks as corrupt, please bear in the mind the bigger picture.

They released that information so not likely that the would consider that news worth holding on to. Whatever there intent it would have to be political in nature.

Originally posted by bluemooone2
Will be Afghanistan . Poor unarmed pheasants being blown to bits for no good reason. The first video showed maybe 15 people being killed , this one will show hundreds .

Not to diminish the killing of civilians but that would be extremely disappointing. People would watch it once say 'meh' and move on.

We need smoking gun evidence on Roswell, ET existance, 9/11, oil rig being a false flag, taping of a bilderberg meeting, something like that.

It needs to be huge to "make history", I really hope they've got something but they might just be blowing smoke. People need to be SHAKEN VIOLENTLY to wake up.. something minor just won't do these days, just like silent thunder said on page 2.
Although things might seem horrible or catastrophic we truly need something huge to happen as a catalysis to change.

Let's hope.. let's see.

It seems to me that with the recent secrecy surrounding the X-37B, it would not be out of the realm of possibilty, that the info they are referring to could be the true payload/nature of said space vehicle.

I mean would not the first tangible proof of the weaponization of space be by definition, "history making stuff"?

Just a thought.

Israel confirmed with documentation that they possess nuclear weapons. Exposed trying to sell them to South Africa.

Israel - is sooooooooooooooooo evil.

Will be about war crimes committed by the US. Either that, or CIA drug running, I wouldn't put my money on it, but I kinda hope that's what it is. it's time America should be faced with their own hypocrisy when poor people are being thrown into jail for selling the substances that the CIA are bringing into the country.