It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
reply to post by insideNSA
Do yourself a favor and respond after you watch those videos...
75 percent oil from Gulf of Mexico spill is gone: official
WASHINGTON — About three-quarters of the oil spilled from the ruptured BP well in the Gulf of Mexico has disappeared, a top US official said Wednesday.
"The scientists are telling us about 25 percent was not captured or evaporated or taken care of by mother nature," said Carol Browner, a top energy adviser to President Barack Obama, on the ABC network's "Good Morning America" programme.
"This is an initial assessment by our scientists in the government and outside the government. We think it's important to make this available to the public. That's what we'll be doing today."
Originally posted by Sean48
reply to post by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
I realize you are saying that there will be lasting damage, but that it isn't the
end of days.
I agree with that, we will definitely "deal" with this eco-damage.
My question to you Op , and I think that of others is:
Just how much Damage would you deem to acceptable?
Half the Gulf destroyed? One tenth?
What do you consider acceptable loss?
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
reply to post by insideNSA
As I said would happen...
75 percent oil from Gulf of Mexico spill is gone: official
WASHINGTON — About three-quarters of the oil spilled from the ruptured BP well in the Gulf of Mexico has disappeared, a top US official said Wednesday.
"The scientists are telling us about 25 percent was not captured or evaporated or taken care of by mother nature," said Carol Browner, a top energy adviser to President Barack Obama, on the ABC network's "Good Morning America" programme.
"This is an initial assessment by our scientists in the government and outside the government. We think it's important to make this available to the public. That's what we'll be doing today."
It will be less than that:
40% of the gushing was methane.
75% of the remaining 60% will be totally evaporated.
20% of that remaining 60% was wax.
3% of that remaining 60% was actual tar & asphalt.
How tragic that one fisherman literally committed suicide thanks to listening to insane people like you.
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
reply to post by insideNSA
You didn't actually respond to my post, and the hard numbers. This makes you a troll, as already realized. Guess I shouldn't have fed you, and I guess more fishermen should blow their brains out?
If you could show us some numbers on the actual toxicity of tar / asphalt that might give you an argument... oh wait tar isn't all that toxic. Tar is the part of 'oil' that sinks after it all separates via passing thru a mile of water and time etc. An asphalt blacktop a mile beneath the surface isn't the end of the whole wide world.
[edit on 18-8-2010 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss]
For every BP paid for propaganda false article you present I can counter with 3 real articles.
Really? Where?
Originally posted by Merigold
For every BP paid for propaganda false article you present I can counter with 3 real articles.
Really? Where?
You're one of those people that bought the Lindsey Williams "Oil Emergancy" DVD aren't you? You know the one, where is claimed to have inside knowledge that ZOMG we were all about to die...lol.
So anyway please show articles which are "real".
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
reply to post by insideNSA
Link #1: Some FLorida beaches are affected: up in the northern panhandle 'near' "water zero". This is maybe 5% tops of FL's 1200+ miles of beaches.
Links #2,3,4,5: All different articles on the same report.
Link #6: "Video" is a bad link. 80% of WHAT? It wasn't 100% used motor oil (like so many of you seem to envision) that came out of that gusher. I showed you the hard numbers of what came out of that gusher. Refute the numbers or sound like a crazy person.
Link #7: A restaurant owner says we'll never get over oil in his lifetime. That would sort of be like listening to you saying that and taking it as truth.
Link #8: A 4 page monster refresher course on oil estimates and immediate animal deaths. If there's something in there about long term damage please cite it.
Link #9: "BLUE PLAGUE"!!!!! That doesn't cite anything about oxygen depletion. Are there bacteria in the air feeding off of both the VOC vapors and oxygen, thus depleting the oxygen? By the way: All of those people being able to smell/etc the VOC's is proof that most of it evaporated.
Link #10: How is that any different than a natural oil seep? How do we know it isn't one?
Many of these links, and you still pushing on as if the oil gusher is still at max flow, and framing it all around immediate impact when the issue here is long term damage, and still acting like I ever said the immediate area wouldn't be directly impacted, is all rather odd. But at least you did use some bbcode this time.
Originally posted by p51mustang
"he who argues with a fool, is a fool"
while the populace is under chemical warfare attacks-
around the globe..corexit- and you can track nalco
up to the usual suspects.
want an area cleared?
spill and spray .