It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
All I can do is "lol" not at Obama and this idea, but at those who oppose it.
The president of the United States gives a possible solution to fix this ecological disaster and he gets crap for it. Better than what most of you could actually present.
I'm curious to see if this would even take place. If it does, it might just work. I'm not a scientist though, and neither are any of you.
[edit on 16-5-2010 by GorehoundLarry]
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by Soular System
Well from what I heard the gulf actually leaks oil naturally, I tried to find that source but couldn't,
So with that in mind, an explosion might not be a good plan.
The bottom line is that oil does indeed naturally seep from the seafloor in many places and that this seepage does, over time, add up to an awful lot of oil, rivaling some of the biggest human spills. But natural seeps have become part of the ecosystem (over long periods of time), while oil spills wreak massive ecological destruction.
Originally posted by ABNARTY
reply to post by Soular System
Some how this sounds like every monster movie from the 1950's. Detonate a nuclear device at depth, saturate the area with radiation, and then wait for giant mutant horse shoe crabs. Naturally they will attack a few lone vessels a long way out. Distress calls will be sent but no one will believe them. That is, of course, until the monsters make it ashore and commence reeking chaos and havoc. Pandemonium and destroyed Waffle Houses as far as the eye can see.
It sure does sound better than the "Junk Shot". Way more dramatic. Unless of course instead of grinding up old tire and golf balls, we grind up oil company CEO's and Wall Streeters trying to profit off the spill and stuff them in the pipe.
Originally posted by MysterE
I posted a couple of thread about the nuke option, one about this article in fact, and the overwhelming majority of ATS members are against the idea. I for 1 am in support of such a strategy to use explosives to dislodge earth to clog the hole, if fact, it worked for the Soviets on more then one occasion!
-E-
Originally posted by fordrew
The average person on this board and the average person anywhere else does not know what nuclear physics are. Most people think HUR HUR IT PROBABLY INVOLVES NUCLEAR BOMB. I suggest people study in any way shape or form about nuclear physics.
Well let me give a tiny little summary: all elements do not have the same amount of neutrons in them, that is called an isotope. They sometimes may also try to give away protons, electrons, neutrons in order to be stable. The act of emitting those extra atoms is called radiation.
So please do not assume that because the word nuclear is involved does not mean a nuclear weapon is involved too. So many idiots in this world I swear.
Originally posted by fordrew
reply to post by Soular System
and you are ignorant. Not once did the article state anything about using a nuclear weapon or bomb of any sort. You *sicken* me completely.
Every single post is talking about OMG THEY ARE GONNA BOMB THE OIL?
Read every single post on this thread NOW.
I then want you to apologize to me for being wrong. Go back and read the article carefully then read the other member's posts.
[edit on 16-5-2010 by fordrew]