It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Soular System
reply to post by legalizeit
Hmm, storing books in salt mines, storing seeds in the Arctic, wonder where they've hid the Ark?
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
British Petroleum Successfully Inserts New Pipe to Siphon Oil From Gulf of Mexico
Breaking news
Well, no nukes is good nukes, lol
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
British Petroleum Successfully Inserts New Pipe to Siphon Oil From Gulf of Mexico
Breaking news
Well, no nukes is good nukes, lol
Originally posted by Soular System
Ahhh, gotta love the smell of depleted uranium in your fish.
What happens if it makes the leak worse, then what?
[edit on 16-5-2010 by Soular System]
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I don't see how we can make any kind of judgment about this unless of course, we're nuclear experts or geologists or something... How can you pooh-pooh on an idea that you don't even understand?
I'm not saying this is the right way to go about it, but at least I admit that I don't have a clue how to fix this disaster. And if experts in the field think that somehow a nuclear 'something' might fix it, then I'm going to have to know more about it before I approve OR disapprove.
Having scientists look for a solution seems the most practical and effective next step to me... It's not like they're getting ready to set off a nuke and then see what happens.
Originally posted by Soular System
Now, what on earth are nuclear experts doing on an oil spill, other than they are thinking about blowing up the well head.
Not only will we have oil, and chemical dispersants, but now radiation?
I think we are most definitely headed toward a global catastrophe.
Blow a hole in the ocean, that'll fix it. Man, these people are insane.
www.telegraph.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I don't see how we can make any kind of judgment about this unless of course, we're nuclear experts or geologists or something... How can you pooh-pooh on an idea that you don't even understand?
I'm not saying this is the right way to go about it, but at least I admit that I don't have a clue how to fix this disaster. And if experts in the field think that somehow a nuclear 'something' might fix it, then I'm going to have to know more about it before I approve OR disapprove.
Having scientists look for a solution seems the most practical and effective next step to me... It's not like they're getting ready to set off a nuke and then see what happens.