It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by Just Wondering
yes, yes, disinfo backed up by facts and links UNLIKE the gloomers who use only feelings to back up their clams.
I"m leaving now and going back to Loam and ActivePatriot's threads. ActivePatriot was a skeptic like you for a day or so, and then he actually did some research.
Meanwhile, the Coast Guard announced the creation of a federal Flow Rate Technical Group to assess the actual flow rate from the well. Coast Guard Capt. Ron LaBrec said that Adm. Thad Allen would oversee the team, which will include members from the Coast Guard, the Minerals Management Service, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Department of Energy, the U.S. Geological Society and others from the science community and academia.
I was banned for my Username, Now I'm AP-Chris.
So which is it that got you banned??
Not only that, but I posted an article (which got me banned)
Originally posted by Just Wondering
And could you show me the 'sufering and death" that you speak of? show me suffering and death, show me, wanna see pics of suffering and death please.
Originally posted by Just Wondering
I was banned for my Username, Now I'm AP-Chris.
okay...
So which is it that got you banned??
Not only that, but I posted an article (which got me banned)
Ok, gimme a jingle in ten years time and we'll have a beer and the one that guessed right pays.
Originally posted by Lebowski achiever
You just wait and see. In 10 years time look back and you will be horrified at all that was destroyed and you will be depressed because recovery is not even in sight. I can understand why you would want to put your head in the sand. Ignorance is Bliss..
Few observable effects of oil spills on the small, passively drifting plants and animals composing the plankton have been uncovered in post-spill investigations. Some kills were observed during the Torrey Canyon spill among phytoplankton (plant plankton), but none among the zooplankton (animal plankton) (). In any case, the heavy use of chemical dispersants complicates the issue. Studies following the Santa Barbara blowout could detect no harmful effects on phytoplanktonic productivity () or zooplankton populations (). However, because plankton is passively carried about by water currents, it would be very difficult to discern effects in the field, especially in open waters like the English or Santa Barbara Channels.
Laboratory experiments have generally produced more tangible results, although the degree to which these results may be extrapolated to natural conditions is open to question. As early as 1935, Galtsoff et al () found that growth in cultures of diatoms, which are important components of the phytoplankton, was inhibited by high concentrations of oil. Russian workers have also found that various diatom species are sensitive to kerosene and fuel oils (). Recently, researchers have found that water extracts of various crude and fuel oils and dispersants may inhibit growth of phytoplankters (), or affect the rate of photosynthesis (). However, it is difficult to relate the results of most of these studies to what might actually be experienced in the marine environment, because either the actual concentrations of hydrocarbons in the experimental water was unreported or the concentrations used in the experiments are unrealistically high. Gordon and Prouse () did use experimental concentrations that realistically might be found in polluted coastal areas or near spills. They found that, at concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in solution below 10 to 30 parts per billion (ppb), photosynthesis was stimulated. Concentrations of the crude and refined oils tested of from 60 to 200 ppb suppressed photosynthesis to varying degrees. Number 2 fuel oil had the greatest effect and depressed photosynthesis by 60 percent at concentrations between 100 and 200 ppb. These results indicate that there is a possibility of both stimulation and inhibition of photosynthesis in areas subject to chronic oil pollution or in the vicinity of a heavy oil spill.
The larvae or young of many benthic and fish species spend time as members of the zooplankton. They are often much more susceptible to toxicants than adults. Larvae of the intertidal barnacle (Elminius modestus) were shown to be killed by 100 parts per million (ppm) of fresh crude oil (). Crude oils have also been shown to be toxic to the planktonic eggs and larvae of some fishes, including cod and herring ().
In addition to potentially acute effects of oil spills on planktonic organisms, there has been concern about the long-term effects of floating oil and tar lumps, which have become alarmingly common on the high seas. If the concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in ocean surface waters are being increased by shipping discharges or atmospheric input, there would certainly be concern for the near-surface plankton so important to oceanic productivity. Data on hydrocarbon concentrations in seawater are remarkably scant and historical data are nonexistent, thus making it impossible to predict future trends and effects of oil on the oceanic ecosystem.
NEUSTON
A unique, but poorly studied, assemblage of organisms lives right at or just below the surface of the sea, the neuston. Because of their intimate contact with floating oil, it is difficult to imagine that neustonic organisms would not suffer toxic or mechanical effects of contact with fresh oil slicks. Concern has been expressed for the community of highly adapted organisms associated with Sargassum, which floats over much of the North Atlantic. It is significant to note that petroleum hydrocarbon contamination of Sargassum plants and animals has been reported (). Some research is now in progress in Bermuda on the effects of floating oil on the Sargassum community. Unfortunately, the ecology of neustonic organisms is very poorly known, and the effects on it of floating oil can only be surmised.
www.fordfound.org...
Originally posted by bluemooone2
Estimates put the size of this spill at about 1/2 the size of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and its getting bigger by the day. After 25 years if you dig a little ways down in to the beach in some areas there , you will still find globs of oil.