It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It would be interesting to know what your definition is for the term, 'average gun nut'.
Originally posted by pieman
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
They're trying to "treat" away his point of view.
For me to have a problem with that you're going to have to convince me that they shouldn't. They seem to be treating this guy differently to your average gun nut.
Originally posted by tigpoppa
well lets look at the facts. he is not in the military and has alot of guns. People like this always snap eventually, especially those with grudges against the American way of life and our government. This person is from the bottom of society, obviously not a doctor lawyer or scientist. Good thing he is locked up, thats alot easier then I would have been on these liberals who cant stand our freedoms. I would suggest exectution or failing taht at least castration so this type of person cant multiply. Only real americans should be allowed here and if they dont like it and want to stockpile arms to hunt down our children in the streets like dogs, we should deport them to australia and see how they like it there.
Freedom is a precious thing and people like this only end up in towers at Texas A&M. being a ward of the state isnt enough, this is why we need reeducation camps in this country for those who never completed at least a masters. In these camps people like this could learn what it is to be a true american. Republicans are going to take back washington with a vengeance and people like this will have no place in the america of tomorrow. People like this need to be kept busy, idle hands do the devils work. We are a services economy now as per the real President of the USA Bush, since this person wasnt working hard enough to contribute I say good riddance to rubbish.
[edit on 11-5-2010 by tigpoppa]
Most people are assumed to be sane in society.
Originally posted by pieman
Originally posted by havok
I'm assuming the wife thought he was crazy and turned him in.
What's your basis for assuming he's sane?
Originally posted by pieman
A threat to shoot any government who want to take your weapons is seen as admirable.
Originally posted by pieman
What's your basis for assuming he's sane?
Originally posted by pieman
reply to post by thisguyrighthere
There is no evidence presented in this thread that the police acted incorrectly.
There is no evidence presented in this thread that the judiciary acted incorrectly.
There is no evidence presented in this thread that this is type of action will be widely applied to weapons owners.
There is no evidence presented in this thread of re-education.
There is no evidence presented in this thread that the guy will be detained or sent anywhere.
All I have found in this thread is a story about a guy who has had his rifles removed following an investigation based on the fact that his wife reported him to police as being a danger to the public. That hardly seems a basis for concern.
Presenting something as a basis for concern when it clearly isn't is a classic misinformation technique designed to ratchet up tension.
You seem to be indulging, I'ld love to know why.
Arresting a man on a string of charges that did not hold up in court seems highly inefficient if nothing else.
Originally posted by pieman
reply to post by thisguyrighthere
There is no evidence presented in this thread that the police acted incorrectly.
He must also continue to take proper medication, and surrender all weapons and military gear taken upon his arrest.