It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WolfofWar
A doctor who is trying to sell a new book, a book that would sell more with sensationalist ideas than with logic and facts.
I mean, what would you rather read:
"Why the E-culture is killing your child"
"Why nothing has ever changed, and we need to stop panicking."
Read between the lines, look at the reasons behind the reasons.
Originally posted by WolfofWar
If he didn't take the time to provide his facts, I'm not going to waste my time in doing so.
The study, funded by the U.S. Department of Justice, found that the percentage of children who reported being physically bullied over the past year had declined from nearly 22 percent in 2003 to under 15 percent in 2008. The percentage reporting they’d been assaulted by other youths, including their siblings, dropped from 45 percent to 38.4 percent.
Rate Per 1,000 Students Ages 12-18 Contrary to public perception, violent crime in schools has declined dramatically since 1994. The annual rate of serious violent crime in 2007 (40 per 1,000 students)was less than half of the rate in 1994. These data are victim reports collected as part of the National Crime Victimization Survey and are not derived from school records.
The dramatic decline in juvenile homicides (and other juvenile violent crime) in the 1990s demonstrates that the observed decline in school violence is part of a larger national trend. This decline cannot be attributed to a decline in the juvenile population because the juvenile population increased. There are likely multiple factors responsible for the drop, including declining violence associated with drug gangs, effective community-oriented law enforcement efforts, as well as numerous school and community-based efforts to prevent violence. was less than half of the rate in 1994.
Originally posted by WolfofWar
Percentage of Students Who Feel Afraid at School or on the Way to School, By Ethnicity
Students feel safer in school, and incidents in school have decreased dramatically.
Q: Cutting, self-harm, does seem pathological. How prevalent is it?
A: It used to be very rare, less than one per cent of kids in a community would do this. In a 2008 study from the Yale school of medicine where they talked to girls 10 to 14 years of age, 36 per cent said they had in the past year cut themselves with razors or burned themselves with matches. In a very well-executed study published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal two years ago, a demographically representative sample of young people 14 to 21 years of age was surveyed in Victoria, and there was an overall prevalence of roughly 16 per cent. Although in the abstract there’s no mention of sex differences, if you pull up the tables you see that only eight per cent of boys but 24 per cent of girls were cutting or burning themselves.
Q: Do boys and girls cut for the same reasons?
A: The way to answer that is to talk about who is doing this. It’s a small subset of boys, and they are, bluntly, the boys who have no friends, who are ostracized. The guy who’s captain of the hockey team, who’s popular, is not secretly cutting himself with razor blades. But the girl who’s very popular, captain of the basketball team and doing well in school, is as likely—maybe even more likely—than the average girl to be cutting.
Q: Why would successful girls do this?
A: Because they haven’t been living, they’ve been performing. The girls themselves tell you, “I cut myself because it’s real, it’s not fake.” It’s not a cry for help: most girls don’t want adults knowing they’re cutting, which is why they cut in places we won’t see, like high up on the inner thigh. And they don’t want to kill themselves. There’s research which is quite astonishing to many people: when girls cut themselves, they are getting a release of endogenous opiates—they’re actually getting high.
Originally posted by mryanbrown
reply to post by intrepid
People cutting themselves is their issue. A secondary issue. Not an immediate consequence of bullying.
The bullys are not doing the physical harm, people are doing it to themselves.
Originally posted by mryanbrown
reply to post by WolfofWar
I agree with Wolf. The data supports the inescapable fact that statistically physical bullying is on the decline. Though online bullying may be more pervasive...
Those kids need to shut up and press the block/ignore button. Or learn to defend themselves by countering with intelligent statements (as the interner is non-physical, it gives these crybabies an opportunity to express themselves with language) [See: IRC]
The media hype over bullying is a charade at social engineering. To over a hype a non-existant issue really as a ploy to change social mentality to accept legislation to make insulting people or being rude illegal.
Just like the UK. Yay 1st amendment :]
Don't like it? Being bullied at school? PRESS CHARGES.
Don't like it? Being bullied online? PRESS THE BLOCK BUTTON.
problem solved.
Originally posted by crimson tears shini
the point is most of these sites don't have good enough systems in place to defend those in harms way.