It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JIMC5499
Originally posted by turbofan
Apparently a couple of you are overlooking the point and are too blind to acknowledge it.
Maybe someone can read the line about the reporter (Shapiro) stating
that he was told that Larry was going to pull the building by NYPD/Con Ed
workers.
"Pull it"
"He was talking about the firemen!"
"Pull it." or "PULL OUT" Which one did he say? Since "Pull it" has no meaning in that situation, I'm pretty sure it was "Pull out". Silverstein does have a bit of an accent in his voice.
Originally posted by iamcpc
Jeffrey Scott Shapiro is a former Washington, D.C. prosecutor and investigative reporter
www.foxnews.com...
My investigation into 9/11 conspiracy theories and urban legends led me to interview both American and Israeli intelligence officials as well as representatives of the Afghan Northern Alliance, FBI, NYPD and sources within the Muslim community of New York City.
Although I found trace evidence that vague rumors circulated within the Arab-American community that “something was going to happen” in “lower downtown Manhattan” on Sept. 11, I found no evidence of any conspiracy other than the one hatched by Al Qaeda that was later confirmed by the 9/11 Commission.
Since Al Qaeda once operated out of the Alkifah Refugee Center on Atlantic Avenue in Brooklyn and had many low level operatives working in the NYC area, it did not surprise me that rumors of their plan had leaked within the Arab-American community of New York. Many similar rumors and reports occur frequently, however, and so I have never faulted the Arab-American community or our government for not acting upon them.
In no instance did I ever once talk to one source who even hinted the American government had any foreknowledge or involvement in the Sept. 11 attacks. As an investigative reporter who survived the collapse of Building 7 and doggedly investigated 9/11 conspiracy theories in the wake of the attack, I am convinced the 9/11 “Truther” movement is nothing more than a paranoid, delusional pack of lies.
I was there.
I know what happened, and there is no single credible piece of evidence that implicates the United States of America in the Sept. 11 attacks.
A lot of fire fighters came forward and told the truth but all are under threat that they will loss pensions, jobs if they breath another word.
Internet lie.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
reply to post by Goethe
How would "dancing mossad" implicate the United States government in the attacks of 9/11? Is it a racehorse, because it sounds like one?
Originally posted by Goethe
Originally posted by iamcpc
Jeffrey Scott Shapiro is a former Washington, D.C. prosecutor and investigative reporter
www.foxnews.com...
My investigation into 9/11 conspiracy theories and urban legends led me to interview both American and Israeli intelligence officials as well as representatives of the Afghan Northern Alliance, FBI, NYPD and sources within the Muslim community of New York City.
Although I found trace evidence that vague rumors circulated within the Arab-American community that “something was going to happen” in “lower downtown Manhattan” on Sept. 11, I found no evidence of any conspiracy other than the one hatched by Al Qaeda that was later confirmed by the 9/11 Commission.
Since Al Qaeda once operated out of the Alkifah Refugee Center on Atlantic Avenue in Brooklyn and had many low level operatives working in the NYC area, it did not surprise me that rumors of their plan had leaked within the Arab-American community of New York. Many similar rumors and reports occur frequently, however, and so I have never faulted the Arab-American community or our government for not acting upon them.
In no instance did I ever once talk to one source who even hinted the American government had any foreknowledge or involvement in the Sept. 11 attacks. As an investigative reporter who survived the collapse of Building 7 and doggedly investigated 9/11 conspiracy theories in the wake of the attack, I am convinced the 9/11 “Truther” movement is nothing more than a paranoid, delusional pack of lies.
I was there.
I know what happened, and there is no single credible piece of evidence that implicates the United States of America in the Sept. 11 attacks.
ummmmmm. How about two simple words.... ABLE DANGER
How about another 2 simple words..... DANCING MOSSAD
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
reply to post by Goethe
Then I'd assume you have this evidence?
The "dancing Mossad", the first responders who implicate the US government, the warnings not to fly.
Or are they just internet rumours and speculation?
Originally posted by vipertech0596
No, I didnt miss it. I know that you are not going to rig a building for demolition in short order. I would suggest it is you (among others) who is trying to read way too much in what Mr Silverstein has said about that day.
Originally posted by micpsi
the technology was in place to demolish WTC7 not in a few weeks but in a few hours. This means that the SAME technology could have been used to blow up WTC1 & WTC2 - a highly significant implication.
[edit on 10-5-2010 by micpsi]
Originally posted by bsbray11
And he wasn't just thinking it over to himself, he was telling this to other people, so that people on the ground even knew and apparently believed it was a serious possibility.
I'm sure it means nothing at all to you, but the same building was also occupied by DoD, CIA, and Secret Service offices, along with IRS, SEC, and financial and banking tenants. It's safe to assume there was a sensitive information in that building (actually it's a confirmed fact that there was at least sensitive SEC information related to several ongoing investigations, such as Enron) and Mr. Silverstein would have to take that into account if he were considering demolishing this building.
First Silverstein said that he said the smartest thing to do would be to "pull it" that day, and they made that decision to "pull it" and then watched the building collapse. And people said, oh, he never meant demolish it, that would be impossible. Now someone admits yes, Silverstein was seriously considering demolishing the building that day. But oh, no big deal, that doesn't mean anything. What if next they admit, yes, WTC7 was demolished, to protect sensitive information inside, and it was safely and legally pre-rigged and if it had come down any other way it would have resulted in a lot more damage? Once again you would no doubt say, "Oh, ok. Well still nothing to see here, move along!" We really have a sharp crowd here.
[edit on 10-5-2010 by bsbray11]
Originally posted by vipertech0596
And again, reading way too much into it and assigning motive.
Standing there, looking at the damage, the unchecked fires..yeah, I would be thinking that the building is going to have to come down and yeah, I would be calling the insurance company to talk about the options.