Alleged NASA -Affiliated Astronomer Deciphers 'Intelligence' Signal From Nearby Stars

Originally posted by LadySambuca
I have seen the pictures you posted and it is defnitely her. I am not mistaking. Maybe she was doing something else at the site in Chile if you cannot find credentials but my husband said she was doing the settings on the dishes so they can point to the satellites. I dont know how those things work because I am in IT.

I have actually met this woman and I do not think any of you have. It is a great coincidence that there can be 2 Judy Faltskog's working for Nasa ? This woman was really working there because security was very igh and my husband also worked there.

1) Radio telescopes are used to observe stars and the interstellar medium, not satellites. They CAN be used as satellite stations with the proper tuning, but then they aren't radio telescopes, they are receiving stations. Your husband should know that, and it was wrong of him to pull your leg in that manner.

2) Settings on dishes to point at satellites are nothing more than calculating azimuth and altitude for the suspected location of the satellite, then physically 'shooting' the coordinates and pointing the dish at them, wobbling it slightly to adjust signal strength before locking down the armature. After that, the armature itself takes care of the tracking, as that is how it is designed, and why the armatures are designed for specific Earth latitudes - to facilitate the tracking. It's not really "rocket science", it's more in the vein of engineering and surveying. I know this because I had a stint setting up parabolic dishes when I was younger. That's how I came by my 3 meter dish.

3) TWO "Judy Faltskogs" working for NASA? So far, no one, not even NASA themselves, have been able to uncover even ONE Judy Faltskog working for NASA! So please, if you do indeed have photographic evidence, post it by all means and shut this line of inquiry down. We'd love to see it, as confirmation, so we can move on to the next!

I dont know much about satellites and stuff. My husband was working for a company in Germany and they sent my husband and myself and my daughter to Chile in a group. They were working for Nasa on a contract. It was a long time, a few months. Judy Faltskog was in this same group from Germany.

I think I am wasting my time. It seemed like you were looking fore this person and I thought I could help because I realized you will never find her because you do not even know if you are looking for a man or a woman. So I thought I might at least help to tell you she was definitely a woman and I know she was working there with my husband and you can say what you want. I think out of all the people here, I am the only one who ever met this woman. I will find the photo and copy it but it is just a print so I do not know what the queality will be like.

My husband did not joke with me. This was long ago and I do notg know the terms these people use as I am not into satellites or stars and dishes and stuff. So it does not really help to explain these things to me. I design It systems and processes.

I see you have said a few times you have evidence but you do not bring it to the front but now you ask me for evidence ? The only evidence I have is that I clearly remember this womans face because she ruined my life and I of all people should know if I see a picture of her again. She has a very distinct face which cannot be mistaken.

I try to help you and now you are discrediting me ? What kind of a person are you, you attacking everybody and anybody. I have no motivation to lie. I just thought I would help point you in the right direction but you are attacking me now and at the same time I feel humiliated.

And also, I am not saying she ios working for Nasa now. I know at that time, she was working for Nasa with my husband. I am trying to remember the name of the company my husband and Judy Faltskog worked for and then I will let you know.

So it does not help to look for he at Nasa now. My daughter did not want to have anything to do with the baby her father had with this woman which is a pity because then we would have been able to trace the baby back to its mother.

You seem to accept when people agree with what you say, like Nitromaria. Now I come with even more evidence and facts and you say I am confusing tis woman just because I do not say she is a manand that she had my husbands baby ?

I do not understand how you can still argue whether she is a woman:

1) Nitromaria's husband said she is a woman
2) My husband said she is a woman
3) I met her (and saw her practically naked) and she is a woman and I should know because I am a woman.
4) She had my husband's baby
5) She possibly had Nitromaria's husband's baby
6) She had 2 other children at the time. They called her mom and they looked exactly like her. There was this Christmas things for the children where they handed out presents and that was where I saw her for the second time with her children. At least at the time it was cold and her boobs were covered with a thick jersey !

So I cannot understand how you can say I am confusing her or lying ????

Just because I do not say what you want or what you like, you try to humiliate me and make me seem confused or make me a liar ? This is really not nice. We call this cyber-bullying !

reply to post by LadySambuca


You stated:

I try to help you and now you are discrediting me ? What kind of a person are you, you attacking everybody and anybody. I have no motivation to lie. I just thought I would help point you in the right direction but you are attacking me now and at the same time I feel humiliated.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
well lets count them:


1. You will not believe what I am going to tell you now ! She fell pregnant with which she said was my husband's child, a boy and my husband left me for this b****. My husband did not stand by me when our girl was born but this woman somehow influenced him that he was actually there when she gave birth. I was so upset I could strangle the baby and the mother and my ex !!!

2.She was Judith Faltskog. At the time she must have been about 28 - 30 years old but she is very tall about 6 feet but she had this beautifull body and very big boobs


3.Well, it worked because my husband ran after her at the time and the damage done at that time, made us divorce !!

4.I dont know but from what I remember she was a very sexy woman

5.I just thought I will share this with you because I was so shocked to see she had another baby even at this age because she must be around 40ish now ! She just never stops !!

6.I will have to try and scan it or take a photo with my cellphone but I will try.

7.This woman is a heartless baby-factory ! I wonder how many children she had after that 3rd one with my husband and if this one with Nitromaria's husband is the 4th one or how many children did she have. One would swear she is the mother of all nations, going around making babies everywhere !! And who supports these babies.

8.I cannot believe all of this ! That she is still active. When will she stop !! !!!

9.I am not mistaking. Maybe she was doing something else at the site in Chile if you cannot find credentials but my husband said she was doing the settings on the dishes so they can point to the satellites. I dont know how those things work because I am in IT.

10.This woman was really working there because security was very igh and my husband also worked there.

11.So it does not help to look for he at Nasa now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Apears like they are all lies to me. My documents are mainly already posted with other peoples documents in this very thread.

It is physically impossible for Judy to get pregnant.

NASA is checking up on all files new and old on the fake Dr. Judy

For designing IT systems you sure don't understand photos and systems

Judy is not sexy to anyone that is not canine

Judy Falkstog is a scam artist and a hoaxer with overwhelming proof







[edit on 21-8-2010 by dcmb1490]

reply to post by LadySambuca


oh dear judy, do you never learn?. anyway im glad you're posting because it adds to the page ranking and leads more people to the evidence about you, wayne and your little scams.

we can play this game forever if you like, im quite happy to carry on as long as my life permits me, and im younger than you so i think i might just outlast you.

the more you play this game the more people find out what you really are, so maybe it will be best for you to admit the to the silly hoax and call time on your immoral and fraudulent career of lies.

dont you think you have caused the children of janice and marion enough hurt and embarrassment ?.

thanks

rich

[edit on 21-8-2010 by RICH-ENGLAND]

Originally posted by LadySambuca
I dont know much about satellites and stuff. My husband was working for a company in Germany and they sent my husband and myself and my daughter to Chile in a group. They were working for Nasa on a contract. It was a long time, a few months. Judy Faltskog was in this same group from Germany.

Fair enough. I've never known NASA to send entire family groups to contract job sites, but I suppose it's not impossible. I AM, however, absolutely certain that Judy was not contracted to NASA for such work, since she posesses none of the necessary credentials.

Maybe she was just a camp follower. From the descriptions of her sexual antics, that seems to be about her speed, anyhow.

I think I am wasting my time. It seemed like you were looking fore this person and I thought I could help because I realized you will never find her because you do not even know if you are looking for a man or a woman. So I thought I might at least help to tell you she was definitely a woman

Oh, make no mistake, we know the quarry, and can tell gender differences. 'She' is a woman NOW (albeit without a full compliment of the plumbing for one), but started out as a man earlier in life. That much has been established, and the evidence is already present in this very thread. No one, so far, has been able to present any evidence to the contrary other than 'anecdotal' evidence, which is always suspect without hard verification.

For example, I could CLAIM that I MYSELF was a 'NASA scientist', and have every bit as much evidence to back that up as Judy has been able to present (which is NONE). I do not make that claim. I KNOW a couple of NASA engineers, but that doesn't MAKE me one. I haven't got those credentials, and neither does Judy.

and I know she was working there with my husband and you can say what you want.

Perhaps, but NOT as any sort of 'NASA scientist'. Do they import cooks and such for their job sites, too?

I think out of all the people here, I am the only one who ever met this woman. I will find the photo and copy it but it is just a print so I do not know what the queality will be like.

Please do. That would add some credence. We'll wait.

My husband did not joke with me. This was long ago and I do notg know the terms these people use as I am not into satellites or stars and dishes and stuff. So it does not really help to explain these things to me. I design It systems and processes.

Fair enough.

I see you have said a few times you have evidence but you do not bring it to the front but now you ask me for evidence ?

This thread is shot full of our evidence, none of which has as yet been countered.

The only evidence I have is that I clearly remember this womans face because she ruined my life and I of all people should know if I see a picture of her again.

Your individual memory is not 'evidence' to any one else. For it to be evidence, it must be backed with something that they can examine as well. We can't see your memories.

She has a very distinct face which cannot be mistaken.

As well as a very distinct adam's apple...

I try to help you and now you are discrediting me ?

I can't discredit you if you back your claims up, now can I?

What kind of a person are you,

A very evil one, I'm told.

you attacking everybody and anybody.

Attack? I've done no such thing! I've merely questioned, and pointed out inconsistencies. Trust me, should I ever go on the attack, it's unmistakable. Several posters at ATS can verify that.

I have no motivation to lie. I just thought I would help point you in the right direction but you are attacking me now and at the same time I feel humiliated.

No reason to feel "attacked", or "humiliated".... unless, of course, you can't back up your claims, and expect them to be taken on faith. I'm afraid faith is in short supply when the claims are unbacked, and contradict all the known facts...

It is funny how things start to come back to my mind now that it is stimulated after all these years. I remember my husband told me this woman is so fit and has stamina because she was the one who had to climb up the big satellite dishes when sometring broke or had to be replaced and she would hang from those life saving ropes (cant remember what you call them), you know those cabes they use for safety when people hang off high places.

The photo I have of her is where her hair is darker. I am not sure if she is blonde and made her hair dark or if she was a bottle blonde. It looked more like she has brownish hair but at that time she was as blonde as can be !!

I am still looking for the photo and I will post it as soon as I find it. There was another one but I think I lost that one over the years. I am not even sure why I kept the photos.

reply to post by LadySambuca


hahaha, that post was laughable and extremely embarrassing, so now you're telling us that you are an electonic engineer/ electrician as well as an astronomer and physicist?.

sorry but the scientists do not go climbing and fixing dishes!. especially when working for a huge company like nasa!.

thanks for coming though, you just made me laugh a lot

thanks

rich

Monkey Magic ?? What an apporpriate name !! Well done

Well, I am soon to burst all of your bubbles with the photo. I have found it and I will post it soon and you can scrutinize it left, right and center and use any method to try and proof it is not for real but you will not succeed because... you know what ? This photo is the same photo I got 16 years ago and it has not been touched since then.

Just wait... this is going to be the biggest moments of your lives.. boobs and all !!!

reply to post by LadySambuca


That's great. I just hope you not going to try and pass off that pic of the lady at the South African RAO again. its already been debunked. and if you need help loading that pic just U2 me.

reply to post by LadySambuca


hurry up then, and dont forget that we can check the exif data for any anomalies and evidence of tampering, thats if you even know what exif data is? lol.

and you can post whatever pictures you like, it still isn't going to change the legal documents i have in my possession proving that you was once a known and proven hoaxer called james van greunen.

and it won't change the wategate link where you tried to re establish contact with your ex wife janice!.

thanks

rich

I dont know about SA ROA lady ? ROA ??

Anywayz... I do know about photos because moi managed to scan ze photo... again Boobs and all.... I meant boots and all !

So now I do need your help because this is my first time on this site, so... please help, how do I post it. It is in my folder and in my buffer.... yeah, you heard right, my buffer. Yes, I do know what the computers buffer is !

So what now ? How do I get it from my buffer to you guys.. bloodhounds awaiting the unwelcome evidence of this woman who ruined my life !! ??

reply to post by LadySambuca


let me contact my IT guy and get back to you. He understands things like computer systems and the such. Hang on to your cable and buffers.

reply to post by LadySambuca


i already told you that a photo is not going to change anything, ive got photos of you when you were james, i also have legal documents, many that i cannot post on here for various reasons but should i feel the need I WILL post them all over the internet.

so don't waste your time posting pictures because it will prove absolutely nothing, unlike the things i have.....

thanks

rich

Hey Wise Monkey Man !! (Escaped from Planet of the Apes??)

Anywayz... NO I DONT KNOW what exif is, because unlike you I have a life outside ATS ! I dont sit on my PC all day trying to post pics of poor innocent souls out there. I am trying to imagine what kind of person you are, trying to discredit anybody who does not agree with you, with or without evidence Mr. Nitromaria ? I am sure that is a profile one of you created to strengthen your stories !

Anyaway, I know my photo is for real because I have the original taken with the old non-digital camera LOL Non-digital photo ?? Does that mean it is an ANALOGUE photo LOL !!!!!

Anyway please help me, I need to get this photo to you. Now please do not go an relief yourselves once I have posted tghis photo !!

reply to post by LadySambuca


hmm, someone resorting to chldish insults already, a little bit like various other members that we know....

and sorry judy, but unlike you i really have absolutely no need to create fake accounts to strengthen my story because i have many legal documents that can be traced back to the souces to prove my claims.....

and ill repeat, you can post whatever pictures you like and as many as you like but it can not and will not change a thing, you still will have been james, van greunen, you still will have been and still are a known and proven hoaxer, i will still have my legal documents and the wategate link will still be there and last but not least

RADIO TELESCOPES STILL WILL NOT RECEIVE ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT !!!!!

thanks

rich

Originally posted by LadySambuca
I do not understand how you can still argue whether she is a woman:

1) Nitromaria's husband said she is a woman

Ah, but I don't believe he swore she actually produced babies, only taht SHE claimed to be pregnant, and was fishing for money for an alleged abortion... besides, he's a philanderer, a horndog. His testimony is suspect as well, as well as biased. You don't really think he'd admit to having a fling with a MAN, do you?

2) My husband said she is a woman

My asessment of Nitromaria's EX husband applies to your as well.

3) I met her (and saw her practically naked) and she is a woman and I should know because I am a woman.

Perhaps you can explain why her prodigious pectoral pulchritude is not present in ANY of her pictures, then? You're being a woman yourself is actually irrelevant to assessing 'her' gender. I myself am a man, and I submit that THAT qualifies me to spot women in a crowd every bit as well as if I were a woman.

4) She had my husband's baby

That is a so far unsubstantiated claim.

5) She possibly had Nitromaria's husband's baby

Nitromaria doesn't think so, so why do you?

6) She had 2 other children at the time. They called her mom and they looked exactly like her.

How curious. I have a friend who has raised 8 children, all of whom call her 'mom'. She is barren, but has not let that stop her. No matter. It's also a curious fact that JAMES has two children.

Coincidence?

There was this Christmas things for the children where they handed out presents and that was where I saw her for the second time with her children.

Was that in Chile as well, or was it back in Germany? Careful how you answer THAT one...

At least at the time it was cold and her boobs were covered with a thick jersey !

Did it make them go away altogether?

So I cannot understand how you can say I am confusing her or lying ????

Confusion - mainly because of your insistence that 'she' physically bore children, a patent impossibility.

Nor have I actually said you are 'lying' anywhere. What I HAVE said, and still maintain, is that you are making unsubstantiated (and probably unsubstantiable) claims.

Back them up. If you can do that, you're one up on both Judy AND Wayne.

Just because I do not say what you want or what you like, you try to humiliate me and make me seem confused or make me a liar ?

What I want or what I like has no bearing on it at all. What you can SUBSTANTIATE is all that matters. As for any sort of 'humiliation', you are apparently unfamiliar with the term. You been subjected to NO humiliation... yet.

Perhaps it would be better if you could provide some evidence, and humiliate ME? I LIVE for that day!

This is really not nice.

I have nowhere claimed to be 'nice', and in fact I am NOT very nice at all. What I AM is fair. bring your evidence, and force me to back down. Please.

We call this cyber-bullying !

Careful of your choice of phrase. I have seen that EXACT turn of phrase used in this thread before, by the proxies (sock-puppets) of another, very particular, individual.

Can you guess who?

Aaahhh ... Mr.Monkey Man is getting cold feet now that we are about to post the photo !! Trying to get me out of doing it ? Look, I am not trying to defend this woman, I am trying to help you find her.. yes, HER not him. Looking for a HIM you will never find HER. And looking for someone with zilch boobs, is not going to lead you to her. So I am trying to show you she is a HER and she does have BIG boobs, extra big, wish I had boobs like that .. ouch.. I have a small B cup.

I think Nitromaria is actually Mr.Monkey Man with wild fantasies of what 'her' husband did with Dr. Judy Faltskog !

DCMB, Thanks for trying to help. I am awaiting your feedback.

Originally posted by RICH-ENGLAND

sorry but the scientists do not go climbing and fixing dishes!. especially when working for a huge company like nasa!.

Precisely, Rich. Those persons who climb, adjust, and tighten are called 'technicians', because they do technical stuff.

'Scientists' are called that because they do 'science stuff', and can't be bothered to clamber about and tighten bolts and such.