It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
This is a horrible catastrophy and I wish the mechanics, engineers, clean-up crews the best of luck!
On the other hand portraying this as the worst spill ever, end of the oceans, etc is just not realistic.
The worst oil spill ever, in the Persian Gulf in 1991, spilled about 430,000,000 gallons of oil.
At the rate of 100,000 barrels a day (100,000 according to CNN and BP an hour ago) this spill needs to stay full force like this for 11 years to equal the spill in the Persian Gulf.
Horrible? of course - worst ever? Not even close.
Originally posted by Udo Hohnekamp Lux.
I think the above writer is correct.
No way will this hole have a diameter of 5 feet. Somebody must
have misread feet for inch.
That would reduce the surface of the pipe´s circle to 1/144.
With 70,000 psi (pressure from core minus ocean head ?)
and only 800 to of oil spill now, it can certainly not be 5 feet wide.
I don´t think we have the technology to drill 1,5 km deep with
a 5 feet wide drill.
Originally posted by believer81
Some of you hippies need to grow up and educate yourselves. If it wasn't for petroleum products you'd all still be living in caves. Maybe wood huts if you're lucky.
Society needs oil and oil producers so get over it.
[edit on 3/5/2010 by believer81]
Originally posted by ickylevel
Originally posted by kingofmd
Does anyone else wonder how the oil has been able to maintain such a high pressure for "millions and millions" of years, beings that rock is porous?
No. Rock is not as "porous" as you may think . There is air in it but no "holes" that would let something pass trough.
[edit on 3-5-2010 by ickylevel]
Originally posted by believer81
Originally posted by Udo Hohnekamp Lux.
I think the above writer is correct.
No way will this hole have a diameter of 5 feet. Somebody must
have misread feet for inch.
That would reduce the surface of the pipe´s circle to 1/144.
With 70,000 psi (pressure from core minus ocean head ?)
and only 800 to of oil spill now, it can certainly not be 5 feet wide.
I don´t think we have the technology to drill 1,5 km deep with
a 5 feet wide drill.
You dont drill a hole 1.5 km deep with equilateral width running its entire length. The width is staggered. Wide at the opening narrowing down in stages to the reservoir. 5 feet is not unrealistic.
Is it an exploration or production well that has blown out?
Originally posted by Udo Hohnekamp Lux.
Talking of a 5,000 feet long chain would not imply submarines
but rather surface ships.
Originally posted by N.of norml
I did not read all 14 pages of this thread so if this has been said already delete.
All this will take is to maneuver a deep well exploratory ship to the site and side hole the well. A new well head is established and the old is pumped full of concrete. At least that is how nearly all well head failures are handled. I guess the main thing is to put down equipment that will handle the pressures involved.
A BOV that will handle 70000psi may require some new tech. But capping a sidehole with an unbroken well head is much more possible than closing a broken pipe.
N.
Originally posted by believer81
Some of you hippies need to grow up and educate yourselves. If it wasn't for petroleum products you'd all still be living in caves. Maybe wood huts if you're lucky.
Society needs oil and oil producers so get over it.
[edit on 3/5/2010 by believer81]
Imagine a pipe 5 feet wide spewing crude oil like a fire hose from what could be the planets' largest, high-pressure oil and gas reserve. With the best technology available to man, the Deepwater Horizon rig popped a hole into that reserve and was overwhelmed. If this isn't contained, it could poison all the oceans of the world.
(13993085.6 lbs) enough for the 5 inch hole, but not the 5 ft hole