It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by 911stinks
Uh...you do realize that chemtrails are sprayed over major cities and not the oceans, correct?! There's a bit more than just silver in chemtrails, anyways. So this would be unintended consequences?
Again, I'll state that the acidification of the oceans has been going on far longer than chemtrails have been in existence. How do you account for this
Ocean Acidification
[edit on 29-4-2010 by unityemissions]
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by 911stinks
Perhaps chemtrail operations are increasing the rate of ph change to our waters, but to say that it's only chemtrails is entirely incorrect.
[edit on 29-4-2010 by unityemissions]
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by 911stinks
Interesting thoughts. What makes you think the technology for oil devouring nanobots is already here? I'm aware that such tech is talked about in the Navy 2025 projections, and that black ops is usually at least 8-10 years ahead of what's known, but this doesn't mean that the tech is here just yet, or that they'd blow the cover right here and now.
The new oil cleanup solution uses patented Self-Assembled Monolayer (SAMs) technology.
The marriage of nanoparticulates and SAMs provides direct access to a new class of nanostructured hybrid materials that are very useful as environmental sorbent materials
Inherent in the usefulness of the SAMs system is the ability to form chemical foundations from which other building blocks can be used to form more complex structures. It has been shown that by designing the interfacial chemistry that is capable of being engaged with specific polymer systems, a designed interface can enhance the adhesion properties of a polymer to a solid substrate. The same foundation can be laid with a specific chemical foundation for chemical anchoring or polymer cross-linking initialization
Originally posted by jazz10
So what effect would the oil have on the ph levels of the water?
would they go up or down?
Originally posted by freemasonsareevil
I really am interested in what caused the initial explosion. Was it some misguided environmentalist? Or was it equipment failure?
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by 911stinks
I must admit that the theory is fun to think about, but also must ask. Is there any evidence you have for this to be true, besides saying that the lord has told you so? As far as I can tell, you have put together nothing more than theory, yet you choose to proclaim this as absolute fact. It would be nice if you could provide any data to back up the claim that chemtrails contain nanobots which will link up to SAM's in the near future, creating genocide
Originally posted by 911stinks
This rig was purposefully sunk, so that what caused the explosion will
never be known, or at least in this decade.
Oil rigs are built in compartments, so the they float even if they take on a lot of water. The fact that it sank, shows there is much more to this than being told.
Originally posted by 911stinks
I will let the news over the next week prove my claims.
Originally posted by Blanca Rose
Originally posted by 911stinks
This rig was purposefully sunk, so that what caused the explosion will
never be known, or at least in this decade.
Ya know, I am really pissed at this comment. You have NO...NONE...NADA proof of this, and it is insutling to those who worked on the rig, and for the family members who lost loved ones there. It could have been an equipment malfunction, or human error, coupled by the fact that the rig is destroyed, and in the middle of the ocean is the reason a cause will take a long time to determine. YOU, know absolutely nothing, and are insensative!
Oil rigs are built in compartments, so the they float even if they take on a lot of water. The fact that it sank, shows there is much more to this than being told.
I have a relative on a rig right now. They are not all completely compartmentalized. They are platforms that have all sorts of buildings on them to house and feed the people working there, like a floating city. You are spewing misinformation!
Originally posted by Blanca Rose
Originally posted by 911stinks
I will let the news over the next week prove my claims.
Yeah, good luck with that! Just what the news needs!
Why don't you go to the news right now? Waiting to see if your out there ideas are accepted by ATS, first?
Tell you what, pal, how do you know that the "news," isn't already aware of you, and what you are typing?
Do you think the news would even touch your crazy prognostications?
Originally posted by Blanca Rose
Originally posted by 911stinks
This rig was purposefully sunk, so that what caused the explosion will
never be known, or at least in this decade.
Ya know, I am really pissed at this comment. You have NO...NONE...NADA proof of this, and it is insutling to those who worked on the rig, and for the family members who lost loved ones there. It could have been an equipment malfunction, or human error, coupled by the fact that the rig is destroyed, and in the middle of the ocean is the reason a cause will take a long time to determine. YOU, know absolutely nothing, and are insensative!
I dont think he was being Crass..the point he was making that the initial fire was not enough to sink the rig.i have family that work on rigs and they also said it was funny the rig sank
Oil rigs are built in compartments, so the they float even if they take on a lot of water. The fact that it sank, shows there is much more to this than being told.
I have a relative on a rig right now. They are not all completely compartmentalized. They are platforms that have all sorts of buildings on them to house and feed the people working there, like a floating city. You are spewing misinformation!
Each leg is also sub-divided along its length into compartments a third of the way from each end which act as independent water-tight compartments.
Originally posted by 911stinks
Read up on the construction.
I'm not saying the oil rig workers sunk the rig. It was most likely done by special ops setting underwater charges.
The last unsinkable rig sunk, so they were supposed to design this latest and greatest rig to be basically, unsinkable. These things are supposed to be hard to sink.
You should ask your relative about that. 11 people died. I'm here to show how the truth is being hidden.
Hell, they didn't even know there was a leak, in the beginning. They've been lying all along, What makes you think they give a damn about the platform employees?
Originally posted by 911stinks
Judging from your vitriol, I would suggest you have something to hide, and I hit the nail on the head.
Originally posted by 911stinks
One thing I see happening. They are bringing in the military. It would probably be UK or UN military, so what I see is a huge military force amassing off our Southern coast. Set fire to the oil, and you have the perfect smoke screen for a full scale attack.
Well, this is a conspiracy forum, is it not?