It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Belgium Triangle

page: 1
5
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 5 2004 @ 07:18 PM
link   
Does anyone remember this story?
It caught my attention many years ago and i've allways wondered about it.

I decided to look into it again and came across some interesting reports, including this one

www.worldofthestrange.com...



posted on Jun, 5 2004 @ 09:08 PM
link   



posted on Jun, 14 2004 @ 06:59 AM
link   
DAMN, I was about to post a new topic about this stuff, when I found this one here... I saw EXACTLY the same thing last summer, in Italy near my hometown, there was these tre stars directly above me and - I don't really know why - but I started concentrating on them, noting that there was really nothing around or in between them and then....they just took off ever so slightly. It was really weird, but I never really thought much about it until a very close friend of mine a few months later mentioned he saw it too and then we began some researches on the internet and found about 5 other people saying they saw it in different places of the world and those two videos.....the only difference between what I saw and those two videos is that to both my friend and I those things/that thing looked pretty close to land... I also thought they were satellites, but I never found any info on THREE satellites forming a PERFECT triangle moving WITHOUT modifying their distance and in such a "perfect" way....god....

Also, here's a longer version of the video that was linked in the above post, it was shown on the most important national channel here in italy, If anyone asks, I'm willing to translate what they say, so let me know.

Ufo In Belgium - Longer version

[edit on 14/6/2004 by k33l]



posted on Jun, 14 2004 @ 09:50 AM
link   
Here is an article which appeared in the French press about the ufos in Belgium:
Perry Match Article

It was viewed from the ground. It was viewed from the air by military pilots. It was picked up on ground radar, and by the pilots radar. Leo Delcroix, Belgian Defense Minister at that time, stated that they have no idea what it could have been, but that it was definitely real and not secret American aircraft. What more evidence is needed?

The case is just forgotten, or maybe casually mentioned on a discussion forum. The skeptics and debunkers never came up with any explanation.

By the way: have you noticed that in the Mexican military ufo video there are also groups of three lights moving together in a fixed fashion?

[edit on 14-6-2004 by gzhpcu]



posted on Jun, 14 2004 @ 11:29 AM
link   
I think what you have is video of the US tr3b, check out the link-very cool stuff.


TR3B

Mecury based plasma at 250,000 atmospheres wild stuff.

[edit on 16-6-2004 by mrmonsoon]



posted on Jun, 14 2004 @ 12:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by gzhpcu What more evidence is needed?


Agreed.

The case is just forgotten, or maybe casually mentioned on a discussion forum. The skeptics and debunkers never came up with any explanation.

[edit on 14-6-2004 by gzhpcu]

I'm surprised they didn't make up some rubbish about it being a weather balloon or ball lightning hehe

[edit on 14-6-2004 by Deimos]



posted on Jun, 14 2004 @ 11:31 PM
link   
Pretty simple on this I think: either advanced US/NATO craft or aliens. Funny how this story just kind of exists yet it doesn't really go anywhere...nobody really has kept pushing this. I have a feeling the Mexico case is going to do the same thing. Nobody will really have an answer and skeptics will discount it or just say "not good enough".

All of the very interesting UFO stories seem to follow this pattern where everyone gets excited, scientists say well maybe it was this, the military shuts up and then it just kind of dies. Did anyone go to the UN after the Belgium sighting and say "hey USA did you do this and would you knock it off?" Has anyone challenged the US on this or any other country, including China and say hey did you do this? If they say no then shouldn't we pose the question of so if you didn't do it...don't you think we better find out who did?

Rendleshem, Kecksburg, New Mexico state patrol ufo physical evidence, a playground full of kids in Zimbabwe all seeing the same saucer and occupant, Belgium, Russia, Malstrom USAF warhead sighting/activation....it goes on and on and nobody really just puts it all together and shakes the world with it.

I think only a Steven Spielberg documentary revelation film is ever going to convince people that something is up. Movies have an amazing impact on our world culture and having people sit through a 3 hour movie showing all the facts in an entertaining way may be the answer.



posted on Jun, 15 2004 @ 12:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by Boogie
(...)
Did anyone go to the UN after the Belgium sighting and say "hey USA did you do this and would you knock it off?" Has anyone challenged the US on this or any other country, including China and say hey did you do this? If they say no then shouldn't we pose the question of so if you didn't do it...don't you think we better find out who did?
(...)


Actually nearly that: the Belgian government has official confirmation from US and also from several other european countries that they did not send anything of their own over Belgium. More than that, several other governments were deeply interested in the reports, and most of them went public (the official ones, yes!).

Read this thread, and this one for more info.

A lot of stuff is available on the net. It is officially a UFO. And it is officially no plane or drone or balloon, according to most earth countries. So...? More proof needed?



posted on Jun, 15 2004 @ 07:56 AM
link   
It was pretty much incredible to me when I realized other people had seen what I saw. I just keep watching those videos and I keep wishing I had a camera when I saw that stuff. I've been keeping a look out to the skyes since then.



posted on Jun, 15 2004 @ 12:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by SpookyVince

Originally posted by Boogie
(...)
Did anyone go to the UN after the Belgium sighting and say "hey USA did you do this and would you knock it off?" Has anyone challenged the US on this or any other country, including China and say hey did you do this? If they say no then shouldn't we pose the question of so if you didn't do it...don't you think we better find out who did?
(...)


Actually nearly that: the Belgian government has official confirmation

from US and also from several other european countries that they did not send anything of their own over Belgium. More than that, several other governments were deeply interested in the reports, and most of them went public (the official ones, yes!).

Read this thread, and this one for more info.

A lot of stuff is available on the net. It is officially a UFO. And it is officially no plane or drone or balloon, according to most earth countries. So...? More proof needed?


Just a thought-Your the US government, you have a bleeding edge craft/technology that no one esle has. You fly it around the world-tests and other reasons. When people see it, you deny it's existance (gee, thats new for secret military equipment) and say it's a ufo. Now when it is seen, it is always credited as being a ufo. I strongly incurage all to read the link I posted.



posted on Jun, 15 2004 @ 12:40 PM
link   
monsoon,

One problem with that is that there have been sightings of those trianlges since the 60's. I doubt the U.S. had TR-3b's by then already...

keyholepublishing.com...



posted on Jun, 15 2004 @ 01:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by k33l
I also thought they were satellites, but I never found any info on THREE satellites forming a PERFECT triangle moving WITHOUT modifying their distance and in such a "perfect" way....god....

[edit on 14/6/2004 by k33l]


I have heard of some satellites that travel in perfect triangles- it was in a post here i think they might be these NOSS ones, but i do remember that they had a polar orbit and were used for spying.



posted on Jun, 15 2004 @ 01:38 PM
link   
Here is the info on triangular satellite formations : Link

They were the one i thought they were.



posted on Jun, 15 2004 @ 07:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheBandit795
monsoon,

One problem with that is that there have been sightings of those trianlges since the 60's. I doubt the U.S. had TR-3b's by then already...

keyholepublishing.com...


The difference is that the 's ones had sharp edges, the tr3b has rounded cornors-like the picture, if you examine it closey.



posted on Jun, 15 2004 @ 07:51 PM
link   
read the aurora aircraft project debunked as an avro vulcan and it was debunked before



posted on Jun, 16 2004 @ 10:31 AM
link   
See for yourself:



Belgian Triangle



Avro Vulcan

Can an Avro Vulcan be practically silent while in flight?
And can an Avro Vulcan do this???


This object could fly as slow as 30 mph, but it accelerated to incredible speeds. Witnesses were adamant that no plane belonging to any air force could have caught this object. Indeed, that night the Belgian Air Force sent two F-16s to do exactly that. The triangles were captured on several NATO radar stations; the jet pilots could also track the objects on radar, and even see them � at times.

But the F-16s � the top interceptors in the world � were completely outclassed by the triangular craft. Not only could it accelerate at incredible speeds, not only could it stop on a dime, but it could change its altitude almost instantly. At one point, for example, radar installations and amazed witnesses observed the triangle to drop about 4,000 feet in one second. That�s nearly a mile.


Sorry, this has not been debunked as an Avro Vulcan...

[edit on 16-6-2004 by TheBandit795]



posted on Jun, 16 2004 @ 12:55 PM
link   
all that is garbage we ran an IR scan and it is using conventional jet engines, and if you look the lighting at the tip is what covers the neck it is sorry to say a vulcan.



posted on Jun, 16 2004 @ 01:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by machinegunjordan
all that is garbage we ran an IR scan and it is using conventional jet engines, and if you look the lighting at the tip is what covers the neck it is sorry to say a vulcan.

....lol....sure it is.



posted on Jun, 16 2004 @ 01:11 PM
link   
buddy you have been here a month today me i have been here 3 months and lurked for 4 or 5 so i know what i am saying.



posted on Jun, 16 2004 @ 01:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by machinegunjordan
all that is garbage we ran an IR scan and it is using conventional jet engines, and if you look the lighting at the tip is what covers the neck it is sorry to say a vulcan.


How are you so sure it's garbage? Thousands of people have seen the UFO making those maneuvers, f-16's can surely intercept an avro vulcan, which hada top speed of 640mph. Why weren't they able to intercept the UFO?

You're dismissing all of those accounts too prematurely. And the two pictures don't resemble each other at all...




top topics



 
5
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join