It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SuperTripps
reply to post by mick1423
this is what i also see.all over important archicteture in 8-12 legged circular romanesque or templar structures
Originally posted by mick1423
reply to post by SuperTripps
Originally posted by SuperTripps
reply to post by mick1423
this is what i also see.all over important archicteture in 8-12 legged circular romanesque or templar structures
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/52b13a404a03.jpg[/atsimg]
SuperTripps, you really found something important i think
At first i remembered Proto's post about a concil of less then 12 men at the top of the Roman Empire but it seams that it's sometimes 8 or 12 legs so then it make me think....the fasces Legs are definitely representing Rome as TPTB that control the world but the number of legs could be the Roman Legion's titles (#).
A 8 legs architecture with the Roman Statue makes 9 ...representing a member or Leader of the 9th Legion and a 12 legs architecture, with the Roman Statue makes 13, representing a member or Leader of the 13th Legion of the Roman Empire....The Roman Empire is the Great Architect of the World, controlling and designing the world with his Legions using the power of propaganda and money...
exactly, there it is in plane view on vatican and white house again. 8-12 legs
and your hypothesis to compare this to the legions is like AMAZING
i remember loving the Series ROME on HBO a few years ago. then i see proto dude link it all in. he he
i still think its very feasible for at least one entity could have split at least mentally over time to build it self up or forces within it that actively fight ROME. its almost too perfect to think all roads lead to one place
the council of 8 stuff still freaking with my head
edit on 24-8-2011 by mick1423 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by xuenchen
Originally posted by Gexi13
And who owns the vatican?
The Vatican is a corporation like most nations and big companies.
the "owners" are the stockholders.
TPTB are the stockholders.
no one knows for sure WHO they are except themselves.
any large holding tank with large assets are the likely suspects.
many international corporations and nations all own stock in each other.
the most powerful are the ones with the most valuable resources at any given time in history, all subject to change as events dictate.
...like oil, food resources, industrial populations, etc.
as has been posted before, the 3 major "visible" institutions are:
The Vatican, City of London, and Washington D.C.
all 3 are independent city-states not directly "governed" by any nation.
that's because they are headquarters for the "governing" nations and smaller international corporations !
The Rothschild family controls all the money and holdings for the Vatican directly, and for most nations through the central banking systems worldwide.
The Rothschild "family" is large as is the Vatican "family".
we could ask the same question (on a smaller scale) for General Motors ?
The entire concept grew from the ancient merchant/trade commerce groups.
They have been "in business" for many thousands of years.
Names and methods have changed hundreds of times.
very deep and complicated subject.
in short, the corporations are formed with longevity in mind.
thats how they keep the assets in the controlling families for generations.
some info links:
www.peoplesconference.org...
jubilee2012.50webs.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.bis.org...
Google Video Link |
As I reviewed all the evidence, including Caesar’s medical history, a suspicion began to form. Might Caesar, driven by narcissistic concern for his own image and dignity, have engineered his own death? Might a man who had risen to become the most powerful ruler in his world have found it deeply humiliating to lose control of both his sense of continuity in space and time and his body in public? It is reasonable to infer that Caesar would have found it far more painful to be perceived as pitiable and incontinent than haughty and rude. The life choices he faced might have struck him as especially stark: old age and increasing fits, temporal lobe–influenced loss of memory, and even public diarrhea—or a dramatic exit worthy of the most powerful dictator the world had ever known.
Suicide by Cop?
I next raised the question of whether Caesar’s public murder was not simply a narcissist’s suicide, but also a consciously chosen strategic act designed to ensure his succession. One classical historian on our team has argued that Caesar effectively handed the conspirators a deadline when he announced his impending departure for war with Parthia. Garofano noted that Caesar secretly changed his will to name his successor six months before his death—and he left every citizen enough money to live on for three months, guaranteeing a groundswell of mourning and adulation. It does not seem farfetched to interpret these events not as the acts of a man blinded to his vulnerability by his own arrogance, but as the careful orchestrations of someone who, in writing about his life, clearly craved historical immortality.
It is one hypothesis but no more than that; I used forensic neuropsychiatry and psychoanalytically informed decision analysis as ways to open other paths of inquiry, rather than to come to a definitive conclusion. As a working psychoanalyst, I exercise curiosity in the most private of settings about an analysand’s received truths and accepted “absolute” wisdom, to help free the analysand to ask previously unthinkable questions. As a forensic psychiatrist, I work on interdisciplinary teams to explore potential translations between the clinical world of meaning and the legal world of objectivity, to understand the choices people make when faced with ambiguity or adversity.
While the circumstances of Caesar’s death must remain shrouded in speculation, the aftermath clearly dovetailed with his enormous ambitions. Within a few years, every one of the conspirators would be dead, some by their own hands. The Roman Republic, which the killers had ostensibly hoped to preserve, effectively ended with Caesar’s murder. Power passed quickly from the dead dictator to his handpicked successor. Caesar’s grand-nephew Octavius was only 19 at the time of his uncle’s assassination, but as the chief heir to Caesar’s tremendous fortune and powerful family name, he commanded the loyalty of the Roman middle and lower classes outraged by the murder of their champion. He would become Rome’s first emperor, known as Caesar Augustus.
Two years later, his dead uncle would be formally deified as “the Divine Julius,” and Caesar Augustus would take the title of “Son of God.” Every Roman emperor who followed Augustus also adopted Caesar as part of his name until the reign of Hadrian, who designated Caesar as the title of the heir apparent; the imperial use of Caesar would reverberate many centuries after Julius Caesar’s death with the German Kaiser and the Russian czar, cementing a legacy of immortality that perhaps even Caesar himself couldn’t have imagined. But, then again, Caesar had always gotten everything he wanted in life. Why not also in death?