It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by unityemissions
I don't think there's anything to the indigo children, bs.
Just look to it's origins. Someone who wanted to make bank off a new concept. She coined it, created a book, and the fad took off.
Originally posted by unityemissions
There's really nothing scientific about this. Has anyone ever proved that a supposed indigo will always present a blue/purple "aura" from krilian photography?
Originally posted by unityemissions
Why? Because the heat signature is constantly fluctuating.
Originally posted by unityemissions
Debunked. Really not difficult, guys. ... No hocus pocus necessary.
Originally posted by quango
I see a lot of hate directed towards Indigos on ATS , and although those who claim to be such often don't do themselves any favors in the manner in which they present themselves, I don't really understand where the hate comes from. Shouldn't people have the right to believe whatever they'd like?
OP, I'm not referring to your thread here, but aren't these rather pointless and mean-spirited attacks that Indigos (as well as Christians, UFO believers, or any of the other countless groups of people online and off) endure more divisive than the beliefs themselves?
Originally posted by NephraTari
reply to post by tothetenthpower
Its not about the label. its about debating their existence which is what you are doing here. I can't understand how you can call your child indigo and then insist that they don't exist all in the same thread.
It's as contradicting as the bible.
Thou shalt not kill.. unless it is a sacrifice to god.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
Originally posted by PapaKrok
I don't think Humans NEED to evolve, let alone ever will. We are perfect machines. The meat suit you are in that is. Your mind is all that can evolve, and even then you're not "evolving" your just learning how to use more of it at the same time.
Really? We are constantly evolving...getting bigger, fatter, stronger, smarter... natural selection, genetic mutation...our entire immune system, our ability to adapt to a rapidly changing environment, the ability to keep up with rapid changes in technology, all of these are mechanisms of evolution and mutation. We are at a point, as a species, where evolution will become increasingly willful and will be a function of choice through the selective application of technology.
The human body is perfect? I'm not even gonna touch that one. No sense in poking a creationist with a stick. Faith, it seems, is conveniently ignorant of fact and evidence based proof.
I"m not a creationist, don't worry.
And no, mixing technology with the human body is NOT evolution. That's innovation and invention.
You'd think if we needed to evolve we'd have done some in the past 200 thousand years. No so much apparently.
Sure there's genetics and mutations and errors that occur, but I don't see anybody growing a third arm, or millions being born with webbed feet or something of that nature.
BTW, we aren't getting faster, smarter. We sure are getting fatter and more ignorant because we willfully POISON ourselves, mind, body and soul.
There's no denying that.
We are not in harmony with nature, our spirits or even our fellow brethren, therefore IMO you can only move backwards in that way.
~Keeper
Originally posted by harpsounds
I kind of agree I think.
We see it also with ADD/the broadening of the autism spectrum diagnoses, and things like that. If a child isn't seen as 'normal', then people need some reason, or label to make them feel they understand it.
I think in a way, we've become less tolerant, and our view of what is 'normal' has been narrowed.
It reminds me a bit of some conspiracy thinking, it seems we humans have some kind of inbuilt need for an answer to every question. Sometimes those answers may be correct, but it's probably more about filling that gap and at least being able to offer some reason.
Wikipedia says they are... you guessed it... psychic New Age kids with dark blue auras... the very misinformation that we have been trying to correct in mass media for a decade.
The Indigo Children are a main-stream issue. They were named by a woman (Nancy Tappe) who is a synesthete (one who has synethesia), and not by a psychic who saw an aura. In fact, auras have nothing whatsoever to do with Indigo Children. We believe these children are the beginning of a new consciousness, an actual change in Human nature, and many around the world are also seeing it. Educators, day-care workers, and parents are all stepping up to the plate to become advocates of this phenomenon. In the last 10 years, the Indigo Books have sold almost one million copies in 24 languages... humanity is obviously relating to this issue in very large numbers.