It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
Originally posted by Zeus2573
FACT: Lens flares DO NOT show up on negatives!
You have got to be kidding! You just failed Photography 101.
If your going to rant, at least be partially right.
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by Zeus2573
Except Sitchin does play a major role in this. He is the origin of the theory and seeing as how his claims are refuted by experts in the fields he uses, it would mean his theory is wrong. You say you've seen it and I believe that you believe that to be true. However, if you had never read Sitchin would you think that what you were seeing was a massive planet destroying planet/star or that it was an optical illusion of some kind?
Originally posted by Zeus2573
[. Everyone is always saying he wasn't qualified to translate Sumerian text. In my opinion he is the only one that is qualified to translate Sumerian text. He has put more research into it than anyone else on this Planet.(as far as I know) Actually, Sumerian text was uncommon until Sitchin came along, and yet people are still to this day saying that he was unqualified.
"Sedna shouldn't be there," said Brown. "There's no way to put Sedna where it is. It never comes close enough to be affected by the Sun, but it never goes far enough away from the Sun to be affected by other stars."
Perhaps a massive unseen object is responsible for Sedna's mystifying orbit, its gravitational influence keeping Sedna fixed in that far-distant portion of space.
Astronomers believe it is of a type called a red or brown dwarf – a "failed star" that has not managed to generate enough energy to burn like the Sun.
But it should be detectable by a heat-sensitive space telescope called WISE, the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer.
Launched last year, WISE began surveying the skies in January. It is expected to discover a 1000 brown dwarfs within 25 light-years of the Sun – right on our cosmic doorstep – before its coolant runs out in October.
Originally posted by stereologist
To claim that a planet made of shiny gold, therefore a high albedo, can be in the solar system without anyone noticing is well a bit on the unbelievable.
Originally posted by stereologist
Tayesin and patmac, the problem is that the evidence is rather lacking or made up such as the claims of Sitchin's arrest and trial.
Originally posted by stereologist
Don't forget that the planets Neptune and Uranus were found because they were predicted to exist and found close to their predicted positions. The predictions were based on the observations of the movements of the known planets in the solar system. Yet, here you'd like us to believe that here is an object that has an unstable orbit and large mass that orbits in a stable manner and has no noticeable effect on the other planets and cannot be seen although much smaller objects with less albedo are tracked.
For me there is a possibility, however slight it may seem, that there is another member to our Solar System with an extended orbit as described. And while I do not "Believe" in Nibiru, I think there is a chance it may exist, given much of the sound scientific information left to us in those Sumerian Tablets.
Originally posted by stereologist
Thanks Tayesin. I was responding to what was posted in this thread.