It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PACRIM
I believe the catalyst for the military joining after a meeting with the Joint Chiefs, is the treaties that were to be signed by Obama in April. They didn't want the UN occupying sovereign territory and have to fight them later to remove them.
Originally posted by Libertygal
reply to post by XPLodER
Ok. You go to buy a house. You pay no money down, pay the closing costs. You sign a contract based on the assessed value of the property and the home that exists on it. You move in.
In this contract, you agree to pay interest, insurance on the property, and taxes on said property.
You stop paying.
You get foreclosed.
This is in the agreement you signed.
It is not only a legal binding contract, but if you are a decent person, a morally binding one, as well. During said negotiations, you agree, smile, shake hands, celebrate the closing, even have a housewarming party.
Like it or not, and we can use whatever terms you wish, you *owe* someone for the value of what you have in your possession. Of *course* you are a tenant on your "own" property! If you have not paid it off, you don't own anything except perhaps a "stake" in said property!
You agree to allow the property to be held by the loan holder as collateral for the loan. Without said collateral, they have nothing to regain if you default on the contract.
Morally and legally, you have a duty to pay those payments, and do not get the title to that property until you complete the contract or renegotiate it otherwise.
Otherwise, what gives you any right to lay any claim to said property? It's called making good on your debt.
If you don't like the deal, don't sign the contract! No one made you do it, no one twisted your arm or held a gun to your head.
Proposing things like going to foreclosure and hoping they lost your contract are immoral, and a breach of said contract.
If you do not like the contract, pay cash or take a hike.
To propose anything else is to propose that you should try to get something for nothing. That's dirty, IMO.
Any deal where you get something for nothing allows the original owner to hold the ownership of said thing until it is paid off, then to turn ownership over to you. Take a car title.
It all works the same. They just found a loophole to allow *some* people to perhaps get away with it. But, it doesn't work for everyone.
You will still lose the property even if you succeed with the mortgage scam, if you fail to pay the property taxes.
Followers of this type of movement often times find themselves in very deep legal troubles, lose their homes, their personal properties, and often times end up being paper tigers, filing relentless and never ending suits against the government that get dismissed and thrown out.
If people do not like the way things are when they owe debt, then they should pay cash for their items, and not enter into any legally binding contracts. Finding ways to use loopholes to steal, well, you take that how you will.
One greed is no better than another. One's personal greed is not any better than the perceived government greed.
I am not going to attempt to dissect and argue the legalities, because I am not a lawyer, not going to try to pretent to be one like some of these people, but I can tell you I am a morally sound individual, and I can look in the mirror and be proud to be who I am, my dislike of the legal system notwithstanding.
I also do not have to make fake names to hide behind. I am proud to be who I am, and proud to own what I do, and I will be more proud to complete my legally and morally binding contracts of home ownership the day I pay my final payment and hold my deed in my hand, and this little parcel of land and the wood and concrete upon it because I *earned it*, not because some fraudster taught me ways to skirt the law, and basically steal.
Can't you see this as being a part of the problem, as opposed to being the sollution?
Originally posted by XPLodER
reply to post by PACRIM
i think if libertygal watches the vid she will
understand and get angry with the true state of things (as i did)
or beleive what she did before and deny any truth presented
personally that link from hawk gave me shivers
again hawk supplied my eye opening with this link
www.tpuc.org...
thanks hawk for the link
Originally posted by theyreadmymind
Originally posted by Caulfield
reply to post by infinite
Exactly, I wrote about that earlier, it was just registered in Feb. this year, and only for a year, yes , I do find this as odd, especially because if these are real patriots, who are really concerned, their site should have gone up long before now. A lot of folks like myself are concerned about issues such as socialism, but this issue started long before now, just consider "Social" Security. I appreciate your feedback, I am interested in what others have to think, its an American right to Think and Speak what you want.
Would it make any difference to you guys that they had to "rush" forward with this plan because they believe they were preventing World War III? They had to get all these Grand Juries together and go forward with their plans in a matter of weeks.
BTW, I'm not saying I agree with them or know where they got this information. But that could very well be why they had to register their domain in February of this year and go forward with the plan so quickly.
Originally posted by XPLodER
reply to post by Libertygal
i am impressed with your view point and wish for you to do one thing before besmurchin my moral standing or lack of ethics
please understand this morgage GAME is stacked against you from BIRTH
please reveiw this vid as a way to veiw THE OTHER SIDE of this discusion
as i would have said the same thing if hawk had not shown me
if after reveiwing the vid you would like me to eat my words i WILL
You are always welcome to pay on whatever you want. Nobody will stop you. The point you missed was the use of your birth as an investment tool for the corporation. You were sold into slavery at birth.
My wife has been part of the disillusioned few who have fallen prey to the Sam Kennedy scam. She has been kicked out of her home, lost custody of her kids, gone to jail and been convicted of a felony, lost her career as a pre-school teacher after months of filling frivilous documents provided by these perpetuators(in exchange for strings of fees ofcourse)and crazy enough she still follow these group of scam artist religiously
What I am concerned about is that they did not win. I have heard that several people attempting to use his processes are in jail, which is now why he says his show is for entertainment purposes only. This really concerns me for why would I want to use a product which the seller of (Kennedy) can not endorse. If you were facing a civil or criminal lawsuit, would you take the advice of an attorney which he qualifed with "my advice is for entertainment purposes only'? That what it sounds like coming from Kenney.
By the way, if you still remember Elaine Brown, the lady dentist who is married to Ed Brown, both who are in federal prision for failing to file income tax returns, she appears to be using Mr. Kennedy's 1099-OID approach to pay off some court costs. The link listed below is from the Clerk of the Federal Court - you can read the letter but I do not think the federal clerk is impressed a bit by this approach. In fact, if I understand correctly, she could and may get another 5 years in prision and at least a $10,000 fine. This seems to be a good "test" if Mr. Kennedy's OID process works. Lets see if someone can produce any verifiable evidence that the feds run away from this issue with Elaine Brown. I thnik she has gotten some very bad advice and may never see the light of day again.
Originally posted by PACRIM
I believe the catalyst for the military joining after a meeting with the Joint Chiefs, is the treaties that were to be signed by Obama in April. They didn't want the UN occupying sovereign territory and have to fight them later to remove them.
Originally posted by PACRIM
Apparently there is evidence of high crimes and treason involving several countries. It involves the systematic theft of wealth and using fraudulent documents.
Originally posted by infinite
theplanet.com, the other hosting site located on libertyforlife, coppercards, etc can be traced back to;
1 1 2 * 1.3 ms
70.86.70.33 AS21844
THEPLANET-AS 21.46.5646.static.theplanet.com. 255 US Unknown: 82319f74
2 95 43 * 1.3 ms [+0ms]
70.87.254.25 AS21844
THEPLANET-AS po104.dsr01.dllstx5.theplanet.com. 0 miles [+0] 254 US Unix: 10:22:44.953
3 4 1 * 1.3 ms [+0ms]
70.85.127.105 AS21844
THEPLANET-AS po51.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com. -1 miles [+0] 0 miles [+0] 250 US Unix: 10:22:44.940
4 1 1 * 1.3 ms [+0ms]
70.87.255.37 AS21844
THEPLANET-AS 25.ff.5746.static.theplanet.com.
These three servers are also hosting, NSA.gov. www.gotfr.com... for the record, is only hosted on static.theplanet.com servers.
There was an odd ip that appeared on a few of the locations. Think it might be a direct connection by the NSA, I'm not sure.
[edit on 5-4-2010 by infinite]
Here's a sample:
Time Name (IP)
0.2 `- b.sackett-taggart.la.cyberverse.net (209.151.232.30 [W])
0.3 `- ge-6-23-178.car2.losangeles1.level3.net (4.71.36.225 [W])
0.4 `- ae-92-90.ebr2.losangeles1.level3.net (4.69.144.243 [W])
32.1 `- ae-3-3.ebr3.dallas1.level3.net (4.69.132.78 [W])
32.4 `- ae-24-70.car4.dallas1.level3.net (4.69.145.70 [W])
32.6 `- the-planet.car4.dallas1.level3.net (4.71.122.2 [W])
32.6 `- te7-2.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com (70.87.253.26 [W])
32.7 `- te1-3.dsr02.dllstx2.theplanet.com (70.87.253.122 [W])
33.3 `- te1-2.car06.dllstx6.theplanet.com (70.87.254.182 [W])
33.7 +- gator343.hostgator.com (74.54.128.50 [W])
33.7 | www.libertyforlife.com [Q][A][N][W]
33.7 | away3d.com [Q][A][N][W]
33.7 | www.coyotecom.com [Q][A][N][W]
33.7 | www.game-rol.com [Q][A][N][W]
33.7 www.gotfr.org [Q][A][N][W]