It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So opposition and disagreement is petty now?
You must buy a policy that covers ambulatory patient services, emergency services, hospitalization, maternity and newborn care, mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioral health treatment; prescription drugs; rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices; laboratory services; preventive and wellness services; chronic disease management; and pediatric services, including oral and vision care.
You’re a single guy without children? Tough, your policy must cover pediatric services. You’re a woman who can’t have children? Tough, your policy must cover maternity services. You’re a teetotaler? Tough, your policy must cover substance abuse treatment. (Add your own violation of personal freedom here.) (Section 1302).
If you are a physician and you don’t want the government looking over your shoulder? Tough. The Secretary of Health and Human Services is authorized to use your claims data to issue you reports that measure the resources you use, provide information on the quality of care you provide, and compare the resources you use to those used by other physicians. Of course, this will all be just for informational purposes. It’s not like the government will ever use it to intervene in your practice and patients’ care. Of course not. (Section 3003 (i))
If you go for cosmetic surgery, you will pay an additional 5% tax on the cost of the procedure. Think you know how to spend that money you earned better than the government? Tough. (Section 9017).
You are young and healthy and want to pay for insurance that reflects that status? Tough. You’ll have to pay for premiums that cover not only you, but also the guy who smokes three packs a day, drink a gallon of whiskey and eats chicken fat off the floor. That’s because insurance companies will no longer be able to underwrite on the basis of a person’s health status. (Section 2701).
Originally posted by jibeho
The Devil is in the details of this atrocity.
Do you call this FREEDOM? I wonder why people are complaining?? This is just the tip of the iceberg. The true details have yet to be revealed to a partially hoodwinked nation.
You must buy a policy that covers ambulatory patient services, emergency services, hospitalization, maternity and newborn care, mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioral health treatment; prescription drugs; rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices; laboratory services; preventive and wellness services; chronic disease management; and pediatric services, including oral and vision care.
You’re a single guy without children? Tough, your policy must cover pediatric services. You’re a woman who can’t have children? Tough, your policy must cover maternity services. You’re a teetotaler? Tough, your policy must cover substance abuse treatment. (Add your own violation of personal freedom here.) (Section 1302).
YOU COULD JUST GET A PRIVATE INSURANCE INSTEAD AND NOT PAY FOR ANY SERVICES YOU DON'T REALLY NEED!! You have more choices now!
If you are a physician and you don’t want the government looking over your shoulder? Tough. The Secretary of Health and Human Services is authorized to use your claims data to issue you reports that measure the resources you use, provide information on the quality of care you provide, and compare the resources you use to those used by other physicians. Of course, this will all be just for informational purposes. It’s not like the government will ever use it to intervene in your practice and patients’ care. Of course not. (Section 3003 (i))
Tougher regulations and control over doctors. That's a GOOD thing for consumers! The government also tests whether your car is fit for the road or not...it's done for our safety so no hillbilly runs his truck with failing breaks into school children.
If you go for cosmetic surgery, you will pay an additional 5% tax on the cost of the procedure. Think you know how to spend that money you earned better than the government? Tough. (Section 9017).
It's COSMETIC surgery. Why would it be fair if your fellow Americans have to pay in full for your boobjob or facelift?? They're unnecessary procedures that aren't going to improve your health.
You are young and healthy and want to pay for insurance that reflects that status? Tough. You’ll have to pay for premiums that cover not only you, but also the guy who smokes three packs a day, drink a gallon of whiskey and eats chicken fat off the floor. That’s because insurance companies will no longer be able to underwrite on the basis of a person’s health status. (Section 2701).
Again, just go with a private insurance and you won't be forced to take the government plan. Plenty of options for people who live healthy and don't get sick that often. No one is FORCING you to go with the government plan!!
blogs.investors.com...
The backfire of this legislation will be enormous. I just wonder what service will be like when doctors begin to hang up their stethoscopes in droves.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by jam321
I only bring in General George because the conservatives seem to be claiming some non-existant moral high ground. I find the entire system corrupted beyond belief, both sides! I think that every politician in DC should be run out of town, and quite a few of them should be arrested and charged with treason (on both sides of the aisle). Obama, Bush, Clinton... etc. etc. etc. All the same in the end, no matter which 'Party' they claimed to be from... Just a dog and pony show for the ignorant masses...
I'm sorry if any of you took the title, or the OP itself personally, but I was pissed, and I'm sick and tired of the partisan bickering here on ATS. If anything, this should be the one place that that doesn't happen. It's hypocracy to be suspicious of your Government, but then loyal to your political party... The latter forms the former...
[edit on 22-3-2010 by JaxonRoberts]
Originally posted by cmaracing
Originally posted by Dock9
For those us of who are not American
would someone kindly explain, in approximate terms is fine, how much this new health care is going to cost the average American
and does it exceed what the average American was paying before ?
please
The same as one stealth bomber to begin with and in the end about 3 stealth bombers, with out cost overrides. Thats the cost of the program in all.
[edit on 22-3-2010 by cmaracing]
[edit on 22-3-2010 by cmaracing]
Originally posted by neolxs
As someone who lives in the UK, I find it hard to understand why America dislikes the health bill so much.
In the UK we have had free healthcare for over 50 years, Its provided to us thorugh our taxes, is the US Healthbill not the same?
Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by MrXYZ
Pull your head out of the sand long enough to see what will happen. The private insurance companies will fold due to skyrocketing premiums caused by Employers dropping private coverage. The bill does not require employers to provide coverage. Employers will drop coverage, pay a meager fine and reap the rewards of this new found savings. The rest of us will be left hanging in the breeze to pay the huge premiums of private coverage or go with the cheap govt. option. We won't have a choice.
The private insurance will never be able to compete with the federal govt.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by MrXYZ
Pull your head out of the sand long enough to see what will happen. The private insurance companies will fold due to skyrocketing premiums caused by Employers dropping private coverage. The bill does not require employers to provide coverage. Employers will drop coverage, pay a meager fine and reap the rewards of this new found savings. The rest of us will be left hanging in the breeze to pay the huge premiums of private coverage or go with the cheap govt. option. We won't have a choice.
The private insurance will never be able to compete with the federal govt.
Employers weren't forced to provide coverage in the past either!! That's not something new that will induce drastic changes. Also, skyrocketing premiums of private insurance companies are economic nonsense. If the government option really is cheaper, they will have to adapt and if anything, cut prices too...or everyone will move to the government option if it's really cheaper.
After the bill is introduced, you will have in fact MORE choices than before, NOT less as you claim. You can chose the government option, or go with private insurance.
Fact is, it puts more control on insurance companies, doctors, and puts downward pressure on premiums since the private insurance companies now have to compete with the government. You claim that'll increase premiums of private insurance companies, that's bollox! If you have a convenience store and your competitor lowers his prices, what's your move? Do you increase prices (as you claim) or lower them? It's a total economic no brainer!
The bill will help a lot of people. It might not be perfect, but it's a good thing for America as a whole...better than the status quo for sure.
The whole "premiums will skyrock" is nothing but a lie.
[edit on 23-3-2010 by MrXYZ]
Originally posted by MrXYZ
The whole "premiums will skyrock" is nothing but a lie.
Originally posted by Nurv47
It's quite simple. Obama ignored the wishes of the majority of the American people
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
Originally posted by Nurv47
It's quite simple. Obama ignored the wishes of the majority of the American people
I keep hearing this TALKING POINT bantied about as some sort of fact without anything backing it up...
First off... the HR passed it with a majority
If you want to say that the states being represented didn't represent a majority of Americans, then I expect that you believe GwB's 2000 election was in error as well?
Funny how something passes with a majority in the PEOPLES HOUSE and yet somehow people still believe that the majority is against this...
*smh*