It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SourGrapes
So, you're actually "ecstatic" about paying for something now, that you won't see a benefit from (if you even get the benefit, or know someone who would) for years from now? Really?
Let's see how "ecstatic" you are around this time, next year.
Actually, with this bill, immediately after it's all passed (no waiting around for 4 years) since I am 24 years old, Im allowed to go back onto my parents insurance till I turn 26. My 'pre existing conditions' wont matter when I get put back on either so yeah, Im ecstatic.
Torron Eeles is a plumber in England who fell down some stairs in December and broke his left arm.
Well, that nifty free health care in England should take care of it. This happened in December. Was the arm repaired in…
A. One day.
B. One week.
C. One month.
D. One year.
The answer is D, maybe. It has been 10 months. The arm still has not been repaired.
The London Daily Mail reported:
Mr Eeles claims his first two operations at the Queen Elizabeth II hospital in Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, were canceled due to a lack of beds and operating time respectively.
His third operation in February was postponed after he was found to have high blood pressure, while the fourth, scheduled for May, was abandoned because of concerns about his smoking.
So, 10 months later, Eeles left arm still dangles uselessly at his side. No one wants a one-armed plumber. So at 50, he is out of work and he could lose his home.
That last item actually makes medical sense. Smoking complicates anesthesia.
Disability?
“Mr. Eeles, from Welham Green, Hertfordshire, applied for employment and support allowance but a doctor ruled he is ineligible for both because he can turn on a tap,” the London Daily Mail also reported.
Originally posted by jam321
How much more in premiums will that cost your parents, or does this legislation prevent the increase of premiums?
Have fun when your insurance premiums go through the roof and when you have to make a choice between paying them, or eating.
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
All you yanks that were whining about the health care bill made me laugh
Finally you catch up to the rest of the world with a health care bill which has worked in many 1st world countries, yet all these fearmongers who dont understand how it works created thread after thread attacking it.
Congratulations USA, you have finally caught up!!!!!
OK, so why exactly do I have to pay for someone who is sick when I am perfectly healthy? Why am I forced to pay for health care when I don't need it?
Originally posted by Conspiracy Pianist
reply to post by truthseeker1984
Have fun when your insurance premiums go through the roof and when you have to make a choice between paying them, or eating.
What makes you think this isn't already the reality for many, many people?
I haven't read the Bill; I don't understand the language used and frankly I don't care. They do whatever they want to do regardless of our opinion, and if they have to fake resistance to make it seem as if everything is contemplated and discussed untill finely polished, they'll just fake some resistance.
"Ooh it was soooo haaard to get this Bill passed, but we FINALLY did it!!!!"
BTW, I haven't been insured for years, and I doubt I can afford it now or in the future, but I won't let this two party charade cloud my judgement - or happiness.
Nothing brings more pain than too much pleasure; nothing more bondage than too much liberty-benjamin franklin
Originally posted by Conspiracy Pianist
reply to post by northexpedition
OK, so why exactly do I have to pay for someone who is sick when I am perfectly healthy? Why am I forced to pay for health care when I don't need it?
Uhm, because you are not Superman and if some drunk hits you at 70mph you will need care?
I don't care for the Government or the insurance corps, but that's just straight up logic.
Originally posted by stephenwephentephen
haha people do get leary for little or no reason, i was just tryna' create a discussion and suddenly i have socialist agenda's, i actually did take into consideration and agree with someone who debunked the bill, i was trying to create a better understanding for myself and others, but yeah well done for getting all heated in here and ruining the good vibe, one things for sure we don't have any charitable folks here! haha
if theres a new way,
i'll be the first in line,
but it better work this time-
megadeth, peace sells
Originally posted by ashanu90
well that just goes to show you american greed triumphs
did you know that when in the early days indians called us 'gringos' because money was our main concern?
You may be wondering why I didn't simply look "gringo" up in a Spanish-English dictionary, since I was so determined to find its definition. Well, I did, and the word was defined as "one who speaks gibberish," and "blonde," neither of which made much sense in the common usage of the word unless you are writing a story about a gibberish-talking fair-haired woman, right?
Now don't get mad at me, all you blondes out there who speak gibberish, I didn't write the dictionary. Anyway, you know me. If it's simple, I'm not interested. Confusion, chaos and complication are my middle names, so I began to search through dusty etymological tomes for an answer.
The word "gringo" was mentioned in Spanish literature as early as the eighteenth century. In his famous Diccionario, compiled prior to 1750, Terreros y Pando, a Spanish historian notes that "gringo" was a nickname given to foreigners in Malaga and Madrid who spoke Spanish with an accent. Maybe it sounded like gibberish.