posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 04:25 PM
I think they did the right thing. They caught him red-handed. They addressed it immediately and decisively. They made sure he was going to remember
the experience, in a negative light. They taught him about repercussions of his actions. AND . . they were kind enough to not call the police, or
get authorities involved.
Just think if they would have kindly pulled him to the side, and told him not to worry and the police would come sort it all out, and they gave him a
drink of water and joked around, and the police came and said "any" shoplifting is a crime, and he went to juvie for the night, and he made some new
juvie friends, and he went to court, and his parents spent a couple of grand to defend him, and the Judge got Child Welfare Services involved, and his
brothers and sisters got taken out of class to be questioned, and community service was ordered, and they accidentally found some porn and gun and ATS
bookmarks on his dad's computer, and they found a homemade knife in the kids room, and God Forbid his mother stored bleach and Ammonia in the same
cabinet, or that Fertilizer and Mower fuel were both in the shed together.
Get it?
Police Involvement = Very Bad, Very Snowbally, Very slippery slope!
Making a lasting impression and teaching about "natural" consequences = Best Option!