Kevin Mcpadden 9/11 First Responder Building 7 Overhears Countdown for Demolition

The author, amongst other things, quite reasonably poses this question :- "if it's so obvious that WTC 7 was demolished, then why are the insurance companies not suing Silverstein for fraud ? "

Thats blatantly obvious; they would have to prove he conspired to be held liable.

Forgive me as I didn't read all 4+ pages as of replies, but I wouldn't be surprised if this guy " falls victim to some freak accident".... or something to the like. Those sorts of things seem to happen sometimes when someone within TPTB wants to shut someone up.

Originally posted by Berserker01
reply to post by TrueAmerican

 

If you say so.

I just said the video was entertaining. BABOOOM!

For your further entertainment, take a listen:

reply to post by TwoPhish


I can hear why some people might initialally hear an Explosive.
But this could be a Elevator Droping, Engine Falling. Something very
large and heavy to say the least.
There is lots of echo happening, You would need the Original Recording
and try to erase all the Echos to see the true Picture. But in doing that
would spoil a perfectly good theory.

Originally posted by skeptic_al
reply to post by TwoPhish

 

I can hear why some people might initialally hear an Explosive.
But this could be a Elevator Droping, Engine Falling. Something very
large and heavy to say the least.
There is lots of echo happening, You would need the Original Recording
and try to erase all the Echos to see the true Picture. But in doing that
would spoil a perfectly good theory.

I respectfully would like to point out that, that was recorded in the afternoon, way after the two towers fell (and their elevators).

Elevators shouldn't have been 'dropping' in WTC 7 now should they have?

I can debate this topic forever. I think I've opened up a few eyes over the last few years so maybe that's all the work I needed to do. I won't nor can convince everyone! We all have our own paths to take.

reply to post by TrueAmerican

Does he seem like another 911 troofer hell bent on destroying the government's story, or is this guy telling the truth?

We cannot offer anything but our opinions about Mr. McPadden story.
Mr. McPadden certainly appears to be credible.
He is only telling us what he has witnessed, and who is to tell us that he is lying? If he is lying, I would like to hear from eyewitness that were there and can prove he is lying, so until we have that, Mr. McPadden story is very credible.




[edit on 21-3-2010 by impressme]

Originally posted by jprophet420

The author, amongst other things, quite reasonably poses this question :- "if it's so obvious that WTC 7 was demolished, then why are the insurance companies not suing Silverstein for fraud ? "

Thats blatantly obvious; they would have to prove he conspired to be held liable.

Usually Firemen, do not carry Explosives to "Pull it"
Pull in fireman terms, really does mean Pull. I've seen this in my City.
They just strap large chains through windows or Pilars and attach it to
some big heavy Machinery. And then "Pull it". This really is the last
resort if it endangers other property or fireman. Even if they chain it ready,
they don't always do it ecause of the risks.

Unless in New York it means, Hey Bob get the C4.

Originally posted by skeptic_al

Originally posted by jprophet420

The author, amongst other things, quite reasonably poses this question :- "if it's so obvious that WTC 7 was demolished, then why are the insurance companies not suing Silverstein for fraud ? "

Thats blatantly obvious; they would have to prove he conspired to be held liable.

Usually Firemen, do not carry Explosives to "Pull it"
Pull in fireman terms, really does mean Pull. I've seen this in my City.
They just strap large chains through windows or Pilars and attach it to
some big heavy Machinery. And then "Pull it". This really is the last
resort if it endangers other property or fireman. Even if they chain it ready,
they don't always do it ecause of the risks.

Unless in New York it means, Hey Bob get the C4.

Well this is very simple.
Can you show those chains straining from upper floors of Building 7 Where were the big PULLING IT machines? Any evidence ?
Do fireman pull buildings with their fire engines?
Ah! the fireman were in the basement of 7 and pulling straight down.
That's why 7 free fell straight down into i's foot print and not all over the streets of NYC.
I thinks it's more like Larry telling Bob to cap the c4. Or simply Pull-It

reply to post by Donny 4 million


But I wasn't suggesting they Pulled the Building Down.
I was explaing what the "Pull it" means to 911 Nutters, It
means Explosives.

Now being Skeptic Al about everything, I'll spot you 10% chance of
it being Explosives. Now will 911 Nutters spot me 10% Chance of NOT
being Explosives. Now from what I know about 911 Nutters, they are
100% sure it was Explosives, they are not even open to any suggestion
of otherwise. Am I Right or Am I Right, Right.

Originally posted by skeptic_al
reply to post by Donny 4 million

 

But I wasn't suggesting they Pulled the Building Down.
I was explaing what the "Pull it" means to 911 Nutters, It
means Explosives.

Now being Skeptic Al about everything, I'll spot you 10% chance of
it being Explosives. Now will 911 Nutters spot me 10% Chance of NOT
being Explosives. Now from what I know about 911 Nutters, they are
100% sure it was Explosives, they are not even open to any suggestion
of otherwise. Am I Right or Am I Right, Right.

Please explain to the membership and myself what a 911 nutter is?
Is that a derogatory label?
Untill I know this I could never be sure about any percentage.

Originally posted by Donny 4 million

Originally posted by skeptic_al
reply to post by Donny 4 million

 

But I wasn't suggesting they Pulled the Building Down.
I was explaing what the "Pull it" means to 911 Nutters, It
means Explosives.

Now being Skeptic Al about everything, I'll spot you 10% chance of
it being Explosives. Now will 911 Nutters spot me 10% Chance of NOT
being Explosives. Now from what I know about 911 Nutters, they are
100% sure it was Explosives, they are not even open to any suggestion
of otherwise. Am I Right or Am I Right, Right.

Please explain to the membership and myself what a 911 nutter is?
Is that a derogatory label?
Untill I know this I could never be sure about any percentage.

A 911 Nutter is anyone that will believe everything they see and read
on the Internet as being gospel. And then Carries on with that Gospel to
everybody they know. It's like a Religeon.

They also go on on about how explosives were used.
But can never supply any logical explantion as to Who, When, How or even Why.
What was the Motive, It was treated like a Crime Scene, so what was the Motive.
It's a bit like somebody killing someone, and saying, That
Person did it, I didn't see it, don't know him, but I know He Did it.

I know your going to point me to slide shows with some Funcky music,
but there is nothing there that I can say beyond a reasonable doubt as
being Accurate and Acceptable as Proof.

And No Evidence is Proof of anything. I Know, Ah-Ha No Proof must be
a cover-up then.

reply to post by skeptic_al


So this is a religious sermon?

Who Bombed The World Trade Center? FBI Bomb Builders Exposed!!
Who Bombed The World Trade Center? FBI Bomb Builders Exposed!! - from the ' Lectric Law Library's stacks.

www.lectlaw.com/files/cur46.htm - Similar

reply to post by skeptic_al


Sorry, I forgot One Thing....

A Full On Nutter:
This is person that leaves a Paid Job so they can take up a permanant
position collecting Unemployment in order to fullfill their ambition of
doing 911 Research, which basically means they use the Internet all day.

Originally posted by Donny 4 million
reply to post by skeptic_al

 

So this is a religious sermon?

Not a sermon, a Religeon.
A religeon is just a belief in something that may or may not have
happened. And it controls their life.

See my previos Post.

Originally posted by skeptic_al
reply to post by skeptic_al

 

Sorry, I forgot One Thing....

A Full On Nutter:
This is person that leaves a Paid Job so they can take up a permanant
position collecting Unemployment in order to fullfill their ambition of
doing 911 Research, which basically means they use the Internet all day.

Could you back this up with some source or something besides personal jaded opinion?
The official story contains no language about NUTTERS.
You are just making that crap up.
Do you know who Barry Jones was?

Originally posted by skeptic_al

Originally posted by Donny 4 million
reply to post by skeptic_al

 

So this is a religious sermon?

Not a sermon, a Religeon.
A religeon is just a belief in something that may or may not have
happened. And it controls their life.

See my previos Post.

The one about the Omission Commission?
Could a nutter think the FBI was involved in the first bombing of the trade towers?

Originally posted by Donny 4 million

Originally posted by skeptic_al
reply to post by skeptic_al

 

Sorry, I forgot One Thing....

A Full On Nutter:
This is person that leaves a Paid Job so they can take up a permanant
position collecting Unemployment in order to fullfill their ambition of
doing 911 Research, which basically means they use the Internet all day.

Could you back this up with some source or something besides personal jaded opinion?
The official story contains no language about NUTTERS.
You are just making that crap up.
Do you know who Barry Jones was?

I noticed in other newsgroups, forums by their own admission and
their Posting Habits with respect to times and Internet Address
that this indeed true. The only time they are not Posting is when they
are asleep.

I know it's not lot of People, but you can find them in the US,UK and
AUS. One guy in AUS, must have half a dozen Aliases and posts several
hundred messages a day accross several boards.

I wonder why we even need to rehash things, Larry Silverstein sat there and said openly that "we decided to pull WTC 7"... if anybody here can put their hand on their heart and believe that with all the debris flying around outside, WTC 1 & 2 crashing to the ground, people jumping put of buildings, etc, etc, that a team of demolition experts could go into WTC & during everything that was happening outside, go about setting up a professional demo plan to implode a 40+ story building within hours of the first plane hi.tting the first tower, what a "crosk" of #. All 3 towers were wired months in advance, all three towers were "pulled" and all the official story is just a joke.

Originally posted by searchforknowledge
I wonder why we even need to rehash things, Larry Silverstein sat there and said openly that "we decided to pull WTC 7"... if anybody here can put their hand on their heart and believe that with all the debris flying around outside, WTC 1 & 2 crashing to the ground, people jumping put of buildings, etc, etc, that a team of demolition experts could go into WTC & during everything that was happening outside, go about setting up a professional demo plan to implode a 40+ story building within hours of the first plane hi.tting the first tower, what a "crosk" of #. All 3 towers were wired months in advance, all three towers were "pulled" and all the official story is just a joke.

If you want to make a point based on a Silverstein quote, you could at least try and get it right.