It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by crusaderiam
That Architect Ron Avery on Youtube did a great job of explaining the structure of the towers and how there is no way planes could have brought it down. I encourage anyone to watch it if you have the time.
Originally posted by hgfbob
Originally posted by jthomas
Originally posted by Crito
Oh, nothing, just a random, everyday explosion. Don't know why the fireman told them to get back because some building in the general vicinity of WTC7 was exploding. Just more people with overactive imaginations I guess.
Actually, as we well know, the area around WTC 7 had been roped off by firemen many hours before the collapse.
No one needed to get "back" since they were already back. So were the firemen themselves. The collapse from the damage was anticipated well in advance which is why the firemen were ordered out of WTC 7 HOURS in advance.
There is no mystery here.
only the mystery of WHO...from the City, communicated to the FDNY that there would be a collapse of 7...
Originally posted by cerberus00
Can we all not agree that this building collapsing is at least strange? It didn't get hit by any planes, and there were just a couple really small fires, so why did it fall?
Hundreds of 4 ton exterior wall sections were hurled in all directions from both towers up to 600 feet away at velocities up to 55 mph.
It takes explosive forces to eject 4 ton and heavier steel pieces sideways at 55 mph.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by crusaderiam
That Architect Ron Avery on Youtube did a great job of explaining the structure of the towers and how there is no way planes could have brought it down. I encourage anyone to watch it if you have the time.
Originally posted by skeptic_al
reply to post by TrueAmerican
Sorry, He lost me a Cheese Grater. It sounds like this "Architect" has
no Idea about the amount of Kinetic Energy in a Fully Loaded Jumbo going at 500mph.
Yeah, A few Inches of steel should hold it back.
Originally posted by jthomas
Originally posted by cerberus00
Can we all not agree that this building collapsing is at least strange? It didn't get hit by any planes, and there were just a couple really small fires, so why did it fall?
Who told you that? The fires were large, burned unfought for many hours, and were started by the damage from the outer walls ejected from the collpase of WTC 1.
Even people here are claiming that:
Hundreds of 4 ton exterior wall sections were hurled in all directions from both towers up to 600 feet away at velocities up to 55 mph.
It takes explosive forces to eject 4 ton and heavier steel pieces sideways at 55 mph.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
So it's no surprise that the damage done to WTC 7 and the consequent fires led to its collapse.
Originally posted by skeptic_al
reply to post by cerberus00
Did you take into account that some Large Outside pieces of Towers were
blown outward and fell up 600ft away from the Tower. These steel H frames weighed
more than 10 Tons each. Drop a 10 Ton steel Object from
100 stories and see how much damage it does. It would prabably sound
like Boooommmm, not to mention the earth shaking experience.
Originally posted by liveandletlive
Originally posted by jthomas
Originally posted by cerberus00
Can we all not agree that this building collapsing is at least strange? It didn't get hit by any planes, and there were just a couple really small fires, so why did it fall?
Who told you that? The fires were large, burned unfought for many hours, and were started by the damage from the outer walls ejected from the collpase of WTC 1.
Even people here are claiming that:
Hundreds of 4 ton exterior wall sections were hurled in all directions from both towers up to 600 feet away at velocities up to 55 mph.
It takes explosive forces to eject 4 ton and heavier steel pieces sideways at 55 mph.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
So it's no surprise that the damage done to WTC 7 and the consequent fires led to its collapse.
Can you clarify a statement you made for me? When you point out that “it takes explosive forces to eject 4 ton and heavier steel pieces sideways at 55 mph are you saying that this is why WTC7 was heavily damaged and eventually fell? I haven’t formed a definite opinion on what happened on 9-11 yet but there are things that don’t sit right with me and your statement is one of them. What actually causes a burning building to eject 4 ton and heavier steel pieces sideways at 55 mph?
Most of the 9/11 Truth Movement claims that nothing hit WTC 7 from WTC 1 while SPreston and others in the "movement" agree that it's perfectly plausible.