It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by uk alienhunter
Just one more thing i thought of after reading your op once again.. U claim dna is too complex to be here just by chance and would need a creator..
ok.. well...If u continue with your logic then im pretty sure your GOD would be far more complex than dna, so it begs the question who created your god??? cos something so complex needs a creator.. right??? lol
Originally posted by bwinwright
Atheism is scientifically impossible
Atheism, the denial of the necessity for any intelligence in the establishment of the universe and all of the life within it has been proved to be scientifically impossible.
Pherhaps you are confused as to what the term atheism means, it simply refers to the denial God, or a god. Unless you can say with certainty that God created our universe it is impossible to scientifically disprove or prove the existence of God. If you do know the source of such info I would love to educate myself.
The Darwinian Atheist believes that DNA simply arrived on the scene by some form of cosmic chance or luck, not requiring any form of intelligent assistance. Of course, to make themselves sound less ridiculous, Atheists like to use the term Natural Selection to explain such things. Of course, Darwin’s Theory of Natural Selection is just that, a theory, which has now been scientifically proven to be false.
When has this occured? Fossil evidence and new studies show that Darwin's theory is likely correct, although he did not account for radical changes in an organism that can occur when even a dormant gene is manipulated. An example is that one small change in an idividual gene can allow birds to grow teeth, the result being a dinsosaur like mouth/beak. I guess the only thing more rediculous than creating a theory of our existence through understanding and learning from our surroundings is to believe a story of a guy written thousands of years ago (and almaost a century after his death) in a language far different than today's, and seating your values and beliefs in that.
In reality, God is everything that is. God is omnipresent, meaning that God is everywhere, occupying all space, simultaneously. There is nothing that is not God.
Since this God is omnipresent, God must also be omnipotent or all-powerful. This is true because even the tiniest particle or wave of energy possesses power and since God is everything, God must possess all of the power.
God is omniscient or all-knowing too. Since God is everything, one organic whole, this ineffable, multi-dimensional form of oneness, like one big mind, then it is reasonable to conclude that this God must also be all-knowing. It knows everything in its one big mind which includes everything.
Again you are mistaken, pherhaps opening dictionary or purchasing another one would be helpful. God is the creator of everything, not everything. I kind of agree with your premise that we are all divine but find that current religions tend only to divide people instead of uniting them in this idea.
You seem to be religous as you capitalize god, yet all of your points could well be made by someone who is agnostic. God, in one form or another has been around since mankind has tried to explain the universe. The sun rises because of the sun god, we catch food because of the fish god etc. Also, religions have been changed, stories borrowed or stolen for just as long. For a good look on the history of religion, from people that have studied for centuries read 'The Evolution of God'.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
When will they ever learn that nothing of value will ever be found in a book written by so-called scientists?
God's Word is all they need to find the Truth! Come to Church next Sunday and sing with joy as we roast marshmallows over burning science stuff. Get thee down Satan!! Out sinister Darwin!