It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Maybe one way to address your questions is to look in Spaceweather's archives to see what comments were made about similar events at that site at the time, and perhaps make comparisons with more recent events. SOHO has a page called "movie theatre" and you can use a start and end date, (preferable) to get a rolling set of pictures. The set of frame times you get are variable from day to day, and there are differentials between say, the different LASCO sets of frames. Spaceweather's pages only mention Comets in regard to this thread, that is not to say that their interpretation is the same as everyone else.
Originally posted by SaneThinking
If the first and third were asteroids would that be able to explain why there was a CME produced by those objects, due to a solid core? And the chance that there would be deeper pentration to the surface before explosion or disintergration.
And as I have been told the second is definantly a comet, due to the luminescent tail as well as glow the object gave off. And thus as your analogy states. Would burn up like a tennis ball sized scope of ice cream, over a thousand degree Australia. And not really produce much effect as we saw.
I just have a hard time seeing how theres no correlation to the two none glowing objects, on the same trajectory. Striking the sun and subsequent CME's that follow, though once again just my opinion. And I'm no astronomer just an eager observer, with a google educated consenus. LoL
SaneThinking
Originally posted by Grayelf2009
ps. I noticed a large flare just before that hit on the same side. Magnetic pull perhaps?
Originally posted by White2098
Did anybody see the big Halo around the sun two days ago? It was all the way around the sun and almost had a rainbow look to it, but more faint. It was beautiful does anybody know if if this impact had anything to do with it.