It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PookztA
This is why, in my honest opinion, I feel that 9/11 involved a Directed Energy Weapon of some kind
Originally posted by PookztA
How come steel and concrete were pulverized
Originally posted by PookztA
aluminum had electrical burns, but paper was unharmed
Originally posted by PookztA
how come thousands and thousands of paper sheets were completely unharmed?
Originally posted by PookztA
If thermite alone caused the destruction of the buildings
Originally posted by PookztA
how come there are many reports of power outages and electrical failures in the areas surrounding ground zero during the attacks?
Originally posted by PookztA
where is all the molten steel? Thousands of pictures, yet not a single one shows large quantities of molten steel?
Originally posted by PookztA
how come there was significant magnetosphere readings in Alaska at the very same time of the 9/11 attacks?
Originally posted by PookztA
how come countless vehicles located several blocks away from ground zero experienced metal warping and electricity-like burns and holes during the attacks
Originally posted by PookztA
How come Dr. Wood has already filed several legal cases against suspected 9/11-involved defense and weapons companies and NIST, yet Dr. Jones has not?
Originally posted by PookztA
How come Dr. Wood has already been taking legal steps towards demanding a new 9/11 investigation, yet Dr. Jones does not support her legal efforts?
Originally posted by PookztA
How come Dr. Jones has not officially filed or shared his nano-thermite evidence with Congress, NIST, or any official governmental body? Why the delay?
Originally posted by PookztA
Why is Dr. Jones just now claiming to be “pursuing a new 9/11 investigation”
Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
However, when I do see a group shut the door on certain theories, without having access to a thorough investigation and all Government information, I have to wonder long and hard about their credibility.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
But anyone who has done any kind of research into 9/11 or the 9/11 truth movement knows that these "theories" are not supported by the 9/11 truth movement and those who peddle them are not 9/11 truthers.
Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
reply to post by iamcpc
As with any historical event, different people believe different things. Take World War 2 as an example: there are plenty of aspects of the war that are argued by historians, why are those historians not mocked? Why are only people looking for the truth about 9/11 mocked?