It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“After all, how difficult can it be?
Let’s make a state law for that and everything will be fine!” Thinking in such a way and without checking the issue, the Knesset, Israel's Parliament, legislated the Law of Return On July 5, 1950.
The law gives automatic citizenship upon landing in the state to those born Jews (having a Jewish mother or maternal grandmother), those with Jewish ancestry (having a Jewish father or grandfather) and converts to Judaism (Orthodox, Reform, or Conservative denominations, though the last two must take place outside the state since these currents are not recognized by the Chief Rabbinate).
The day after, the confused cleaning lady of the Knesset asked the Prime Minister: “Who is a Jew?” Annoyed, the Prime Minister exiled her to Zambia and forgot her question. Until this day it remains unanswered and at the very heart of the State of Israel.
Simply, it doesn’t differentiate between the ethnic group and the religion. Each one of these categories is open to different interpretations. Under certain interpretations, many millions of Muslims in Afghanistan and nearby Central Asian locations could ask for Israeli citizenship and transform the human landscape of Israel overnight.
The political leadership of the state is very careful not to touch this law anymore and to delegate personal issues (birth, marriage, death and in fact all religious matters) to the Chief Rabbinate.
It’s a boiling potato.
Even in Israel many citizens do not understand the issue properly.
Israel likes to portray itself as a Western country, but its foundations are deep within Asia. There are two basic models upon which nations are based. One is territorial, claiming a country exists in a given territory; this is the situation in the Americas and Europe (the last may be changing, see the ugly treatment of Muslims in France).
The second is ethnic, claiming a nation is formed by individuals belonging to a given ethnic group. Many Asians countries belong to this category; Thailand is a good example. The early Thai kingdoms were almost nomadic in nature, moving slowly southwards from Xishuangbanna – in Yunnan, China – to Thailand’s actual location. These kingdoms were defined not by territory but by the people composing them. It is so to such an extreme, that only in 1913, the significant Chinese minority got citizenship.
By legislating the Law of Return, the State of Israel placed itself among this group of ethnic nations. It could have worked if it wasn’t for one tiny detail:
“Who is a Jew?”
Originally posted by Josephus23
reply to post by thatredpill
First, I would like to say thank you for all of the well thought out responses.
I must, however, point to some controversies in what you said. Especially regarding the Talmud.
Judaism only has one text of law, which was divinely revealed to Moses by God, and it is known as the Torah.
When Jews finally became somewhat prominent citizens in Rome two "opposing" sides developed:
The pharicees and the sadducces.
And the rift between the two was a result of.... None other than the Talmud.
The Talmud is as hate filled as the qur'an (unless, that is, you finding that boiling Jesus in a vat of hot sperm isn't quite ruthless enough to qualify as hate.)
Jesus founded the Christian church as a response against these pharicees and sadducees.
Thus, the hatred regarding him as King of the Jews.
So back to my original point.
Being Jewish is as simple as converting. That's it.
It is the exact same as every other religion in that way.
JEWS ARE NOT A RACE OF PEOPLE. Stop listening to the propaganda.
JEWS PRACTICE JUDAISM. THAT IS ALL. NO RACE ANYTHING IS INVOLVED.
EDIT I:
But anyway...
I gave you a star theredpill because, even if i don't agree with your response 100%, I am highly appreciative of people who can discuss this without the normal racist BS.
You obviously put a good bit of effort into that response, either collectively over time or intensely at once, and I highly respect that in you.
[edit on 3/8/2010 by Josephus23]
Originally posted by Josephus23
reply to post by thatredpill
I agree with you and I am beginning to understand exactly what you meant.
Although I will say that modern Jewry almost desperately claims the modern banking system (at least the Ashkenazim) as one of their collection of inventions that furthered our civilization's movement toward novelty. Speaking in pure numbers they are a culture that has produced an inordinate number of groundbreaking novelties.
BTW... Leornado de Fibonacci is responsible for the modern banking system (as in Fibonacci's spiral; however, maybe he is a Jew)
I think that evolutionarily unique mutations and survival mechanisms would have surely developed throughout the ages due to Jews focus on marriage laws. The focus on the mothers DNA tends to lessen the chance of recessive traits.
I will give them their props. No Doubt. That is why I said that I am not "anti-Semitic", but it would be ignoring the big pile of dung in the room if we were to not talk about the most wealthy of Jewry, those calling the shots, whom have intermarried into the aristocratic bloodline of royalty.
That leads to TOO much recessive gene expression due to exclusivity and possible inbreeding. (I don't know if the latter is true, but it was common practice until as recently as 100 years ago.)
Something is not right. Their genocide of the Arabs is SYSTEMATIC and they claim to be the most evolved humans.
This could all end in a very ugly way.