It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Is there any significance of this heavenly body appearing in this time?

page: 2
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 2 2010 @ 08:29 PM
link   
reply to post by Snarf
 

I think you're mistaking the "heavenly body" as a direct definition of God/Jesus. But it's not, has nothing to do w/ either.. The Moon is a heavenly body.. Earth is a heavenly body.. get it?



posted on Mar, 2 2010 @ 08:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ear-Responsible
reply to post by Snarf
 

I think you're mistaking the "heavenly body" as a direct definition of God/Jesus. But it's not, has nothing to do w/ either.. The Moon is a heavenly body.. Earth is a heavenly body.. get it?


No, No, i do get it. But the context in which the question is being asked is a religious one.

Therefore, we are talking about God, and by the OP's own words, we are talking about the question of "end days"

....get it?

I'm not saying that the heavenly body is anything - the OP is asking "is it a sword"

I'm saying --- NO its not.

This is quite simple folks.

[edit on 2-3-2010 by Snarf]



posted on Mar, 2 2010 @ 10:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Strype
 


Thanks Strype...but the q is significance if there's any but I'm leaning towards just a coincidence.



posted on Mar, 2 2010 @ 10:34 PM
link   
reply to post by Snarf
 


Snarf, do you subscribe to a PanEnDeist system of beliefs?

Don't mean to hijack the thread... Just curious.


I find that this belief structure most closely fits my own (at least amongst the established structures), although not perfectly.

If you have not heard of it, might be worth checking out.

Although I almost feel dirty by associating myself with a defined belief system; it is NOT a religion, and therefor rather benign.



posted on Mar, 2 2010 @ 10:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by Snarf
reply to post by Solasis
 



You still ought to admit that you left out the gap between "end times" and "not a man in the sky" in your original post, though.



You won't be able to see the second coming of Christ, because it won't be an event - it will just be.



It cannot be any less gap-free and clearly spelled out than that. its a very simple answer that i gave, then i went into a longer, more drawn out description of WHY it is the answer.


Er, well, let's see. There was actually no direct suggestion that Christ would be coming back, only that this X could be a sign of something, PROBABLY the end times. That DOES NOT NECESSITATE THE COMING OF CHRIST. There are possibilities that prophecies like that are semi-true, while there is no second coming or anything. Your answer did NOT ADDRESS THE QUESTION THAT WAS BEING ASKED. It answered a related question. No one's denying that. But in fact, the question didn't even DIRECTLY ask about the end times. It asked about an allegedly historical event in which a sword appeared in the sky.

You were wrong. Admit i.

Notice how I'm not calling you a troll?


And having a degree doesn't mean a damn thing these days.

College Degrees are like High School degree's.

They're about as useful as the paper they are printed on.

"Hey, i graduated college"

Wow...so did everyone else who doesn't have a job.


actually, both of my parents graduated college and have jobs. My mom manages a restaurant. so, yeah. More importantly, though, I wasn't bragging, it was a joke about the nature of my semantics. Also, I haven't even graduated yet



posted on Mar, 2 2010 @ 10:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Solasis
 


there is nothing to admit.

I answered a perfectly legitimate question to the best of my ability and i elaborated on the answer in an attempt to enlighten someone as to "Why" i said "no"

If you wish to pursue this conversation any longer, you'll be talking with yourself.

I've fed the trolls enough for one day...don't want you getting high cholesterol



posted on Mar, 2 2010 @ 11:01 PM
link   
reply to post by Snarf
 


Okay no seriously, you need to stop calling people trolls for calling you out on your BS. What sense was I trolling in? How was I POSSIBLY trolling? Is rational thought trolling now?



posted on Mar, 2 2010 @ 11:14 PM
link   


You were wrong. Admit i.





I'm not saying that the heavenly body is anything - the OP is asking "is it a sword"



I'd hate to see you two with real bone.

Is 1 1/2 pages enough for you guys? Ya think?

[edit on 2-3-2010 by randyvs]



posted on Mar, 3 2010 @ 08:25 AM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


however long it takes man. The OP asked a question - i tried to provide an answer.

The *cough* troll among us just wanted to argue.



posted on Mar, 10 2010 @ 02:59 AM
link   
reply to post by Snarf
 



It bugs me when people refer to god as fact as he is a character in a book written by guess who MEN.
Man created god not the other way.

Thats my $0.02,£0.02 worth.



posted on Mar, 10 2010 @ 03:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
reply to post by Snarf
 



I COMPLETELY AGREE!!! So much so, I starred your post.



In regards to the thread, I'll say, yes, it has significance.


And God said, "Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to separate the day from the night; and let them be for signs ('oth, markers, indicators) and for seasons (moadhim, "solemn assembly") and for days and years, and let them be lights in the firmament of the heavens to give light upon the earth." And it was so. And God made the two great lights, the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night; he made the stars also. And God set them in the firmament of the heavens to give light upon the earth, to rule over the day and over the night, and to separate the light from the darkness. And God saw that it was good. And there was evening and there was morning, a fourth day. (Genesis 1:14-19)

Astronomical events have spiritual significance

[edit on 2-3-2010 by SpeakerofTruth]


But doesnt that prove its all BS? He didnt make TWO lights did he? the moon isnt a light? its a rock. Just a rock. Or is the fact that the part total nonsense just ignored? Sorry, dont wish to knock anyones beliefs, but as what i consider a rational guy, i cant get my head round how people can believe in the bible or in any organised religion when most of whats written is total nonsense????



posted on Mar, 10 2010 @ 06:10 PM
link   
reply to post by expatwhite
 


Mmmmmm, yes and no to your reply. I certainly do not take the bible in the traditional literal sense. I can't. Sorry.

However, if you're going to totally disregard any form of religion or spiritual belief, which I am assuming you might, to me, that makes for a pretty sad existence. However each to their own.

Anyway, in regards to stars and what they were placed in the heavens for, if you're going to use the bible, there is more than one reference.

Here is another reference:


25 And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring;
26 Men's hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken.
27 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.
- Luke 21:25-27 in the King James Version of The Bible
Stars

[edit on 10-3-2010 by SpeakerofTruth]



posted on Mar, 10 2010 @ 06:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by Snarf
 



It bugs me when people refer to god as fact as he is a character in a book written by guess who MEN.
Man created god not the other way.

Thats my $0.02,£0.02 worth.


Amen to that brother!!
bugs the hell out of me to. Evolutions just a theory and yet the bibles taken as fact, go figure!



posted on Mar, 11 2010 @ 03:19 AM
link   
reply to post by SpeakerofTruth
 


Hi Speakeroftruth

Thanks for the measured answer, however the quotes from the bible you provided make no more sense than the original quote about him creating 2 lights.

i honestly dont want to knock your beliefs, i just want to understand them more. Why do you think its sad if i have no spiritual belief? To me i feel better knowing that my destiny and fate is in my hands. If it goes tits up then i have friends and family for support. But they are tangible. I can hug my friends, i can cry on their shoulder, i can borrow 20 quid off them for beer. You cant do that with faith, so how does it comfort you?

Please dont think im being funny with you. My life is totally in a mess, i have so much REALLY bad stuff going on at the moment that i seriously contemplated swinging from a rope at the weekend (past that now i hope) but i cant see how any spiritual belief would make a difference? Only my own strength and the support of friends kept me going. I cant see how believing in something i cant see, touch, taste, smell, hear etc would help? In my mind i might as well worship unicorns or dragons as they have the same evidence for existence. And if there was a God, why would he pile so much stress hassle and crap on my shoulders? Why not test one of his faithful rather than a non believer?

Thats not me being facetious, just honest and open. I would welcome your response as to how being more spiritual would and could help me



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join