Trust Your Eyes , New AE vid . N Tower

Watch all the outward explosions occurring as the building Self-distructs on its

downward course.

Girders being Shot out of the Tower at speeds of 70 miles per hour , some landing

up to 200 yards away. Shouldn't these pieces just fall if it was a gravity fall?

What are you seeing ?

Kind of hard to dispute the evidence in the vid.

Explosions happenings , setting the path for collapse.

Don't normally reply to this stuff, but the only observation I have to make is all that your seeing (the puffs? explosions coming out the side of the building) is caused buy what would be the huge pressures of hundreds of tons of steel an concrete pushing down blowing out windows. In my opinion now explosives, just great pressure.

reply to post by Chance321


Thats what It looks like at first glance, but the explosions are happening

floors below the collapse, in some cases 30 ,40 floors.

How does a building FALLING DOWN, eject tons of steel at 70 mph , some

at a distance of 200 yards.

reply to post by Sean48

How does a building FALLING DOWN, eject tons of steel at 70 mph , some

at a distance of 200 yards.

Because it was NOT a planned, controlled demolition.

Gravity was smashing down all the tons and tons overhead, and the beams below, since they didn't always fall inward, were thrust outward....

Controlled demolitions do NOT "BLOW" stuff laterally!!! That is the entire point of a controlled demolition! To contain collateral damage.

EVERY "CD" uses the explosives to strategically take out key structural supports, in key locations, and allows gravity to do the rest.

Towers were fatally damaged, at impact point....failed there, weight above started down, and then it cascaded.

It is really quite simple, and obvious to understand.

reply to post by weedwhacker


You are describing a bottom up demolition.

Kinda how WTC7 fell, you made that case for us quite well, it was bottom up.

The Towers were a top down.

good effort though.

Anyone who watched it live and believe the official story wants their heads checked full stop. The buildings where demolished and Bush and Co got away scot free. Makes me sick to the pit of my stomach

Bush did not do it. Even if it was an inside job, it was done by the Clinton and the Cheney.

reply to post by Sean48

Kinda how WTC7 fell, you made that case for us quite well, it was bottom up.

Nope.

You can see WTC 7 penthouse level initiating the collapse, first....crashing down, pulling everything else with it, TOP DOWN.

BUT, if you're insisting on Towers being 'CD'....you just admitted they were NOT 'bottom up'!!

Can't have it both ways, mate.

Originally posted by weedwhacker


You can see WTC 7 penthouse level initiating the collapse, first....crashing down, pulling everything else with it, TOP DOWN.

I'm probably a tad older than you , so my eyes may be off .

Lets look at the collapse together , shall we.

Now , you said it was top down..

I say it was bottom up...

reply to post by Sean48


Like I said, you have tremendous? (excuse the spelling ) pressure pushing down, the windows will hold it in till they can't take it any more an blow out, same with the steel beams, they'll hold long as they can, but when they give they're gonna fly.

reply to post by Sean48


Yes, your video shows clearly what I mean....watch very, very closely at the roof, see it cave in FIRST, before global collapse and cascading begins.

Last I checked, roof is on TOP of building....collapses first.

Top down.

Originally posted by Chance321


Like I said, you have tremendous? (excuse the spelling

) pressure pushing down, the windows will hold it in till they can't take it any more an blow out, same with the steel beams, they'll hold long as they can, but when they give they're gonna fly.

What tremendous pressure exist downwards ?

Everything above the building collapse, is Dust.

Dust dosen't exert pressure , to blow girders 70mph.

Originally posted by weedwhacker


Last I checked, roof is on TOP of building....collapses first.

Top down.

In a earlier post , I said I was probably a tad bit older, in need of glasses.

Vanity won't serve you WW , a check up is easy.

If you see that as a Top Down, than you can't be reasoned with.

I guess those were not planes that flew into them either!

They must have been holo images.

Originally posted by Submarines
I guess those were not planes that flew into them either!

They must have been holo images.

Thank you for such a well thought out and informative response.

The reasearch must have taken hours.

No one claims planes were not used , in 2 out of 3 buildings.

Originally posted by Sean48

Originally posted by weedwhacker


Last I checked, roof is on TOP of building....collapses first.

Top down.

In a earlier post , I said I was probably a tad bit older, in need of glasses.

Vanity won't serve you WW , a check up is easy.

If you see that as a Top Down, than you can't be reasoned with.

I think you need to get to an opticians pretty smartly. The penthouse, like on the roof, falls in first; its not a matter of debate.

Wow, there is definitely some (seemingly) unrelated explosions going on! This video really shows the collapse from a different angle

I don't take sides with the 9/11 theories but I don't think this video is calling it a *controlled* demolition. It is just pointing out the flaws in the official analysis.

This video only brings information not conclusions but I believe the actual story now at this point is irrelevant. With that said I do hope to see some revisions to the story and I'm glad a respectful, educated, peer group got together finally get this some attention!

[edit on 24-2-2010 by kyle43]

Originally posted by kyle43
Wow, there is definitely some (seemingly) unrelated explosions going on!

I don't take sides with the 9/11 theories but I don't think this video is calling it a *controlled* demolition. It is just pointing out the flaws in the official analysis.

This video only brings information not conclusions but I believe the actual story now at this point is irrelevant. With that said I do hope to see some revisions to the story and I'm glad a scholarly group got together finally get this some attention!

Thats all we so called Truthers want.

The Truth.

When did that become a bad thing.

reply to post by Sean48


Not a bad thing at all! When i say irrelevant I mean that at this point, who done it and why will be continued to be painfully and slowly traced back to the true master mind. Nothing good can come from that!

The term Truther is a mockery; it implies you only want the truth, but I would argue many of the people that want the truth to come out would actually rather have a change for the truth to come out.