reply to post by xxshadowfaxx
So, I'm not solid on a lot of this evidence, so I'll leave it alone until I look into it. (If I ever get a chance to look into it. I want to; I'm
really interested in legitimately approaching 2012 stuff from a skeptical perspective, but I'm really interested in so many things that I probably
won't get a chance.) But the stuff I am solid on, or at least solid enough on to ask deeper questions. And please recall that I am NOT attacking
you. I am asking these questions legitimately. I doubt you are correct, but i do not deny that you could be. I am asking to learn the answers, not
to show that you do not know them.
1) Where does the cycle of the precession of the equinoxes start? It seems to me that it could start from any old position along its course, and that
one of its cycles could be said to ending at every moment. It just now completed one cycle, measured from one starting point. What is the starting
point for the cycle, and what is the basis for choosing it? (A little research indicates the alignment of the Winter Solstice Sun with the Galactic
Equator; This still seems a little arbitrary to me, for various reasons having to do with the motion of the sun which I can break down later if you
like.)
2) What is this evidence to do with the I-Ching? That it has the proper number of entries to POSSIBLY be a lunar calendar for the chinese? Where is
the other evidence for this?
3) So many people CAN be wrong about 2012. So many people were wrong about the sun orbiting the Earth. So many people have been wrong about dozens,
hundreds, if not many many many thousands of things before. You cannot defend a claim by "this many people believe it!"
4) I would love to do my own research, but you have said that your research has shown it to be utterly undeniable. A part of research, a part of the
scientific process, is not hoarding your results to yourself. If you hide your research and tell other people to do it themselves, you are both
selfish and a bad researcher. If your research has proven it to be absolute fact, you have a responsibility to share this with the rest of the world,
or at least solid guidelines for achieving the exact same results you have achieved.
reply to post by xxshadowfaxx
Spiral Petroglyphs? *looks them up* OMG A SPIRAL. THEY MUST HAVE SEEN THE NORWAY SPIRAL BEFORE. NO ONE HAS EVER DRAWN A SPIRAL FOR ANY OTHER
REASON. OH man, my best friend draws spirals -- is she from ancient times trying to warn us?! Nautilisks -- they have spiral shells, are they the
remnants of doom-bringing aliens?
--Okay actually that last idea is pretty cool.
And yes, this one is kind of an attack on your ideas. I apologize for that. But seriously -- what makes these spirals so different from other
spirals?
reply to post by Flighty
Wroooooong. This is one library being closed down. These reference books and the information and England's history all continues to exist in other
libraries which are open and undisturbed.
reply to post by mars1
Yes we know you are thinking of the seed vault. You can stop saying that now. You are thinking of the seed vault.